Israel/Palestine thread
Think this merits its own thread...
Discuss my fellow 2+2ers..
AM YISRAEL CHAI.
[QUOTE=Crossnerd]Edit: RULES FOR THIS THREAD
Posting guidelines for Politics and Soci...
These are our baselines. We're not reinventing the wheel here. If you aren't sure if something is acceptable to post, its better to ask first. If you think someone is posting something that violates the above guidelines, please report it or PM me rather than responding in kind.
To reiterate some of the points:
1. No personal attacks. This is a broad instruction, but, in general, we want to focus on attacking an argument rather than the poster making it. It is fine to say a post is antisemitic; it is not okay to call someone an antisemite over and over. If you believe someone is making antisemitic posts, report them or PM me. The same goes for calling people "baby killers" and "genocide lovers". You are allowed to argue that an action supports genocide or that the consequences of certain policies results in the death of children, but we are no longer going to be speaking to one another's intentions. It is not productive to the conversation and doesn't further any debate.
2. Racist posts and other bigoted statements that target a particular group or individuals of such groups with derogatory comments are not allowed. This should not need further explanation.
3. Graphic Images need to be in spoilers with a trigger warning.
4. Wishing Harm on other posters will result in an immediate timeout.
5. Genocidal statements such as "Kill 'em all" etc, are no longer permissible in the thread.
If anyone has any questions about the above, please PM me. I don't want a discussion about the rules to derail the content of this thread. If anything needs clarifying, I will do that in this thread.
Please be aware this thread is strictly moderated[/quote]
The other consideration that is relevant and somewhat supported is a question of whether or not Israel felt that the tunneling had gone too far and it was a do or die reaction from Isreal. It just doesn't make sense to me why they would throw their world reputation away over all this. My outlandish theory here tho is that the Hamas side has seismic technology that made it SEEM like they had crazy tunnels and the tunnels don't exist other than the small network found so far.
I can think of different things that are underground and existential for Israel in this regard.
Then this would be like a middle east Vietnam situation.
The other consideration that is relevant and somewhat supported is a question of whether or not Israel felt that the tunneling had gone too far and it was a do or die reaction from Isreal. It just doesn't make sense to me why they would throw their world reputation away over all this. My outlandish theory here tho is that the Hamas side has seismic technology that made it SEEM like they had crazy tunnels and the tunnels don't exist other than the small network found so far.
I can think of diffe
Israel is almost completely surrounded by enemies either actively attacking it, or threatening too. Maybe it is just a simple fact that Israel decided the threat from the South, both realized and potential, was too great so they decided to do something about it. And maybe 10/7 gave them the justification to do what certain segments of Israeli govt and society already wanted to do.
I could be wrong, but I suspect at the moment they are trying to destroy as much of Hamas's military infrastructure as possible, to neutralize the threat as much as possible in the short term; so they can move their focus to Hezbollah/Lebanon in the North without having to worry about the Southern border.
The last thing Israel needs is to worry about 20,000 missiles from Gaza, or even an invasion, during a major war with Lebanon in the North. And it looks like there is now no threat of this happening.
And I would not blame Israel at all if this was what was going on. I find it completely ridiculous that Israel has the ability to greatly neutralize the threats surrounding them and threatening their existential existence, and they are supposed to just turn the other cheek so as not to upset the Arab street and disrupt energy supply.
I think Israel should unapologetically secure their borders and neutralize the belligerents attacking them, as much as they have the ability to.
yeah, you're wrong. about almost everything
Israel is almost completely surrounded by enemies either actively attacking it, or threatening too. Maybe it is just a simple fact that Israel decided the threat from the South, both realized and potential, was too great so they decided to do something about it. And maybe 10/7 gave them the justification to do what certain segments of Israeli govt and society already wanted to do.
I could be wrong, but I suspect at the moment they are trying to destroy as much of Hamas's military infrastructu
Do you agree they are losing the favor of the world? My peers are VERY confused. How would an Israeli citizen feel if they found out that the IDF doesn't pick their own targets?
Do you agree they are losing the favor of the world? My peers are VERY confused. How would an Israeli citizen feel if they found out that the IDF doesn't pick their own targets?
I think the people making decisions now are calculating the benefit of neutering the threat from the South is worth losing favor, and probably also calculating that the world has a short memory and favor can be re-established down the road under more favorable security parameters.
I dont know if this calculation is correct or not, but it is reasonable IMO.
As far as whether Israel is using this war to test run AI in warfare, that is very possible. But I am missing whatever deeper implication you seem to think this indicates.
I think the people making decisions now are calculating the benefit of neutering the threat from the South is worth losing favor, and probably also calculating that the world has a short memory and favor can be re-established down the road under more favorable security parameters.
I dont know if this calculation is correct or not, but it is reasonable IMO.
As far as whether Israel is using this war to test run AI in warfare, that is very possible. But I am missing whatever deeper implication you
You aren't doing the thought experiment. Firstly its quite accepted and iirc it was internally leaked, so its IDF intel, they are using lavender to select its targets. I've come to understand for other reason how impossible that is to secure.
But think of the legality of it. If you are Israeli, don't you want to know ultimately how that AI makes its decisions? I can imagine a scenario where its chinese tech and Israel is left explaining why they fired at this or kill this person etc.
I think your theory is plausible
I also think early on some may have been extreme on purpose: ignore public opinion and show that world that if you **** with us we will go all in. Dumb for pr, but might make others think twice before attacking
The tunnels were real but most seem to be in Rafah which of course makes sense
Israel has a 7 front war and an existential battles in front of it (Gaza just being a small salvo in that existential war). You don't need to overthink why a nation has to risk it all to survive. Occam's razor applies perfectly here. And that will be more apparent when they take the fight to their northern border in short order. Anything happening with AI is also a matter of making up for the legit short fall in soldiers they have, something also easily apparent given the massive push to get the Haredim to serve (in at least a support capacity).
And btw any hostage talk in the media is a total waste of time to follow and has been almost from the start. I totally ignore it.
The Americans are learning over and over that frequently in the middle east it's negotiation (with your enemies) via deception, half-truths, probing for weakness, etc. This is deeply cultural, the Israelis are entirely used to it now (and play the game too). The Americans bring a very simplified view of the world to these negotiations and always seem surprised when it's not so simple. That's the main reason why Israel would never front-load statehood. There's no precedent EVER down there to trust that. Trust is typically well earned down there over time and bears the most fruit that way.
I think the leverage just shifted back to Israel. So I'm not suprised that suddenly all this deal chatter is renewed.
https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-80...
I agree rafiki
Israel controlling Philadelphi now is the key to keeping hamas out of power. It also puts Egypt in a position where they need to act shocked about the 82 tunnels found there and to condemn them...
Israel should have gone to rafah from the start
Regardless of what Biden is claiming, the above is reality
I think your theory is plausible
I also think early on some may have been extreme on purpose: ignore public opinion and show that world that if you **** with us we will go all in. Dumb for pr, but might make others think twice before attacking
The tunnels were real but most seem to be in Rafah which of course makes sense
I understand this sentiment I think. And I think its likely as well.
I meant to point at the strike timing though. There seems to be a motivator thats being hidden in the media.
Part of my reasoning is that I think AI is essential for militaries now and that by nature of it you CAN'T outsource it. You HAVE to have local, the backend, the servers, storage, data centers etc..
So it seems to me that there is critical stuff underground to protect, and it seems to me that israel felt that it was in critical danger. Its just a possibility. I have more theories that involved our hidden history being stored underground as well, I hardly doubt that controversial.
Israel has a 7 front war and an existential battles in front of it (Gaza just being a small salvo in that existential war). You don't need to overthink why a nation has to risk it all to survive. Occam's razor applies perfectly here. And that will be more apparent when they take the fight to their northern border in short order. Anything happening with AI is also a matter of making up for the legit short fall in soldiers they have, something also easily apparent given the massive push to get the
Ok but in the 5 or 7 or so threads, most of which are controlled by the pandas, can't you see the quandary building? Israel is going to run out of allied support at the exact same time that Ukraine does. This is obvious. At the same time Americans decide they want their constitutional based values and freedoms back.
Yup, its existential that's for sure. How can none of you see this play?
Israel is besieged.
What are these pandas you keep mentioning
Ok but in the 5 or 7 or so threads, most of which are controlled by the pandas, can't you see the quandary building? Israel is going to run out of allied support at the exact same time that Ukraine does. This is obvious. At the same time Americans decide they want their constitutional based values and freedoms back.
Yup, its existential that's for sure. How can none of you see this play?
Israel is besieged.
What do you mean, that if Trump wins Israel loses American help? I think you are really wrong if that's the claim.
(panoramic datanaters)
https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showp...
What do you mean, that if Trump wins Israel loses American help? I think you are really wrong if that's the claim.
Well you see the pandas have the related economic dialogues framed and narrated as well. The growing debt and cost to pay is a byproduct force of the war. Or like everyone tries to say inflation fuels war. But it also drives our psychology. I think you might see a renewed patriotic passion for the American constitutional framework yes. You can see the forces at play.
Ok but in the 5 or 7 or so threads, most of which are controlled by the pandas, can't you see the quandary building? Israel is going to run out of allied support at the exact same time that Ukraine does. This is obvious. At the same time Americans decide they want their constitutional based values and freedoms back.
Yup, its existential that's for sure. How can none of you see this play?
Israel is besieged.
For this you'll have to show your work. Because there's now, there's AFTER the American election, and then there's depending on the situation.
In an IDF vs Gazan war? No allied support (and actually that's not true because of how much support happens behind the scenes). But if we starting listing other possible conflicts, we get very different outcomes on "allied support". So that's why I suggest you show your work. Because you're going to be very surprised at how much support Israel would actually get in various conflict permutations (and more so post November election).
The degree on allied support on that attack from Iran was unprecedented. And that's AFTER 5 figure civilian death in Gaza.
https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-80...
Israel should have gone to rafah from the start
That one will be taught in military schools for generations. No idea what they were doing. Just too much pressure and rage and they weren't thinking clearly. Supply lines, you cut them.
Maybe their models showed too great a risk, but I dunno. The juice was worth the squeeze in my very simplified view of the campaign. And then civilians are slowly pushed north instead. I guess part of the issue is most of the Hamas battalions were in the north, so they went north. But uncovering the tunnels and such from the word go would have been the better optics for Israel I think.
For this you'll have to show your work. Because there's now, there's AFTER the American election, and then there's depending on the situation.
In an IDF vs Gazan war? No allied support (and actually that's not true because of how much support happens behind the scenes). But if we starting listing other possible conflicts, we get very different outcomes on "allied support". So that's why I suggest you show your work. Because you're going to be very surprised at how much support Israel would actua
A big part of the deals that joe is trying to make is saudi
Saudi is one of the good guys now.
That one will be taught in military schools for generations. No idea what they were doing. Just too much pressure and rage and they weren't thinking clearly. Supply lines, you cut them.
Maybe their models showed too great a risk, but I dunno. The juice was worth the squeeze in my very simplified view of the campaign. And then civilians are slowly pushed north instead. I guess part of the issue is most of the Hamas battalions were in the north, so they went north. But uncovering the tunnels and s
Well
Egypt was against them going to rafah
Rafah is far away from Israel
If they went to rafah first they would be pushing refugees towards Israel, and I'm sure they were hoping egypt would willingly take refugees the way they did it
So i get why they did it how they did
I just think it wasn't smart
I understand this sentiment I think. And I think its likely as well.
I meant to point at the strike timing though. There seems to be a motivator thats being hidden in the media.
Part of my reasoning is that I think AI is essential for militaries now and that by nature of it you CAN'T outsource it. You HAVE to have local, the backend, the servers, storage, data centers etc..
So it seems to me that there is critical stuff underground to protect, and it seems to me that israel felt that it was i
What strike timing? You do realize that the Palestinians are the ones that invaded Israel with 6,000 men, killed around 1k Israeli's, and took 250 hostages (a lot of them already dead), right?
If you want to believe the Israeli govt has ulterior motives in the ongoing Gaza invasion that is fine; but as with your Russia speculation you do this weird thing where you dont seem to acknowledge who actually invaded who. And how there would be no war at all if it wasn't for these invasions.
And btw any hostage talk in the media is a total waste of time to follow and has been almost from the start. I totally ignore it.
The Americans are learning over and over that frequently in the middle east it's negotiation (with your enemies) via deception, half-truths, probing for weakness, etc. This is deeply cultural, the Israelis are entirely used to it now (and play the game too). The Americans bring a very simplified view of the world to these negotiations and always seem surprised when it'
Well, I think the American public (including all the dumb dumb protestors) has a simplified view, as does the Arab public. I think the people in charge (not Biden who is senile) dont have this view, but they are playing to a mass audience, so that is how things are distilled.
For those inclined to support Israel (which I think is a perfectly reasonable position) I think you have to accept the US, although nominally supporting Israel, does have valid geopolitical reasons to appease Arab concerns and are playing both sides.
I don't think the us is really trying to appease "arab concerns" that's too general
Right now they are definitely calculating how saudi reacts. And yes they care about jordan and egypt to a degree
I think the US is concerned how support for Israel affects their relationship with some European countries