Capitol attack and 6th of January hearings
VP was rushed off the floor by Secret service.
Senate is on lockdown.
Terrorists have breached barricades and appear to be
lol, you really can’t be this dumb. What you attached the first time is not a transcript(s). What you attached the second time has links to the transcripts but is still not a transcript.
I guess I'll just put you back on ignore where you belong. Then you can lie as much as you like and I won't have to respond to your garbage.
Sure. You are only here for the negative attention anyways.
I am sure it’s too hard to understand the difference between a quote and a transcript but you do you.
I think its funny Dems blame Trump for Jan 6th when there were no words said directly telling people to go raid the Capitol, yet when the BLM riots happened and businesses were destroyed/people died Dems were quoted telling people to attack. The BLM riots were much worse than Jan 6th - 2000 cops were injured yet Jan 6th "attack" is terrible! So stupid
I think its funny Dems blame Trump for Jan 6th when there were no words said directly telling people to go raid the Capitol, yet when the BLM riots happened and businesses were destroyed/people died Dems were quoted telling people to attack. The BLM riots were much worse than Jan 6th - 2000 cops were injured yet Jan 6th "attack" is terrible! So stupid
What's even more horrible is the J6'ers are being treated like political prisoners, receiving the harshest prison sentences just for walking into the capitol building peacefully while the doors were opened up for them. There's plenty of video of police officers waiving people in.
President Trump vowed to free these political prisoners once he's officially reinstated.
You guys do know nobody buys that **** right?
The old conservative tactic of lying and gaslighting, getting owned, running away, then coming back and doing it again as if nothing happened isn't effective or novel. It's stupid and old.
says a guy with 16k posts. Imagine wasting that much time posting on here arguing over the internet lol.
Amazingly enough, the number of posts I have doesn't affect the quality of yours. But it does give me some standing to say that yours was one of the dumbest takes I've seen around here.
Standing ?...... bwahahahahahaha
What's even more horrible is the J6'ers are being treated like political prisoners, receiving the harshest prison sentences just for walking into the capitol building peacefully while the doors were opened up for them. There's plenty of video of police officers waiving people in.
Update:
By the end of 2021, 725 people had been charged with federal crimes. That number rose to 1,000 by the second anniversary of the attack, and to 1,200 by the third anniversary, at which point over 890 people had been found guilty of federal crimes.
So much for the "tour" version of events.
I think its funny Dems blame Trump for Jan 6th when there were no words said directly telling people to go raid the Capitol, yet when the BLM riots happened and businesses were destroyed/people died Dems were quoted telling people to attack. The BLM riots were much worse than Jan 6th - 2000 cops were injured yet Jan 6th "attack" is terrible! So stupid
Yup , fight like hell (just to name one at the end of his speech ) means it’s a very benign thing .
That is why hell is such a beautiful place to aim at in the Catholic spiritual journey .
I know math for many is not an easy subject but 10000 manifestations is far from being comparable to 1 ……
I cant imagine the damages of 10000 6th January would of bring to this country shrug
I mean we are sure at least 1 person died during January 6 right ?
So that’s 10000 death if u want compare with blm ?
ps: and who knows, that january 6th, if it was replicated 10k times, maybe the one we saw was the most benign ?
i doubt the police would invite people "peacefully" to crash the building 10k times....at one point they would probably changed their tactics ?
Just gonna drop this here, AGAIN.
[quote="Colorado Supreme Court decision that has NOT been challenged or overturned"]
We conclude that the foregoing evidence, the great bulk of which was undisputed at trial, established that President Trump engaged in insurrection. President Trump’s direct and express efforts, over several months, exhorting his supporters to march to the Capitol to prevent what he falsely characterized as an alleged fraud on the people of this country were indisputably overt and voluntary. Moreover, the evidence amply showed that President Trump undertook all these actions to aid and further a common unlawful purpose that he himself conceived and set in motion: prevent Congress from certifying the 2020 presidential election and stop the peaceful transfer of power.
...
As our detailed recitation of the evidence shows, President Trump did not merely incite the insurrection. Even when the siege on the Capitol was fully underway, he continued to support it by repeatedly demanding that Vice President Pence refuse to perform his constitutional duty and by calling Senators to persuade them to stop the counting of electoral votes. These actions constituted overt, voluntary, and direct participation in the insurrection. ¶224 Moreover, the record amply demonstrates that President Trump fully intended to—and did—aid or further the insurrectionists’ common unlawful purpose of preventing the peaceful transfer of power in this country. He exhorted them to fight to prevent the certification of the 2020 presidential election. He personally took action to try to stop the certification. And for many hours, he and his supporters succeeded in halting that process.
For these reasons, we conclude that the record fully supports the district court’s finding that President Trump engaged in insurrection within the meaning of Section Three.
[/quote]
Reminder that the SCOTUS did not change this decision, they only ruled that this decision is not enough to remove him from a state's ballot.
Amazingly enough, the number of posts I have doesn't affect the quality of yours. But it does give me some standing to say that yours was one of the dumbest takes I've seen around here.
Just because you spend your whole life on here doesn't mean your opinion is any more valid than anyone else's. I know plenty of people who play golf for 30+ years and still suck - this might be where you fall.
Just because you spend your whole life on here doesn't mean your opinion is any more valid than anyone else's. I know plenty of people who play golf for 30+ years and still suck - this might be where you fall.
There are much easier to spot reasons that his opinion is more valid than many other's.
Yup , fight like hell (just to name one at the end of his speech ) means it’s a very benign thing .
That is why hell is such a beautiful place to aim at in the Catholic spiritual journey .
I know math for many is not an easy subject but 10000 manifestations is far from being comparable to 1 ……
I cant imagine the damages of 10000 6th January would of bring to this country shrug
I mean we are sure at least 1 person died during January 6 right ?
So that’s 10000 death if u want compare with blm ?
ps:
You seem to forget what all the Dems said regarding BLM riots - you seem to forget the lives that were lost, the thousands injured, the small businesses destroyed/looted - it was pure carnage. But the focus for you is on the Jan 6 "attack" which pales in comparison. Either way arguing especially in this forum is just a big waste of time - we're just going in a circle with no result so not wasting more time replying to nonsense.
Could you show us what "all the Dems said?" With sources.
She said, regarding all of the horrible riots which included the burning down of buildings and churches, "They're not gonna stop. Theyre never gonna stop."
Broken YouTube LinkShe then said she's never gonna stop supporting them and even helped bail them out of jail.
Imagine if Trump bailed out someone who casually walked into the Capitol building but she bails people out left and right who were doing actual rioting.
We were talking about rioting and violence. She is talking about protestors. You understand the difference, right?
She also did not help bail anyone out of jail. Utter failure of a post.
You should probably also be aware that opinion pieces are not sources. Just for the future, champ.
You seem to forget what all the Dems said regarding BLM riots - you seem to forget the lives that were lost, the thousands injured, the small businesses destroyed/looted - it was pure carnage. But the focus for you is on the Jan 6 "attack" which pales in comparison. Either way arguing especially in this forum is just a big waste of time - we're just going in a circle with no result so not wasting more time replying to nonsense.
She said, regarding all of the horrible riots which included the burning down of buildings and churches, "They're not gonna stop. Theyre never gonna stop."
She then said she's never gonna stop supporting them and even helped bail them out of jail.
Imagine if Trump bailed out someone who casually walked into the Capitol building but she bails people out left and right who were doing actual rioting.
What you are neglecting to point out or maybe you are just unaware of is that 95% of BLM rallies did not end up as riots. They were peaceful with no arrests.
What Kamala referred to in the interview you just posted was not a support of riots but a support of protests that were about the police killing black people for no reason. At no point did she use the word "riot".
The other thing you may or may not be aware of is that BLM riots were not always caused by the protestors themselves. It was speculated that some of the riots and fires were caused by ultra right wing white supremacist groups hoping to cast a negative pall around the BLM protests.
When I looked it up online it said that in all of the BLM protests only 34 police officers were physically harmed. At the Jan 6th protest/riot 140 police officers were physically harmed. It may be that some police officers waved people into the capitol. It may also be that they were right wing Trump supporters. However, that does not account for the vicious attacks on police officers that were not letting people into the capitol.
edit: I just looked at 2 politi-fact articles that dispute claims about officers being hurt by BLM protestors but one article does indicate that the US Dpt of justice said 700 police officers were injured (and the article claims that it cannot verify that it actually happened).
What I had previously read was that there had been only 34 charges files against people for injuring police officers and 1 charge for injuring some type of guard.
We were talking about rioting and violence. She is talking about protestors. You understand the difference, right?
She also did not help bail anyone out of jail. Utter failure of a post.
You should probably also be aware that opinion pieces are not sources. Just for the future, champ.
So are you saying they arrested the peaceful protesters? Why would someone get arrested for protesting peacefully?
Nothing to see here. Just "mostly peaceful" protests.
There are social media posts of hers in the links I provide to prove she helped bail out arrestees (for rioting, not for protesting peacefully. People don't go to jail for that).
Why are you asking me what I said. You can just re-read my post to see what I said. If you don't find the text you are asking about, then no, I didn't say it.
And no, there are no social media posts in your links that prove that. Stop lying.
Why are you asking me what I said. You can just re-read my post to see what I said. If you don't find the text you are asking about, then no, I didn't say it.
And no, there are no social media posts in your links that prove that. Stop lying.
Stop spreading false information. Here's her social media post
Stop spreading false information. Here's her social media post
Which does not show her helping bail out any rioters. In fact, it EXPLICITLY says protestors. It doesn't even say she contributed to the fund. Can you stop lying for 2 seconds (or is your grasp of the language and/or issues really this poor)?
You seem to forget what all the Dems said regarding BLM riots - you seem to forget the lives that were lost, the thousands injured, the small businesses destroyed/looted - it was pure carnage. But the focus for you is on the Jan 6 "attack" which pales in comparison. Either way arguing especially in this forum is just a big waste of time - we're just going in a circle with no result so not wasting more time replying to nonsense.
What you seem to forget is that in the mist of the event when Trump could have addressed the nation and his word could have ended the violence, he instead acted in his own personal best interest, did nothing. Nada. Zip. No other president has exhibited such a lack of leadership abilities and harmed our nation. He is a truly worthless human being.
