Fringe conspiracy containment thread
Here is my conspiracy theory which I, with zero evidentiary support, think is being planned right now and will be carried out in 2025. I think that Trump et. al is, right now, crafting a conspiracy theory about the assassination attempt. This conspiracy theory will be bananas, like outlandish and easily disproven at any level of analysis, just like the stolen 2020 election cons
Yea I agree this may happen
To save the don from a made up threat; the Russians told the patsy he is the only person who can stop the threat for whatever reason.
Cutting it a bit fine with the whole ear thing, no? I mean, what if he accidentally pops him? Oh, the ear was explosives, so he was just shooting some random in the crowd. Ok, I think I'm following along now, sort of.
I don’t think that’s what happened but I am trying to make a theory where his ear gets ****ed up and it’s not from a bullet.
Cutting it a bit fine with the whole ear thing, no? I mean, what if he accidentally pops him? Oh, the ear was explosives, so he was just shooting some random in the crowd. Ok, I think I'm following along now, sort of.
I don't think he meant that it was staged, but that Trump and associates will say it was a conspiracy of his enemies.
I don't think he meant that it was staged, but that Trump and associates will say it was a conspiracy of his enemies.
DM said that, yes.
PW was saying it was staged.
I don't think he meant that it was staged, but that Trump and associates will say it was a conspiracy of his enemies.
when really it was staged by a conspiracy of people who want him to win.
I would have been more likely to believe that if he hadn't already had great momentum.
I don’t think that’s what happened but I am trying to make a theory where his ear gets ****ed up and it’s not from a bullet.
Why would his ear need to get ****ed up?
Good point
We've been over this. It's so PlayBig would not be able to tell that they replaced him with an imposter.
It's a good point. He's basically shooting for hummingbirds in flight and it doesn't make sense.
f/1.6 for a shallow depth of field. 1/8000s could be the proper exposure for such a wide open lens with that background - it's pretty effin bright.
This is fishy imo
How often are bullets taken picture of?
Also, I read this is the same photographer that took the pic of bush being notified about 9/11 in the kids classroom
You think there was only one photographer present when Bush was visiting the grade school on 9/11?
This is fishy imo
How often are bullets taken picture of?
Also, I read this is the same photographer that took the pic of bush being notified about 9/11 in the kids classroom
I know nothing about photography; what is supposed to be controversial about this photo?
have not heard from pb2k since the shooting, was he by any chance a pennsylvania firefighter or a 19 year old kid?
He's been posting, but looks like thoughts on how best toplay AK, AJ and KJ are more important than coming to give us the inside scoop on who really shot Orange. Maybe he is still in shock that TopBrass and BJ-DJ didn't give him advance warning of the plan.
trump's all about the wwf showbiz thing. A complete near miss(no real bullets anyway) doesn't sell it quite like a little of the red stuff. Fireman etc obv fake. Despite his tough guy persona we know it's eating him up that it was close and probably hoped it would give him a boost. Do not f up the fistpump scene or you're fired and I'm serious. Put the short girl right in front/bending over so it's a good picture. And boom--biden goes down instead.
It could probably use some fleshing out. But there's plenty of conspiracy material to work with 😀
I know nothing about photography; what is supposed to be controversial about this photo?
The story is something like the minimum shutter speed to possibly capture a bullet trace or whatever is 1/8000. Most high-end/professional DSLR cameras have a max shutter speed of 1/8000. So the conspiracy people say why are you shooting a speech at that high of shutter speed unless you're trying to capture some sharp frames of someone's head exploding from a bullet.
The story is something like the minimum shutter speed to possibly capture a bullet trace or whatever is 1/8000. Most high-end/professional DSLR cameras have a max shutter speed of 1/8000. So the conspiracy people say why are you shooting a speech at that high of shutter speed unless you're trying to capture some sharp frames of someone's head exploding from a bullet.
I have an 8 year old Sony rx10 iv and it will shoot at 1/32000. I think my previous camera might have topped out at 1/6400 but I imagine most cameras these days are capable of shooting at faster shutter speeds than 1/8000.
