IQ (moved subtopic)

IQ (moved subtopic)

by d2_e4 k

^^Hey Luciom, can you remind me again how smart JD Vance is? Above, same, or below the average MAGA chode?

I have no problem with schools using affirmative action to help people like Vance with humble backgrounds.... but maybe not in law school where these idiots start becoming dangerous. And they got to find smarter people then Vance or the whole thing just looks ridiculous and all you're doing is de-valuing your own department.

06 September 2024 at 01:49 PM
Reply...

1269 Replies

5
w


Yes, that patches the proof. Both chez and I already did it for you. No, you can't leave that step as implied and claim you proved "if x then y". You proved "if y then x". With the additional step you have now proved "if and only if y then x", from which "if x then y" follows.


it would cost a point or two on an exam.

Then again we assume exam markers require all the steps. and grammer spilling


More than one I'd hope. If I reasoned "The road becomes wet when it rains. The road is wet, therefore it has been raining", I'd expect to fail that question/section if the exam is anything related to logic or proofs. I would need to show that the road becomes wet only when it rains, saying "well, how else would it become wet, thought that bit was obvious" is not really going to cut it.

Edit: I wrote that response before you edited your post, when it said "that would cost a point".


We make the effort to spell properly when chaps like you have some power and we give a toss about the mark.

edit: that wa styalistic. Number of point is fairly meaingless without a scale.


by chezlaw k

We make the effort to spell properly when chaps like you have some power and we give a toss about the mark.

I see. Do you also only go for a shower when you have a date?

Anyway, my criticism of your master's proof has nothing to do with spelling, as you know. He failed on the logic section. The IQ section, if you like.


I have worn a tie. Not sure I have this century.


by chezlaw k

I have worn a tie. Not sure I have this century.

Shame, we could have used it to string you up and save ourselves the pain and anguish of having to decipher your illegible posts.


and save me all mine. Oh well

.


by d2_e4 k

Trying to get noticed by Emperor Sklansky and get in the IQ standings, obviously.

So, let's put this to rest for good. Here is the almost complete combined standings of the smartest regular posters on 2+2, Unstuck, and Slow Pony are. A few names undoubtedly slipped my mind so if you are not on it there is a small chance it was an oversight. Apologies for misspellings.

I will have nothing further to say on the subject,

1 Bobman

2. Chris V

3. eccriture d'adulte

4. Crossnerd

5. Grizy

6. Risky Flush

7. ukemaster

8. Angry Queer

9. Checkraisedraw

10. Simplicitus

11. Microbet

12. Rickroll

13. Roccoco

14. (Tie) Notbrucez

14. (Tie) Clovis

16. chezlaw

17. Melkerson

18.. Bored Social

19.. LFS

20. d2 e4

21. Ganstaman

22. Jalfrezi

23. Luciom

24. Caffeine Needed

25. PVN

26. Riverman

27. Dunyain

28. Bubble Balls

29. Slighted

30. Tame Deuces

31. Mr. Wookie

32. Commonwealth

33. Jman

34. Suzzer


First

Well, not first obvs. First to respond!



by David Sklansky k

So let's put this to rest for good. Here is the almost complete combined standings as to how smart the regular posters on 2+2, Unstuck, and Slow Pony are. A few names undoubtedly slipped my mind so if you are not on it there is a small chance it was an oversight. apologies for misspellings.

I will have nothing further to say on the subject,

1 Bobman

2. Chris V

3. eccriture d'adulte

4. Crossnerd

5. Grizy

6. Risky Flush

7. ukemaster

8. Angry Queer

9. Checkraisedraw

10. Simplicitus

11. Microbet

12. Rickroll

13.

I think this belongs ITT, otherwise the election thread is gonna get OT.


I re-posted god's great list in the IQ thread, so that this thread doesn't get too derailed.


Dave, you missed someone. Or are you the undisputed zeroth position?

Well, a couple of people actually. Playbig must be tied for 0 with you.

Lol @putting chez where you put him. Puts something of a question mark over the integrity of the rating process.


i've been dethroned


Hey, you are still a spot above Roc. You all just got bumped to make room for the real brainboxes like *checks notes* chezlaw.


Wait, the forum that spun off from here had it's own spin off?


by d2_e4 k

Dave, you missed someone. Or are you the undisputed zeroth position?

Well, a couple of people actually. Playbig must be tied for 0 with you.

Lol @putting chez where you put him. Puts something of a question mark over the integrity of the rating process.

You made the list. Don't be so bitter


by chezlaw k

You made the list. Don't be so bitter

Top 20 (just), byatches. Small town kid makes good.


Just think how well we could both do if we posted less


by chezlaw k

Just think how well we could both do if we posted less

Doubt you could do much to change your spot, since he obviously confused you with someone else.


I am someone else


There was a brief competition years ago between two posters who challenged each other to who could go the longest without posting. If I recall correctly, it involved outing some secondary accounts, new accounts, begging and a short time frame.


Why should anyone care and why is this in the election thread?

by David Sklansky k

So, let's put this to rest for good. Here is the almost complete combined standings of the smartest regular posters on 2+2, Unstuck, and Slow Pony are. A few names undoubtedly slipped my mind so if you are not on it there is a small chance it was an oversight. Apologies for misspellings.

I will have nothing further to say on the subject,

1 Bobman

2. Chris V

3. eccriture d'adulte

4. Crossnerd

5. Grizy

6. Risky Flush

7. ukemaster

8. Angry Queer

9. Checkraisedraw

10. Simplicitus

11. Microbet

12. Rickroll

13. Roc


by holmfries k

Why should anyone care and why is this in the election thread?

Because only the top 10 are allowed to vote.


No nich p makes the list kinda invalid

Reply...