Biggest loser in online poker history wants to grind $16k
I start this with some pictures:
nl2 -$8792.18 -82 buy ins below EV
nl5 (notice that pt4 shows party poker nl5 as nl4) -$5943.81
nl10 -$773.92 -15 buy ins below EV
Total loss -$15509.91
This is me playing nl2, nl5 and nl10 on party poker for one year.
My history begins somewhere in same period when they started to show WSOP shows in television. I think I have played 12-13 years nows mainly NL2, some amount of NL5 and little bit of NL10 what is the biggest stake i've ever played.
I've read all Sklansky, all Harrington, all Miller, watched huge amount of videos, bought trackers and calculators.
Still after those years and after that all I've lost huge amount of money on those stakes. I try to play my best but losing to huge suckouts like 95/5 favorite makes me really upset.
I've lost literally all my money including all my life savings to online poker. I want to try one last time to win those money back and little bit of extra. That's why $16k. What I need is support and guiding.
I had thread on micro forum but they deleted it just when people start to understand that this is real situation and not fake.
And if you wonder where that biggest loser comes from it was said by guy who has been playing for living many years. He said I'm the biggest loser in history counted as lost buy ins.
And today.
Pre-Flop: ($0.15) Hero (Paisting) is SB with A♣ K♥
3 players fold, braywa777 (BU) calls $0.10, Paisting (SB) raises to $10.30 (all-in), 1 fold, braywa777 (BU) calls $10.20
Why do you keep over betting or open shoving like this?
Explain your thought process, backed up with evidence, that this style is consistently profitable even though it goes against the generally accepted strategy for holdem.
Why do you keep over betting or open shoving like this?
Explain your thought process, backed up with evidence, that this style is consistently profitable even though it goes against the generally accepted strategy for holdem.
That braywa777 is total whale, making ridiculous calls like that after limp and is limping 100% on button. He is ready to call any raise, but then slows down on many scary boards. When we know we are light years ahead his range and he is ready to play pre flop for stacks but folds on flop or turn smaller pots, I think it’s really easy to push him all in. And of course I push there aces too to balance.
There are lots of that kind of whales with limp call all ins with dominated hand.
That braywa777 is total whale, making ridiculous calls like that after limp and is limping 100% on button. He is ready to call any raise, but then slows down on many scary boards. When we know we are light years ahead his range and he is ready to play pre flop for stacks but folds on flop or turn smaller pots, I think it’s really easy to push him all in. And of course I push there aces too to balance.
There are lots of that kind of whales with limp call all ins with dominated hand.
Paisting if you jam any 2 cards preflop including aces do you consider that to be balanced?
Don't you just start going all-in every hand for long stretches with any 2 cards after you get tilted and take a bad beat? Or am I incorrect in saying that's your tendency? Or do you not do that anymore?
I post every month about 20 hand where I lose with 70-95% equity to show people that is not normal working poker site. Go through to hands and look how much there is shoving and with any 2. Those your any 2 has 80-90% equity against those whales. 888 just don't let me run over them like it should be and those idiots should lose money in 15 minutes.
I post every month about 20 hand where I lose with 70-95% equity to show people that is not normal working poker site. Go through to hands and look how much there is shoving and with any 2. Those your any 2 has 80-90% equity against those whales. 888 just don't let me run over them like it should be and those idiots should lose money in 15 minutes.
You didn't answer my question.
Do you start going all-in every hand in a row after a bad beat? Or have you stopped doing that? Have you ever even acknowledged that's what you do? Are you even aware that's what you do? We have the evidence Paisting, you keep cherry picking hands but we can see your graph just starts going straight down at points where you are literally going all-in every hand so please answer my question, don't ignore it. Thanks.
I post every month about 20 hand where I lose with 70-95% equity to show people that is not normal working poker site. Go through to hands and look how much there is shoving and with any 2. Those your any 2 has 80-90% equity against those whales. 888 just don't let me run over them like it should be and those idiots should lose money in 15 minutes.
I see two big stretches last month where you lost almost 150BIs in less than 1500 hands. In fact the vast majority of the EV difference comes from these two stretches as well.
You didn't answer my question.
Do you start going all-in every hand in a row after a bad beat? Or have you stopped doing that? Have you ever even acknowledged that's what you do? Are you even aware that's what you do? We have the evidence Paisting, you keep cherry picking hands but we can see your graph just starts going straight down at points where you are literally going all-in every hand so please answer my question, don't ignore it. Thanks.
Judging by the recent graphs, it happens at least once a month. He won't answer the question as asked directly though.
I post every month about 20 hand where I lose with 70-95% equity to show people that is not normal working poker site. Go through to hands and look how much there is shoving and with any 2. Those your any 2 has 80-90% equity against those whales. 888 just don't let me run over them like it should be and those idiots should lose money in 15 minutes.
20 hands.
You play 1000s of hands each month.
Nobody is arguing the hands you post (for the most part). We are interested about the other hands you don't post where you likely go crazy and start going allin with any 2 cards. There is a reason people are willing to call your overbets and shoves with a wide range. It's because of how you play after you get bad beat and go on tilt.
You're not losing 2K a month by getting bad beat.
OP, would you accept a deal of $100,000 paid over 10 years under the condition that you have to quit poker forever?
Paisting, what mato is trying to say is that if you quit playing poker you would stop losing that much money. Just quit playing poker and find something else to do with your life, you'll be happier for it. And you'll have more money too.
hey I haven't read the thread all the way through but Paisting did you ever make your 16k back?
You are a sad human that needs help man.
Can we get a lifetime graph
That's a bit harsh he has a gambling addiction clearly no different than people playing slots all day. A slot player could at least win a big jackpot I guess but its still similar.
Obviously he understands he sucks, just look at the thread title. It's a weird schtick but apparently he's good with it.
Paisting do you ever feel bad about losing 50k+ euros of hard working taxpayers money at 2nl?
Imagine being that stupid to think that saying losing to 300$ to suckout explains why you are six figures down at the smallest games possible you idiot :p
Paisting do you ever feel bad about losing 50k+ euros of hard working taxpayers money at 2nl?
Have you looked those hands where I lose and with what hands I lose? When you look that, then tell me what are the hands to start with and what are the hands to go from the flop that makes money. Asked this many times zero answers.
It's been answered a million times you just ignore the answers because they don't fit your narrative,
