[extracted] New(?) 9-11 stuff
KSM got a plea deal. The guy who supposedly masterminded the 9/11 attacks is not getting the death penalty.
If you still
Wat?
Tap Out Cone,Refining Flux,Ceramic Foam Filter,Aluminum Cast Materials
Are you trying to say that you think aluminum does glow orange when it melts? I know you are terrified to establish any fact base. You think every question I ask is a trap. And it is. But when you fall through this trap you will actually be in a better place.
No idea, just googled "molten aluminium" and some of the images looked silvery and some looked orange/red as above. Probably depends on the temperature. I've asked you at least half a dozen times how you knew it was steel and not aluminium, and this is the first time you mentioned anything about the colour or glow. Why is this?
I've answered your question, now you answer mine. Where in the FEMA report is there mention of molten steel? Link to report and page number please, thanks.
No idea, just googled "molten aluminium" and some of the images looked silvery and some looked orange/red as above. Probably depends on the temperature. I've asked you at least half a dozen times how you knew it was steel and not aluminium, and this is the first time you mentioned anything about the colour or glow. Why is this?I've answered your question, now you answer mine. W
Dueces will likely psychobabble his way out of providing a link.
Deuces never actually responds to anything anyone asks or says. He doesn't discuss so much as preaches. IRL he is the sort of person who doesn't have a conversation with you, he just waits for his turn to speak, and if he actually ends up responding to something you said, it's by accident rather than design. And given that he's hopelessly besotted with the sound of his own voice, you can probably consider yourself lucky if he does actually wait for his turn rather than talking over you mid-sentence.
Just to recap, you are saying the video of molten metal pouring out of the south tower was aluminum.
Can you please quote where I said that?
We can move on to your other questions after you do that.
Also, were you planning to post the link to that fema report of molten steel? If not, why did you lie about it existing?
I was more interested the fake pilots but that was also interesting.Do you think someone who knows Ghislane Maxwell and works with her and has written a conspiracy book is more likely to be a conspiracy theorist or a misinformation agent?And do you think that people like Maxwell and the people she talks to make time to write joke emails that have no apparent punchlines? These a
A lot of independent thinking going on here. Unfortunately, it is all dumb but I will bite: why is the fake pilot important and what do you know about the author of the email?
I think the big problem is that the 9/11 commission was non-experts (elected officials) and no one really gives a sht what they think.
You obviously haven’t processed the clear and convincing evidence that Deuces has provided that this report was the work of the shadow commission, not the actual 911 commission.
Can you please quote where I said that?
We can move on to your other questions after you do that.
I had mistakenly left the question mark off the end of my sentence. I meant to ask whether you are saying that the metal pouring out was aluminum, not establish that you did say that.
Is that what you think?
You obviously haven’t processed the clear and convincing evidence that Deuces has provided that this report was the work of the shadow commission, not the actual 911 commission.
ghislaine didn't seem worried about the outcome of the commission. I think you, and most people, would be pretty shocked at what is actually in that report and what the participants on the commission have said about it.
Still no comment on the report saying it doesn't matter who funded the attacks. These people who have covered this up, I can admit they are more adept than me. I would never think, in a million years, I could say something like that and just get away with it. But they, I suppose, know the limits of what people like you will accept. I'm starting to think there is no limit.
I had mistakenly left the question mark off the end of my sentence. I meant to ask whether you are saying that the metal pouring out was aluminum, not establish that you did say that.
Is that what you think?
I am not interested in making a claim about what was pouring out of the building. I am asking you for evidence of YOUR claim. I am not required to make a counter-claim. YOU are required to present positive evidence for YOUR claim.
Are you going to give us the link to the FEMA report of molten steel or not? If not, why did you lie about it existing?
That might be the first intelligent thing you've said in all these pages.
My understanding is you are defending the official story and I'm saying that story is false. Proving something false is a thing to do.
That might be the first intelligent thing you've said in all these pages.
My understanding is you are defending the official story and I'm saying that story is false. Proving something false is a thing to do.
Another evasion by Deucey-the-Dodger.
Why can't you provide the link? *
*I have to confess that my question is disingenuous , because we all know if you actually HAD a link you would have shared it some time ago.
Oh man, was Deuces caught lying again? This is shocking. Arrogant, obnoxious, bloviating, dishonest. You got any redeeming features, Deuces? Never mind, it's a rhetorical question.
Half right. It was definitely intelligent to not allow you to shift your burden of proof to me. You're too stupid to realize how badly outclassed you are in every interaction you have with everyone here but Billy, though, so, no, it's not the first.
My understanding is you are defending the official story and I'm saying that story is false. Proving something false is a thing to do.
Neat. Repeating. Are you planning to give us a link to the fema report claiming molten steel at ground zero? If not, why did you lie to us about the existence of this report?
That discomfort you feel after reading this is something you should explore. Note that I've never once felt that when responding to you.
Half right. It was definitely intelligent to not allow you to shift your burden of proof to me. You're too stupid to realize how badly outclassed you are in every interaction you have with everyone here but Billy, though, so, no, it's not the first. Neat. Repeating. Are you planning to give us a link to the fema report claiming molten steel at ground zero? If not, why did you l
I just came across a youtube video that used a phrase which I am definitely stealing for my repertoire and instantly made me think of Deuces (and Billy): "Ah, it's the rare and elusive proof by emphatic assertion".
Here's the video if that sort of thing floats your boat:
ha I would slightly amend it for our particular brand of dumb we have to endure:
"Proof by emphatic assertion and reassertion."
The video title alone is sending me so I'm definitely going to watch that. hahaha proof by just look at it
edit: hahahaha it really was "proof by just look at it" I'm crying.
at 6:20 did that mfer really say accreat
why does printing out reddit posts and comments feel so diabolical
ha I would slightly amend it for our particular brand of dumb we have to endure:"Proof by emphatic assertion and reassertion."The video title alone is sending me so I'm definitely going to watch that. hahaha proof by just look at itedit: hahahaha it really was "proof by just look at it" I'm crying.at 6:20 did that mfer really say accreatwhy does printing out reddit posts and co
I mean, Billy's case for dustification was pretty much also "proof by just look at it".
Quora has a lot of the same - cranks who have "proved" the Collatz conjecture, or even the Riemann Hypothesis, or the Billy types who have discovered the one thing mathematicians don't want you to know (which is almost always that you don't need irrational numbers). Some of the responses and comments there are great too.
Collatz is 3n+1 right? Been awhile. Might be fun to read some attempts at "proving" that.
It is. Have at it: https://www.quora.com/Why-cant-people-ac.... I'm sure you can click your way around from there.
ghislaine didn't seem worried about the outcome of the commission. I think you, and most people, would be pretty shocked at what is actually in that report and what the participants on the commission have said about it.Still no comment on the report saying it doesn't matter who funded the attacks. These people who have covered this up, I can admit they are more adept than me. I
Why would ghislaine be worried about the outcome of the commission? Why do you think I would be pretty shocked at what is actually in that report and what the participants on the commission have said about it?
Why do you think there is no limit on what people will accept when none of us accept your unsubstantiated facts, beliefs or theories here and are constantly asking you for evidence? The only person here that has limitless gullibility is you,
Have you noticed the pattern of Deuces disappearing for days at a time each time I hold his feet to the fire about the molten steel canard?
With Deucy-the-Dodger and Billy gone, maybe Luckbox can fill in for awhile.
@Luckbox Inc
