President Donald Trump

President Donald Trump

I assume it's still acceptable to have a Trump thread in a Politics forum?

So this is an obvious lie - basically aimed at

105 Views
28 April 2019 at 04:18 AM
Reply...

39493 Replies


Earlier posts are available on our legacy forum HERE

he's a rapist she's a rapist they're a rapist we're all a rapist who's to judge a rapist. genocide


by Gorgonian

Here's how easy it is, though: if he is LOCK HIM UP INSTANTLY. It's hilarious you guys think I care about democrat politicians.

Going to be tough when federal prosecutors don't realize you have to get all members of the grand jury to vote on the version of the indictment you present in court.


by Crossnerd

The prosecution rate for rape claims is abysmal though… conviction rate in the ****ing toilet. Women know at this point that the courts don’t bring justice to survivors of rape and sexual assault.

You’re a woman and you watch high-profile cases like Brock Turner and Jesse Butler, tell me why you’d ever trust the courts for a rape claim. I ****ing wouldn’t.

It depends in part on what you mean by conviction rate. If you mean convictions as a percentage of actual crimes that occur, then you are absolutely correct. If you are talking about cases that actually go to a jury, then the disparity is far less significant.

The attrition mainly occurs at two spots in the chain. Rape is reported less often than other serious crimes, for mostly understandable reasons. And rape cases that are reported are prosecuted less frequently than other serious crimes. The latter phenomenon is partly a function of bias and partly a function of risk aversion among prosecutors. Reported rape cases as a group are harder to prosecute than other types of serious crimes. Physical evidence very often is lacking, and the prosecution often is very dependent on the testimony of the victim. To state the obvious, you don't have to be an intrinsically good witness in order to be the victim of a crime. Weak witnesses are easier to work with in cases with a lot of corroborating evidence and harder to work with in cases without much corroborating evidence. I guess we could take the view that prosecutors shouldn't care about the chances of conviction if they believe that a crime actually occurred. But in the real world they do, both for personal reasons and because prosecutor's offices don't have unlimited resources.


by Gorgonian

Intentionally and brazenly, of course.So than you would admit that Biden and Obama should as well. As Obama ignored the constitution and killed a US citizen without due process and Biden ignored a Supreme Court ruling on forgiving student loans and tried a end around Trump obviously is, Biden is but less so by a considerable margin. I don't know much about canadian politics bec

Lets be clear as well if I was an American I would have voted for Hilary and not sure on Joe but never Trump but could not vote for Kamal and would have voted third party.

I think Trump should be in jail for Trump University and would have voted to impeach him the second time they tried but not the first .

I also thought Trump would be better for Canada than Kamala and have admitted multiple times I was wrong


by lozen

Lets be clear as well if I was an American I would have voted for Hilary and not sure on Joe but never Trump but could not vote for Kamal and would have voted third party.I think Trump should be in jail for Trump University and would have voted to impeach him the second time they tried but not the first . I also thought Trump would be better for Canada than Kamala and have admi

lozen,

I know you have said this multiple times. The bottom line is that, based on your entire body of work, people simply don't believe you. I don't believe you.


by Crossnerd

Tara Reade was an imperfect victim, and this very predictably influenced public reaction, credibility judgments, and media narratives. They were never going to believe a woman with an evolving account and delayed disclosure, despite these both being trademark behavioral patterns of survivors of sexual assault. The same accusations are routinely levied against E. Jean Carroll, a

Amazing post, actually thought it was a roccoco post, then I saw your name on the next post quote (tired and reading on my phone).
So out of character.

Anyway, spot on post, agree completely.


most all of the nut****job people that defend ****tardTACO till the end of time, eventually get to...

"...but I'm not an American, so...."

yes. you are not. so **** off and go jerk off to your own shitty business in you own shitty life.


by Rococo

lozen,

I know you have said this multiple times. The bottom line is that, based on your entire body of work, people simply don't believe you. I don't believe you.

Lozen as there is no point in engaging you, please understand that this post perfectly encapsulates every post you have and will ever make


by Rococo

lozen,
I know you have said this multiple times. The bottom line is that, based on your entire body of work, people simply don't believe you. I don't believe you.

That’ll happen when you switch back and forth between I’m not a constitutional scholar to I think he should be in jail based on mood.


Erm I'm not American, is it ok if I stick around and denigrate the useless cockwomble pedo rapist grifter babyman fisherman-murdering misogynist pedo pussy-grabbing sex-pest who fancies his own daughter Epstein accomplice pedo nonce ponce unspeakable insufferable simpleton pedo bag of dogshit conman vomitous future Hague detainee ****-ass nappy-wearing pedo cotton-candy-haired fat pedo orange Russian asset hooker-marrying pedo quockerwodger?


I mean, **** me, his total non-comprehension of percentages is a crime against humanity on its own, never mind the rest.


by diebitter

I mean, **** me, his total non-comprehension of percentages is a crime against humanity on its own, never mind the rest.

There are no serious people who support or defend Trump.


by diebitter

I mean, **** me, his total non-comprehension of percentages is a crime against humanity on its own, never mind the rest.

Aren't you the fella who doesn't believe that .9 recurring and 1 are the same number? Both 100%, bruv.


99.9 recurring percent he is.


by jalfrezi

99.9 recurring percent he is.

So not 100%?

Spoiler
Show

😉


by lozen

Do you believe Bill Clinton is a pedophile and rapist ?

Not everyone thinks like you .
This is where u differentiate cultist like you from others .

It’s not because u like someone he should be absolve of all crimes ….~> regular person thinks like this !

Ps: look at Victor too, coming here claiming the SU and Stalin were great honorable people , cant even acknowledge the genocide he was responsible of .


by lozen

Do you believe Bill Clinton is a pedophile and rapist ?

I do.


by weeeez

So out of character.

…?

This is a topic that I care about. I really hate the way sexual assault has become a partisan issue.


by Rococo

It depends in part on what you mean by conviction rate. If you mean convictions as a percentage of actual crimes that occur, then you are absolutely correct. If you are talking about cases that actually go to a jury, then the disparity is far less significant. .

Yes, the bolded. I should have clarified.


by diebitter

Erm I'm not American, is it ok if I stick around and denigrate the useless cockwomble pedo rapist grifter babyman fisherman-murdering misogynist pedo pussy-grabbing sex-pest who fancies his own daughter Epstein accomplice pedo nonce ponce unspeakable insufferable simpleton pedo bag of dogshit conman vomitous future Hague detainee ****-ass nappy-wearing pedo cotton-candy-haire

Yes


by lozen

Lets be clear as well if I was an American I would have voted for Hilary and not sure on Joe but never Trump but could not vote for Kamal and would have voted third party.I think Trump should be in jail for Trump University and would have voted to impeach him the second time they tried but not the first . I also thought Trump would be better for Canada than Kamala and have admi

Lies .
but I won’t go through all your posting to prove it .
I’m done beating a dead horse .
Like rococo said , your body of work speak for itself .


by diebitter

Erm I'm not American, is it ok if I stick around and denigrate the useless cockwomble pedo rapist grifter babyman fisherman-murdering misogynist pedo pussy-grabbing sex-pest who fancies his own daughter Epstein accomplice pedo nonce ponce unspeakable insufferable simpleton pedo bag of dogshit conman vomitous future Hague detainee ****-ass nappy-wearing pedo cotton-candy-haire

I think that's an exaggeration


So Hegseth gettin the spotlight on him for murderous orders. Wonder what comes first?

- Trump throws the lush under the bus?
- War starts with Venezeula cos oil, sorry I mean drugs

I'm thinking the second is more likely, the way these morons love to double down.


by chezlaw

I think that's an exaggeration

just replace words with 'pedo pedo pedo', see if that works for you.


by Gorgonian

Certainly not as effective as it should be, I agree. I would argue that he came much closer to being removed during that last impeachment than I thought he would. Several Republicans voted to remove, resulting in an easy majority (just not enough to reach the threshold). I think there is a much higher desire to end the Trump era in Congress now than there was then.

Desired enough to get 67 votes?

Reply...