Capitol attack and 6th of January hearings
VP was rushed off the floor by Secret service.
Senate is on lockdown.
Terrorists have breached barricades and appear to be
To guard the Capitol and protect fake electors and Pence if the VP agreed to the steal the election plan.
LOL For someone complaining about bad faith posting in the mod thread you sure spout a lot of bullshit.
Are you pretending like there wasn't a fake elector scheme lol? They've already pled guilty. Or do you think all those crimes were committed by Trump, his lawyers and the fake electors with no intent whatsoever to steal the election?
Are you pretending like there wasn't a fake elector scheme lol? They've already pled guilty. Or do you think all those crimes were committed by Trump, his lawyers and the fake electors with no intent whatsoever to steal the election?
Please tell me, which crimes has Trump been convicted of relating to the election exactly? Surely a poster of such good faith as yourself wouldn't be making stuff up now would you.
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/congres...
President Donald Trump wanted National Guard troops in Washington to protect his supporters at a Jan. 6 rally that ended with them attacking the U.S. Capitol, leaving five dead, Trump's former Pentagon chief testified on Wednesday.
Former Acting Defense Secretary Christopher Miller told a House of Representatives panel that he spoke with Trump on Jan. 3, three days before the now-former president's fiery speech that preceded the violence and led to his second impeachment.
According to Miller's testimony, Trump asked during that meeting whether the District of Columbia's mayor had requested National Guard troops for Jan. 6, the day Congress was to ratify Joe Biden's presidential election victory.
Trump told Miller to "fill" the request, the former defense secretary testified. Miller said Trump told him: "Do whatever is necessary to protect demonstrators that were executing their constitutionally protected rights."
Miller testified that the U.S. military was deliberately restrained that day when Trump's rally turned into an assault by hundreds of his followers that left five dead, including a Capitol Police officer.
Please tell me, which crimes has Trump been convicted of relating to the election exactly? Surely a poster of such good faith as yourself wouldn't be making stuff up now would you.
Trump's lawyers and the fake electors have been convicted of crimes and will testify against Trump, who has been charged. I know there is a red/blue divide in education but did you really not know this? It's always crazy to me how the other half lives, as someone who never talks to a typical Trumper.
Please tell me, which crimes has Trump been convicted of relating to the election exactly? Surely a poster of such good faith as yourself wouldn't be making stuff up now would you.
I know Trumpets live in a universe of alternative facts, but JFC, you embarrass yourself more and more every time you hit that "post" button. Clown make up fully on for sure.
Trump's lawyers and the fake electors have been convicted of crimes and will testify against Trump, who has been charged. I know there is a red/blue divide in education but did you really not know this? It's always crazy to me how the other half lives, as someone who never talks to a typical Trumper.
So, you can't name any electoral crimes Trump has been convicted of. Which means you lied. Thanks for confirming. I take it you will now go off to the mod thread and complain about yourself then, just to be consistent. Lol
I never said Trump was convicted of any crimes. Is there a reason besides poor reading ability/general conservative brain disease that you seem to think I did?
I approve of "conservative brain disease" and have made a mental note to use it in casual conversation.
I never said Trump was convicted of any crimes. Is there a reason besides poor reading ability/general conservative brain disease that you seem to think I did?
You said "all those crimes were committed by trump". In order to state that as a fact you need to provide proof that he committed crimes. i.e a conviction in a court of law.
Otherwise you are lying. I would have thought that shouldn't be too difficult to understand, even for someone like you. Now scurry off to the mod thread and file a complaint about yourself. There's a good chap.
Lolllllllllll Uhhhh no. That's not how the law or just basic words in general work. Like just go read Trump's indictment. It says he committed crimes. He has not been convicted in a court of law. In fact that happens basically every time someone is convicted; they are first publicly accused. I always think it's funny that no matter how dumb a Trumper is, they never have to worry about lowering people's estimation of conservatism.
Lolllllllllll Uhhhh no. That's not how the law or just basic words in general work. Like just go read Trump's indictment. It says he committed crimes. He has not been convicted in a court of law. In fact that happens basically every time someone is convicted; they are first publicly accused. I always think it's funny that no matter how dumb a Trumper is, they never have to worry about lowering people's estimation of conservatism.
Lol... Accused doesn't mean committed. You don't seem to understand basic words yourself. Also indirect insults are still insults whether you word them in such a way as to avoid bans or not.
Anyway I've had enough of this nonsense and your insults so you can claim a win or not. I could care less.
So the indictment, that clearly says he committed crimes is a "lie".... and I guess every indictment is a lie. Just genius level stuff dude.
1 liar within the Trump campaign said something about ensuring the process of certification? You're a propagandized fool
All of the testimony before the Jan 6th committee to investigate what happened at the Capitol, buttressed by countless Trump administration insiders. Nah. 1 slob eons later said something
So the indictment, that clearly says he committed crimes is a "lie".... and I guess every indictment is a lie. Just genius level stuff dude.
Well, obviously it's beyond your IQ level but here's a simple explanation for you.
If Someone Is Indicted, Are They Guilty?
When a grand jury indicts someone, that does not mean they are guilty of the crime(s) they have been indicted for. Instead, it means there is probable cause for the prosecutor to proceed with formal criminal charges.
The prosecutor still needs to prove the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a criminal trial in order for the defendant to be found guilty. The defendant will also have a chance to present a defense during a criminal trial, unlike during typical grand jury proceedings.
1 liar within the Trump campaign said something about ensuring the process of certification? You're a propagandized fool
All of the testimony before the Jan 6th committee to investigate what happened at the Capitol, buttressed by countless Trump administration insiders. Nah. 1 slob eons later said something
It was actually said in testimony given to the Jan 6 committee.
OK. Nice mitigating circumstance or something
Well, obviously it's beyond your IQ level but here's a simple explanation for you.
I used the exact same language as the indictment, which is that Trump committed crimes. That’s completely standard usage. You not being bright enough to get it doesn’t make it a lie.
I used the exact same language as the indictment, which is that Trump committed crimes. That’s completely standard usage. You not being bright enough to get it doesn’t make it a lie.
Lol. You didn't mention the indictment in the post where you said Trump committed crimes. Now that you got caught out lying you are trying to slither out of it by hiding behind language used in the indictment. Which is kind of pathetic really but not surprising as it's typical behavior of people like you.
Anyway there's not much point continuing a conversation with a liar so I'll leave it at that.
Can you show us where he was convicted of lying in a court of law?
Well, obviously it's beyond your IQ level but here's a simple explanation for you.
If Someone Is Accused of Lying, Are They Guilty?
When someone is accused of lying, that does not mean they are guilty of lying Instead, it means there is probable cause to believe they may have lied.
The accuser still needs to prove the defendant lied beyond a reasonable doubt in a criminal trial in order for the defendant to be found guilty of lying. The defendant will also have a chance to present a defense during a criminal trial, unlike during typical grand jury proceedings.
