4 hands same table

Nobody wants to read such long posts.

Post each hand separately. Post the four in a series, one after the other. Give only relevant V for each hand. Refer to the earlier hands. I’m looking forward to reading them.

I mean to be honest that other thread just makes me assume its all epic hero calls.

Hand 1: I think flop is a flat. Fold now.

Hand 2: It’s gross but you just gotta call. (Also, I assume villain is OTB, not in BB?)

Hand 3: I’m inclined to mostly check flop. I’d mostly bet river.

Kinda off-topic, but I’d keep an eye out for collusion when a reg is bringing friends who are playing nonsensically and then they’re both doing cold entry in 3bp shenanigans. Doesn’t seem to apply based on turn play, but just throwing that out there.

Hand 4: 3b bigger pre. Extremely disinclined to lead flop, esp this big. Can’t really go wrong OTT though imo

I was keeping an eye out for it but if it was a collusion attempt it was pretty poor since one of them lost about as much money as the other players at the table bought in for, maybe more I wasn’t keeping a running count.

i assume it's larp given he couldn't pay 80$ for pre ranges and like let's be real. no one playing high stakes is going to post hands here

is whatever but will echo what the other guy said. you're going to have better luck with responses if you post the hands in multiple threads

I never even considered this possibility, but that would be wild. PugDolk is now the forum’s premier Nick Vertucci simp. I cant decide if this is evidence for or against your theory.

I’m not paying 80 cents to solve a hand for somebody else ever lol. And without the solver in that hand I called correctly that it was bluff and suggested 99 as the combo (it was 88) so you can say only the solver ever matters but it doesn’t. If I wanted to just run piosolver I’d just run piosolver but I don’t I post on here, I post on other forums, I talk to a coach, I talk to other players that I run in the same circles as. Lots of people who played high stakes used to post on here.

youre so interested in improvement that you post hh's to a nearly dead forum predominately made up of weaker players at 1/50 of your stakes, but you're unwilling to spend less than a bb when multiple people tell you that you have glaring misconceptions that are easily proven?

This might blow your mind but I don’t really care what the solver says.

You can't use a solver in a game like this - so many people misuse solvers to the point where they're hindering their performance. On to the hands

H1 - I would just call the flop - raising to 4k really serves no purpose other than allowing the villains behind to play perfect. You're repping QQ+ and yet he jams over you - can't imagine calling here

H2 - Think I'm calling here.

H3 - not sure why you check the turn. Would keep barreling with great equity - put max pressure on Jx.

H4 - Think I'd jam the turn - your line looks super strong jamming 3 ways to rep the overpair. I do like the flop lead as well -

but you care what the live no limit forum thinks?

IMO you should do these in separate threads. Too daunting to reply to each hand.

Hand 1 I think just fold. I think a fair amount of their range has you crushed and a lot of it is going to be flipping or at a slight advantage with stuff like combo draws, 2 overs and FD, etc. And facing not one but 2 players. I don't know that I like raising here either. What do we hope to accomplish? The high equity draws and hands that have us crushed are likely just going to ship it. The hands that have ok equity vs us but not high equity overall for the board like KsQs are not going to call if we just call the shove from v1.

Hand 2 is sick because it's hard to know if v is the type of rec who is never 4betting with bluffs or with a hand like AKo. I would love to know that he had 4bet light before. With the little we have to go on in OP, I think we just sigh call and hope he can have AK. Even if he had no bluffs if he can have AK then we have a profitable call. I don't think folding is impossible, but we need to know he doesn't 4bet AKo.

Hand 3 I don't like going so big multiway on the flop. You have to get it through every player. I would go 1/4 pot or check. You can easily check call this hand. Turn I think check is fine as we have equity to check call. How wide does he cold call a 3b? I think he might have some busted straight draw / fd type hands we may have some showdown against. The question is, if you check, will he let you win by checking back a hand like KQ? Having hearts we unblock AJs, JTs and some busted flush draws. I think it is close between going 12k into 8k to get Jx to fold, going 5.5k to get TT, T9, T8 type hands to fold (and his busted draw hands thst we beat but might bluff us off), and giving up and hoping we get a chance to win at showdown. I kind of lean towards taking our showdown. I am a little worried we might get heroed by Jx f we go 12k and might get heroes by worse than Jx if we go smaller. But it is a tragedy if somehow we lose to AQo, AKo. I think you need to lean heavily on past showdowns from villain to figure out what the best course is here.

Hand 4 preflop size looks way to small. I would go 2k. 4x without the cold caller, 5x with the cold caller. Again I don't like the big flop size multiway. You have to get it through 2 players. Also, you want to go a size where they will raise off their strong hands. When you go large, they are more likely to slow play a hand like 87s. I think check call or shipping it are both viable. Occasionally you will be drawing dead when you ship it though, but I think you get a fair amount of folds from TT, 99, 88, 65s, and straight draws. Some equity vs the narrow range that calls the jam. A lot of the hands that are going to fold to jam in btn's range are going to check on the turn too and you will get to realize your equity vs them. So I imagine it's close.

Yes because I’m never playing on a table full of solvers because I don’t play online. I’m playing on tables full of players who are at best still worse than the average live no limit poster. So it actually ends up amounting to better output.

Then we have to call river I think.

As other posters have already said: please try to post 1 hand per thread, it makes each thread so much easier to read.
Also, please include pot size on each strett, again for the sake of readability.

Disclaimer #1: I do not play this high ...

Disclaimer #2: I never play with btn straddle, so I'll skip H1 and H3.

H2
I probably fold pre to the 4bet from BB, although its size is obviously too small.
As played, it seems like a fairly standard call otr.

H4
Your 3bet size seems way too small; standard would be ~2000 , I guess
OTF, the pot is 4500, right? If you cbet AQ here, it means that you are c-betting range, or close to, therefore you want to bet smaller, like 1/4 to 1/3 pot. Otherwise, just check/evaluate with your hand.
As played, turn is a weird spot. Perhaps just ship it? Not really sure though

Edit: I guess the 4bet was from the btn, not the bb, correct?
If so, then the size looks more reasonable, although still on the smaller side, and I'm even more inclined to fold pre.

This may be the nicest thing anyone's ever said here.

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

So true. Thanks pug dolk!

Results:

Hand 2: