Moderation Questions
The last iteration of the moderation discussion thread was a complete disaster. Numerous attempts to keep it on topic fa
I wouldn't have personally made the ban, no.
I've almost flexed on fgators in a moment of indulgence but resisted
I wouldn't have personally made the ban, no.
I've almost flexed on fgators in a moment of indulgence but resisted
do you agree that my claim "we don't need to discuss the reasons why" those outcome exists, in the context of the argument i was making, wasn't racist at all not even in the slightest, not even vaguely, not even tangentially? it was just a logic argument related to the fact that the reason(s) for those gaps are completly irrelevant to discuss the contribution of state policy to those gaps IF those gaps exist both in democratic and republican states.
A very reasonable, normal, logical take that no one could be offended from right?
do you agree that my claim "we don't need to discuss the reasons why" those outcome exists, in the context of the argument i was making, wasn't racist at all not even in the slightest, not even vaguely, not even tangentially? it was just a logic argument related to the fact that the reason(s) for those gaps are completly irrelevant to discuss the contribution of state policy to
The problenm is that your chain of argument has glaring logical gaps that can't really be explained by anything other than an obvious agenda.
Saying that governance can't effect socioeconomic conditions and that obesity rates are entirely explainable by race is, uncontroversially, a moronic claim unsupported by any evidence. You needed a timeout for your dogmatic idiocy.
King Spew had to close the Trump thread due to your racist musings. Then you brought them in here. What did you think was going to happen exactly?
do you agree that my claim "we don't need to discuss the reasons why" those outcome exists, in the context of the argument i was making, wasn't racist at all not even in the slightest, not even vaguely, not even tangentially? it was just a logic argument related to the fact that the reason(s) for those gaps are completly irrelevant to discuss the contribution of state policy to
I think you knew that insisting to stress the issue would likely catch you a ban.
I think there is a time and place for every discussion and it’s been proven time and time again that this is no place for many discussions
It was worth a shot.
Use your prophet powers, craig
CN,
Watch this clip:
https://youtu.be/NrrPZ3O2jFM?si=bllbKF41...
He is a broken man, but she brings him to life through her belief in him. She is the Divine Female, and a piece of her exists within you.
It’s less than 5 minutes. Don’t think just watch it, go.
CN,
Watch this clip:
https://youtu.be/NrrPZ3O2jFM?si=bllbKF41...
He is a broken man, but she brings him to life through her belief in him. She is the Divine Female, and a piece of her exists within you.
It’s less than 5 minutes. Don’t think just watch it, go.
My brother in Christ, on a scale of 1 to 10, how much success do you think your attempts at proselytising atheists on this forum are likely to meet? Peace be upon you.
Wasn’t there a Karen read thread about the case?
goat car chase move
CN,
Watch this clip:
https://youtu.be/NrrPZ3O2jFM?si=bllbKF41...
He is a broken man, but she brings him to life through her belief in him. She is the Divine Female, and a piece of her exists within you.
It’s less than 5 minutes. Don’t think just watch it, go.
I watched this, meditated upon it, and I am now a Christian. Thank you, and God bless.
My brother in Christ, on a scale of 1 to 10, how much success do you think your attempts at proselytising atheists on this forum are likely to meet? Peace be upon you.
TEN
if I'm any indication, anyway
I watched this, meditated upon it, and I am now a Christian. Thank you, and God bless.
TEN
if I'm any indication, anyway
Next, become a Non-Christian:
Spoiler
The older brother is the Christian. The younger brother is the Non-Christian.
The older brother represents the firstborn son and rightful heir. The younger brother is the rejected one, an afterthought destined for hell.
There is nothing the enemy fears more than when the two brothers take on the identity of the other and unify. The enemy panics and uses bribes in order to transform the unified two back into the singular firstborn.
A house divided cannot stand, but if the two make peace in the same house, mountains can be moved.
If you feel resistance to the Christian story, then you know the younger brother.
ItÂ’s a miracle for the Non-Christian to will his way through the resistance and navigate through the story. Life counts on this miracle.
A Non-Christian must self identify as Non-Christian.
A ChristianÂ’s primary relationship is with their understanding of Christ; A Non-ChristianÂ’s primary relationship is with the self.
A Non-Christian takes the Christian story seriously and holds it as potentially true but has at least one foot outside of it.
The Non-Christian has an intimation that there is only one story which endures, and if he wants his loved ones to live across time, then he must figure out for them how to unite with the one story.
Being a Non-Christian means you acknowledge that navigating through the Christian story is required in order to pass through the great filter.
It means you realize the Christian story is not optional.
The common person has no category for the Non-Christian who truly lives a high faith life. The two might as well be different species.
I look away for 24 hours and now you guys are in a cult.
