USA Goes to War Against Iran
Time for a dedicated thread to the war.
How long will it last and what will be the probable outcome?
I don't even know why I was posting at all at 5am on Sunday morning, put your phone down and go the **** to sleep.
I heard about Trump donning that hat, but didn't see it.
Do you plan to pre-order your 'Harris 2028' hat?
"He's just joking around! Yuck yuck yuck. Have a wonderful day!"
Spoiler
You would have an actual stroke if Obama ran for a third term.
just for demonstration purposes
tilting at a windmill is a four hundred year old joke from Cervantes
the lone wolf is literally tilting the angle of their rifle
trump hates windmills
quixotic refers to don quixote, the guy who tilted at the windmills in Cervantes
I missed the one about Trump hating windmills, which was a bit dumb of me, but the rest was fairly obvious.
it looks like Ukraine wants some smoke too. gotta admit, pretty smart play by Zelensky to murder some Iranians to try to impress the US and further entrench these wars. probably not a coincidence that Laura Loomer and a bunch of other MAGAs are suddenly pro-Ukraine.
it looks like Ukraine wants some smoke too. gotta admit, pretty smart play by Zelensky to murder some Iranians to try to impress the US and further entrench these wars. probably not a coincidence that Laura Loomer and a bunch of other MAGAs are suddenly pro-Ukraine.
Loomer's about-face and defection from Putin-worship is probably due to two things. One, she just experienced the first air raid of her privileged life while in Kyiv and found it scary. And two, she's a Trump parasite and Trump seems to have changed his view -- he no longer sees Putin as a winner and Ukraine as a loser, since Ukraine has stopped Putin cold and is now the world leader in the development and use of new-tech drone warfare, from which the US and the West are keen to learn.
The US is moving significant assets into theatre. It is my hopes that is in preparation to take the country of Iran. This is the only way.
God Bless America!
as I told you guys for years, Trump was never pro-Russia or pro-Putin or any of that bullshit and he would continue right where Biden left off in arming Ukraine and supporting the war.
anyway, this should finally put to bed the idea that Ukraine was ever anything but a murderous Western puppet.
as I told you guys for years, Trump was never pro-Russia or pro-Putin or any of that bullshit and he would continue right where Biden left off in arming Ukraine and supporting the war.
anyway, this should finally put to bed the idea that Ukraine was ever anything but a murderous Western puppet.
The context is of course that Russia and Iran are trading partners and have likely been supplying each other weapons.
Iran attacked Ukraine first by arming Russia.
The context is of course that Russia and Iran are trading partners and have likely been supplying each other weapons.
Iran attacked Ukraine first by arming Russia.
Iran is where Russia's much-used Shahed ('Martyr') drones come from.
The context is of course that Russia and Iran are trading partners and have likely been supplying each other weapons.
Iran attacked Ukraine first by arming Russia.
so they bombed a civilian Iranian ship?
anyway, surely you wouldnt be mad if Russia decided to treat Ukrainian trade partners and weapons providers the same.
so they bombed a civilian Iranian ship?
anyway, surely you wouldnt be mad if Russia decided to treat Ukrainian trade partners and weapons providers the same.
I would find it an incredible military blunder as right now Ukraine only gets indirect military assistance, whereas if Russia did that then they would likely pull other countries into the war.
I would find it an incredible military blunder as right now Ukraine only gets indirect military assistance, whereas if Russia did that then they would likely pull other countries into the war.
I mean, according the crd they already are at war with Russia
Iran attacked Ukraine first by arming Russia.
Getting attacked doesn’t mean you’re at war necessarily. That’s why it’s called casus belli, because it’s an act that serves as a justification for war, not that forces you to go to war.
Of course not all casus belli are created equal, some will involve direct invasion which will almost always lead to war.
President Donald Trump has paused attacks on Iran for the second night in a row to give diplomacy more time, the US ambassador to the UN said.
Speaking to Fox News on Sunday, ambassador Mike Waltz said the president was "giving talks some space, he's giving it a little bit of room".
An Iranian army spokesperson said on Sunday that Tehran had halted "retaliatory" attacks in the region in response.
so they bombed a civilian Iranian ship?
anyway, surely you wouldnt be mad if Russia decided to treat Ukrainian trade partners and weapons providers the same.
Russia should try that and see how it works out for them...
how would it go any different than now? Europe cant fight and the USA is stretched far too thin. Im sure the West will bomb some kindergartens but thats not winning.
The US is moving significant assets into theatre. It is my hopes that is in preparation to take the country of Iran. This is the only way.
Wasn't it a few months ago that your super-secret sources said that some special-ops units were on their way and would end the war?
how would it go any different than now? Europe cant fight and the USA is stretched far too thin. Im sure the West will bomb some kindergartens but thats not winning.
Man, really!! Russia has been fighting Ukraine for how long? And have not been able to win.
You think if they attacked any NATO country that the response would not be significant enough for Russia to regret doing it.
We are not talking Iran here, who would rather die than give in. We are talking Russia, and the military leaders would chose survival over suicide. Heck, Poland alone is just itching for a reason to get involved. Germany and the UK would defend any NATO country that was hit, so there goes the Russia nuclear threat. All the other NATO nations would play a part, and they would set up NATO bases in Ukraine because..... Russia would have brought NATO into the Ukraine war.
The US might stay home, but they would not even be needed.
Man, really!! Russia has been fighting Ukraine for how long? And have not been able to win.You think if they attacked any NATO country that the response would not be significant enough for Russia to regret doing it.We are not talking Iran here, who would rather die than give in. We are talking Russia, and the military leaders would chose survival over suicide. Heck, Poland alo
I think you overestimate the potential escalations from the West. NATO and the countries you mention are already providing almost all of the weapons they build to Ukraine. the West simply does not make enough munitions right now.
ofc they are also providing intelligence, targeting, and for all intents and purposes do have NATO bases in Ukraine as we speak.
could NATO provide troops, which is what Ukraine really needs? well, good luck with telling French, Germans, and British they are going to go die for NATO and Trump while their quality of life at home spirals. (actually, Im sure the Germans would be happy to do some mass murder of children but I think the rest of the countries wont be too happy.) ofc it will hurt Russia but I just dont think it will be enough. obv Putin doesnt want to ring that bell and that is why he hasnt bombed these punk countries logistics yet. many think he should...
Russia has been fighting Ukraine for how long? And have not been able to win.
I look at it in reverse. the West has been fighting Russia for how long? (100s of years tbh but we can just start in 2014 for this round).
I did post something like that. I am no longer getting information from that individual.
The meds are working. Very good.
Would you have a stroke if Obama were still president today and gearing up for his 6th term?
You disagree with Washington that the office is owned by the public and not one person?
Would you have a stroke if Obama were still president today and gearing up for his 6th term?
Of course not.
You disagree with Washington that the office is owned by the public and not one person?
The office is owned by the public in the sense that as public servants the office-holder's duty is to serve the people. And if the public wants the same person to be President for 24 years, why not?
FDR was re-elected by wide margins three times.
Delaware was happy with Joe Biden being their Senator for something like five terms.
