Biggest loser in online poker history wants to grind $16k
I start this with some pictures:
nl2 -$8792.18 -82 buy ins below EV
nl5 (notice that pt4 shows party poker nl5 as nl4) -$5943.81
nl10 -$773.92 -15 buy ins below EV
Total loss -$15509.91
This is me playing nl2, nl5 and nl10 on party poker for one year.
My history begins somewhere in same period when they started to show WSOP shows in television. I think I have played 12-13 years nows mainly NL2, some amount of NL5 and little bit of NL10 what is the biggest stake i've ever played.
I've read all Sklansky, all Harrington, all Miller, watched huge amount of videos, bought trackers and calculators.
Still after those years and after that all I've lost huge amount of money on those stakes. I try to play my best but losing to huge suckouts like 95/5 favorite makes me really upset.
I've lost literally all my money including all my life savings to online poker. I want to try one last time to win those money back and little bit of extra. That's why $16k. What I need is support and guiding.
I had thread on micro forum but they deleted it just when people start to understand that this is real situation and not fake.
And if you wonder where that biggest loser comes from it was said by guy who has been playing for living many years. He said I'm the biggest loser in history counted as lost buy ins.
Those are only told in fairy tales. There are not a thing or person called winning reg at those stakes I'm playing. In fact my winnings come from players who's stats are very tight and someone might think they are winning. They might be regs because they play so much and regularly but they play so cards open that it's way easier to play against them than playing against massive whale with massive stats. My definition to them is tight whale.
So it's the same EXTREMELY losing style you've been playing for 15 years then? It's time to improve or stop playing/donating Paisting.
Check out last month hands between 4500-9100. That skyrocketing was against players with stats like 14/11. They bet small and I bet big, they check I shove, they mimic solvers I won't. My biggest winning strikes comes against players who play open cards. Those are hand chart guys, they fold fold fold to get that hand that is on chart. I wait to they get hand and then take their money. They are called tight whales.
would you please post a lifetime graph? i imagine the thread would go wild and grow in popularity by doing so.
Check out last month hands between 4500-9100. That skyrocketing was against players with stats like 14/11. They bet small and I bet big, they check I shove, they mimic solvers I won't. My biggest winning strikes comes against players who play open cards. Those are hand chart guys, they fold fold fold to get that hand that is on chart. I wait to they get hand and then take their money. They are called tight whales.
I guarantee there isn’t a solver on the planet that recommends playing 14/11. Sure, there’s an argument to be made that solver-approved stats can vary based on table dynamics, but the deviation never swings so far toward tight that it resembles full-ring stats in a six-handed game. In fact, if someone followed GTOWizard preflop charts and had even a basic understanding of postflop heuristics, they’d crush you. It’s ironic that you accuse these players of playing “face-up” when GTO ranges actually involve far more action mixing than whatever strategy you’re using. Take, for example, the GTO response to the big blind holding AKo facing a middle position 4-bet — it includes a mix of calls, 5-bets, and shoves at varying frequencies. How is that “face-up”? Or are you trying to say that your edge comes from deliberately playing unexpected ranges — like using a polar range in a spot where a linear one is standard? If so, that’s arguably even worse.
As for your claim about tight players, I’d argue that tight is exactly how one should play to exploit your style. Based on what you’ve said, you seem to play the exact opposite of how one should approach a tight-aggressive player. If I saw someone playing 14/11 at a six-max table, I’d bet small at a high frequency — easy bluffs, lots of folds, and minimal investment when I get raised or shoved on. But if you’re constantly betting big into TAGs, eventually they’re going to call you down — and when they do, you’ll be crushed in terms of equity.
good luck Paisting!
