Israel/Palestine thread

Israel/Palestine thread

Think this merits its own thread...

Discuss my fellow 2+2ers..

AM YISRAEL CHAI.

[QUOTE=Crossnerd]

07 October 2023 at 09:33 PM
Reply...

43274 Replies


Earlier posts are available on our legacy forum HERE

by Victor

gonna need you to show your work on where I have ever said anything to the sort.

I said you were a half-step away, my man. I didn't say you where there just yet. These words I use have actual content, they're not just twitter memes I post reflexively.


In the way of what? Part of the attackers arrived via road.

Areas between core protected areas and the surrounding landscape or seascape which protect the network from potentially damaging external influences and which are essentially transitional areas.

Are you saying that Israel planned the concert so that civilians would be in the way of an area they wanted to protect and Hamas would have to go through that area?


by Trolly McTrollson

I said you were a half-step away, my man. I didn't say you where there just yet. These words I use have actual content, they're not just twitter memes I post reflexively.

I am not sure how you can reconcile a brilliantly planned and executed attack as a false flag. I never said the Israelis planned it. the Resistance did. they beat Israel on that day.


by Victor

they didnt deviate from the plan. they fully achieved the objectives of the plan.

I dont know why they went to the concert after defeating the Israeli defenses militarily.

They deviated. The attack on the festival occurred at 7am, along with the other attacks.

I think it's pretty safe to say that they went to the concert to kill civilians, because that's what they did and they had the power to choose to do anything else if they desired. Other areas they attacked were not military related either.


by Bluegrassplayer

They deviated. The attack on the festival occurred at 7am, along with the other attacks.

I think it's pretty safe to say that they went to the concert to kill civilians, because that's what they did and they had the power to choose to do anything else if they desired. Other areas they attacked were not military related either.

which other areas? the kibbutzes are military outposts.


by Victor

I am not sure how you can reconcile a brilliantly planned and executed attack as a false flag. I never said the Israelis planned it. the Resistance did. they beat Israel on that day.

I think i read that from hamas that oct 7 was in part due to resisting israels colonial expansion. If we take that in good faith, would that attack offer any opportunity of that actually happening. This is one of many things that i dont see being the actual objective. Becuaae israels response seems perfectly expected considering the vitriol and oct7 was literaly the perfect scenario for israel to accompliah what hamas claims it doesnt want.


by Dunyain

If your name was Ari Cohen you could travel in the WB as long as you didn't have an Israeli passport, or was it a matter of if your name was gentile enough they didn't ask too many questions about your genealogy? There is a difference. In quieter times my wife was traveling through Jordan/Syria and the group she was with actually went into Jerusalem and her group (clearly all

Israel stopped stamping passpirts in 2013 for this exact reason


by Victor

Oct 7 was a legitimate attack on military targets.

And microbet will read this and still say you aren't an antisemite

I mean posts like this mean you are either an antisemite or a complete moron. Not sure which


by Victor

which other areas? the kibbutzes are military outposts.

I'm pretty sure this is not true, at least not all of them. Don't really care to check though as it's not particularly important.

Really all of this is just a series of excuses for what is obviously an act of terrorism. To recap the list of excuses:

1. Not all of the targets were civilian
2. The main source of dead civilians was an opportunity that presented itself
3. IDF killed some of their own civilians,
4. Military were killed as well as civilians
5. its still questionable how much civilian murder they did

When asked to clarify why these are important, the reasoning isn't given. It's just that for some reason these things matter when determining if it's a terrorist attack or not.


by Bluegrassplayer

PW: point out the racism. Thanks.

Have you just met him

Israel evil white colonist
Gaza sweet brown victim
Anyone who disagrees is racist

Duh


by Trolly McTrollson

lol, Vic is a half a step away from claiming 10/7 was a false flag op, extraordinary.

I mean he's still denying the rapes


by PointlessWords

Concert was in the way

Civilian buffer zone if you will.

Nobody was armed at the concert. They weren't in the way. They were the plan the whole time. Hamas admits they planned to take HOSTAGES from the concert. They didn't say POWS they specifically said hostages.. as vic pointed out many times, hostages means civilians


by Victor

which other areas? the kibbutzes are military outposts.

No they aren't. My God you just lie


Kfar Aza is a kibbutz in southern Israel that has become an army base after a 2023 massacre by Hamas militants. The militants attacked the village from multiple directions, destroying the perimeter gate, killing residents, burning homes and cars, and using rocket-propelled grenades to force entry into homes. More than 100 civilians died, and others were kidnapped and held hostage. The Israel Defense Forces retook control of the village by October 11, 2023, and soldiers are still going through the community to recover bodies.

But Victor has his own time machine and is pretending it was a base and is justifying it

****ing beyond disgusting


Kibbutzes are basically communes. A Marxist like you should love them

Well except for the Jews living there part


Ya the "Oct 7 was a legitimate attack on military targets." line of thinking does 2 things:

1) It kills the thread, or any point in participating in it imho. We arrive at such a level of bad faith and such a powerful hose of lies that frankly I don't even get what we're doing here.

2) It makes me question moderation. Here we're inching into stuff like Holocaust denialism. We're so very very close to that. In a lot of workplaces, schools, etc, you'd be gone right now. Imagine me denying 5 digital Palestinian civilians were dead right now? That, is this. But the antisemitic way.

I can't believe that someone got banned for saying Gazans use their birthrates to help advance their cause (which nobody over there denies), but we're back at Oct 7th being a "military" operation.

I'm gonna take a week off y'all. This is just too disgusting.


by rafiki

Ya the "Oct 7 was a legitimate attack on military targets." line of thinking does 2 things:1) It kills the thread, or any point in participating in it imho. We arrive at such a level of bad faith and such a powerful hose of lies that frankly I don't even get what we're doing here.2) It makes me question moderation. Here we're inching into stuff like Holocaust denialism. We're

Yep. You are allowed to be an antisemitic pos but can't quote Arafat


I'm probably done for a while too.

Go **** yourself Victor you antisenetic lowlife


by rafiki

Ya the "Oct 7 was a legitimate attack on military targets." line of thinking does 2 things:1) It kills the thread, or any point in participating in it imho. We arrive at such a level of bad faith and such a powerful hose of lies that frankly I don't even get what we're doing here.2) It makes me question moderation. Here we're inching into stuff like Holocaust denialism. We're

the only denialism in this thread is Nakba and genocide denialism.

theres a reason you guys need to make up crap about me.


Denying Hamas’ retaliation attack was justified kills the thread

Saying it’s ok to kill 30k Palestinians cause 700 Israelis were killed shows you guys have no morals.

It’s pretty clear to people with morals that killing civilians is bad , an Israel is killing the most civilians out of the two people in this almost 100 year conflict


by metsandfinsfan

No they aren't. My God you just lie

its hard to read this article and not think so

https://archive.ph/CkEMe





you get the idea


by PointlessWords

Denying Hamas’ retaliation attack was justified kills the thread

Saying it’s ok to kill 30k Palestinians cause 700 Israelis were killed shows you guys have no morals.

It’s pretty clear to people with morals that killing civilians is bad , an Israel is killing the most civilians out of the two people in this almost 100 year conflict

to the ubermenschen, killing their lessers and slaves is acceptable and moral.


by PointlessWords

Denying Hamas’ retaliation attack was justified kills the thread

Saying it’s ok to kill 30k Palestinians cause 700 Israelis were killed shows you guys have no morals.

It’s pretty clear to people with morals that killing civilians is bad , an Israel is killing the most civilians out of the two people in this almost 100 year conflict

How do you suggest Israel kills Hamas people (tens of thousands at least just in Gaza) without killing civilians?

Do you agree killing Hamas people is proper, moral, advisable, good and every time one of them dies the world is a better place for anyone else?


I mean for gawds sake they are calling themselves Sparta now. you know, the society that would murder their Helots once a year to keep them oppressed and weak.


by Luciom

How do you suggest Israel kills Hamas people (tens of thousands at least just in Gaza) without killing civilians?

Do you agree killing Hamas people is proper, moral, advisable, good and every time one of them dies the world is a better place for anyone else?

The same way the US fought Iraq and Afghanistan. You pick up your balls and send your troops door to door with rifles, grenades and medivacs

Reply...