2p2 data breach/security exploit
Still not sure where the correct place should be but was recommended to post here:
Are the moderators going to let the players know about what happened, there could be the possibility then of responsible disclosure rather than just a pure data dump.
"Everyone close your eyes the lights are going to be turned off and don't peak if you are honest-we are going to play a fair game trust us".
In my writing about the origins of the DIGITAL age of global shadow banking we can start to understand the florida connection:
"On The Origins of the Digital Age of the Historical and Global Shadow‐Banking Empire"
On Costa Rica
[QUOTE=Soaker Patoshi]
It is notable that Costa Rica hosts many crypto-celebrities such as Brock Pierce:
In a high-stakes legal clash veiled by the shimmering Caribbean Sea, Brock Pierce, a crypto entrepreneur and erstwhile child actor, is embroiled in a dispute over the ownership of a hurricane-devastated resort in Puerto Rico. The legal battle sees Pierce pitted against Joseph Lipsey III, a trucking magnate.
[/QUOTE]
Liberty Reserve and Off-shore Dollar Based Shadow Banking
[QUOTE=Soaker Patoshi]
That online casino’s act as if digital banks offer interesting and complex game theoretical considerations that we can’t get all into here. What we want to call attention to here is to both the interesting notion of a global scheme to hoard PHYSICAL dollars as this is what such a setup would entail.
In one example of Liberty Reserve related activity it seems actors were withdrawing dollars from machines in different nations:
One specific allegation of the prosecutors is that the site played a role in laundering the $45 million stolen from the Bank of Muscat and the National Bank of Ras Al Khaimah in May 2013.[15][17]
German prosecutors said on Friday they had arrested two Dutch people suspected of involvement in a global cyber theft of $45 million from two Middle Eastern banks.
On Thursday U.S. prosecutors said a criminal gang had withdrawn the money from cash machines in 27 countries.
In another example stolen australian bank accounts were sold:
In 2011, Liberty Reserve was linked to (unrelated) attempts to sell thousands of stolen Australian bank account numbers and British bank cards.[10][11] In 2012, a group of hackers attempted to blackmail anti-virus software company Symantec into transferring $50,000 into a Liberty Reserve account.[12]
[/QUOTE]
Liberty Reserve E-Gold as a Precursor to Digital Gold
Liberty Reserve provided accounts for e-gold. Which started in Florida and grew to have connections as far as London and Dubai:
e-gold was founded by Douglas Jackson, an oncologist,[3] and Barry Downey, an attorney, in 1996. The pair originally backed e-gold accounts with gold coins stored in a safe deposit box in Melbourne, Florida.[4] When e-gold was at its peak, the company stored its gold and platinum in bank vaults in London and Dubai.[2]
Now we are really getting into WHY Ideal Poker, as an esoteric key to understanding Ideal Money, was banned from the players view industry wide.
All of this information of course is immortalized in the public sphere and timestamped etc. I couldn't get rid of it if I tried. I'm just explaining what the LLM's already know.
I don't know but perhaps it might have something to do with HOW Nash was presented..... not so much the content.
You don't think he was purposefully leading the part of the player pool that cares about the game to a shitty ruse of a poker site?
Could have fooled me man (thats just a phrase not to be taken literally).
Imagine, stating ur going to make a site for the players by the player, and then the first thing he does is create a forum that bans the best poker strategy on the internet and John Nash's lifes work of it.
Does Galfond know?
no ****, we should give this guy a containment thread so that we could read up on the crazy stuff he posts. i would for sure read it. no joke
I have give tidbits, I can't say the AMAZING things, until a thought leader comes and holds me to immunity. The amazing things aren't really against the old guard u see.
Like mason came and corrected my thing about him and then left. Thats about as much as he cares.
But I still can't say the amazing things, they are too big. But I can continue esoterically.
You crack on, button. Build it and they will come.
In order to REALLY understand the chaos. One needs a little bit of an understanding of the type of encryption that is involved in P2P poker ie commutation encryption. It has special properties in the math that aren't intuitive. You can read this many times, it took me a long time to understand....
From my writing:
Byzantine Encryption‐Hayekian Compression Of a Machiavellian Field
[QUOTE=Soaker Patoshi
]
On the Blind Leading the Blind
https://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/rob/Courses/I...
Szabo explains ‘blind signatures’ encapsulated in this formula:
[QUOTE=Szabo] Meet the greatest simple equation since e=mc2
gSf(m) = S(m)
[/QUOTE]
The example is commutative encryption. The idea is each encryption layer is indifferent to each other layer. The order doesn’t matter. Szabo give the example of tricking someone into signing a blank check:
[QUOTE=Szabo]
The genius behind this discovery: cryptography guru David Chaum.
The brilliance lies in step 3: Chaum discovered that some signatures have the property of being "commutative" with the blinding functions:
Alice can strip off the blinding in the reverse order which the blinding and signature were applied, leaving just Alice's signature of n.
It is as if Alice put a piece of carbon paper inside the envelope![/QUOTE][/QUOTE]
Later we will talk about how its built already and who built it, because it wasn't me.
I don't mind being called button so crossnerd doesn't have to step in, I only minded the unbalanced moderation. It was less frustrating when I saw the truth of it, which I knew of course, but its a human thing.
My brown fedora with a red hat band was stolen. Not from here. I'm going after it though because I want it back.
[QUOTE=Szabo]Meet the greatest simple equation since e=mc2
gSf(m) = S(m)
The genius behind this discovery: cryptography guru David Chaum.
The brilliance lies in step 3: Chaum discovered that some signatures have the property of being "commutative" with the blinding functions:
Alice can strip off the blinding in the reverse order which the blinding and signature were applied, leaving just Alice's signature of n.
It is as if Alice put a piece of carbon paper inside the envelope![/QUOTE]
So look at this. Szabo is widely held as on of the top, best of the best etc. You can't convince most people he's not Satoshi.
Look at the equation he's comparing to our formalization of light/energy. What the hell is so important about Chaum's formalization of commutative cryptography?
[QUOTE=Ideal Poker](All over the world varieties of sites make claims to have systems very properly or even ideally devoted to the interests of the professional or recreational players of those sites and always an externally located critic can argue that the site is actually a sort of despotism
PSFTCIAFBIDOJ implicitly always have the argument that some good managers can do things of beneficial value, operating with the skins, and that it is not needed or appropriate for the players or the “customers" of the chips supplied by the site to actually understand, while the managers are managing, what exactly they are doing and how itwill affect the “ROI" circumstances of these players.
I see this as analogous to how the PSFTCIAFBIDOJ were claiming to provide something much better than Ponzi schemes that they could not deny existed in all other sites.
[/QUOTE]
Remember I said these people have sold the lie that BAD poker is GOOD poker and GOOD poker is BAD poker. So we ask is Doug Polk a moral poker player?
Doug was famous iirc for a challenge where we was going to build his bank roll from microstakes to highstakes as grind.
Iirc he stopped that grind. What did he realize? I think he realized something and he lied to the players about it.
Remember I said these people have sold the lie that BAD poker is GOOD poker and GOOD poker is BAD poker. So we ask is Doug Polk a moral poker player?
Doug was famous iirc for a challenge where we was going to build his bank roll from microstakes to highstakes as grind.
Iirc he stopped that grind. What did he realize? I think he realized something and he lied to the players about it.
Probably realised that playing thousands of microstakes hands when you're a millionaire is boring as ****.
Probably realised that playing thousands of microstakes hands when you're a millionaire is boring as ****.
No thats not it. He realized something and he lied to the players about it for the rest of his career. And now hes calling out OTHER casinos for THEIR security leaks while he hides his own casinos leaks.
Mason would know what it is-its a very sneaky or nuanced truth.
You tell em liv!
Liv is now giving talks on how AI works
I wonder if she knows its not AI.
Lets look for an game that rewards honest players Liv. Lets look together...lets bring Diogenes he'll know how to find an honest game:
[QUOTE=rewards ] He used to stroll about in full daylight with a lamp; when asked what he was doing, he would answer, "I am looking for a man."[23]Modern sources often say that Diogenes was looking for an "honest man", but in ancient sources he is simply "looking for a man" – "ἄνθρωπον ζητῶ".[24] This has been interpreted to mean that, in his view, the unreasoning behavior of the people around him meant that they did not qualify as men. Diogenes looked for a man but reputedly found nothing but rascals and scoundrels.[25] [/QUOTE]
No thats not fair. Its not circles. I have to speak esoterically. I was always forced to. That could change.
Also me and Nash are both known for what SEEMS like irrelevant side streets but then turn out to be incredibly tangentially relevant information. You can watch norm MacDonald do it too. He's brilliant at it.
And I have to give each post its own self containing context to some extent.
In regard to the doug thing, well we hope to give players a chance to defend their morality, but doug I guess isn't coming. He doesn't talk joey anymore? Do you all understand why Joey was here? He doesn't know whats in the mod forums. So he wanted to know how much trouble he could get into and how much is aimed at him.
Thats a tell right.
Anyways, with respect to the doug story we can look at my own poker experience. Without any context otherwise...at some point my backer said "You have to move down..." and obviously my response was to point out how certain I am that I'm profitable at my level...but I got concerned when I couldn't explain the variance math to my backer....my backer didn't understand it...
You see the problem was, its quite easy to show, you COULDN'T make a living in the next lower stakes (not even the top earners), and FAR more importantly, you can't have a reasonably EXPECTATION of MOVING up, even if you are a top player you see.
Thats the hidden nuance. So we can argue this a little. Let me state it boldly so we are clear...
Doug didn't understand the variance math...he thought he was the best heads up player around...and he would just go boink, bink, boink, boink, bink...and ta da...."I'm doug polker and I just showed how its down"...
Thats not what happened is it? Thats because sites structure the games against such things.
Do I misremember the story...Doug you come correct me.
It rigs the effective/hidden rake DUCY?
Man, I can only imagine the conversations you had with your backer.
Boink bink.
