2024 ELECTION THREAD

All good bro. I was never trying to quit. As a result of circumstances I happened to go cold turkey for like half a year. Wasn't really a well thought out thing, not like I was crossing days off the calendar.

Don't get it, am I being slow?

Wasn't directed at you in particular. People were talking about Franco and I was just making a reference to

I dunno if I should prob include Gorgo since he drilled me with that ****ing fiancetto'ed bishop. But if I start adding all the people who have ever beaten me at anything, the universe is probably not going to be large enough to contain that list.

And also, while Dvaut1 is one of the most articulate people I've ever met/seen, he definitely overused the word "revanchist".

Looks like I'm 4-2 against you in chess hmmm

guessing ?
nah.
that is whats great with science, it can changes with the increase information it processes but it doesnt guess.

and fwiw better be safe then sorry .
maybe mask was annoying but better be annoying then end up being dead by not masking if they got it wrong..

but i suppose you are against climate changes too.
there seem to have a big misunderstanding on risk ratio on the republican camp.

enemies can be allies.
im not sure what you try to say...

"the enemy of my enemy is my friend"

Bruv, are you for real? I will drill you from here to next week.

please do.
we want see a game in the chess thread here.

Luckbox - blitz or correspondence? I fancy my chances in both. 50 bucks to charity?

My chess has gotten so bad because all I've played in years is bullet. But we can play blitz. 3:2?

Sure. I'm shitfaced, so you have a chance. Now?

Tomorrow or the next day. I'm in bed already. And isn't it 7am there and didn't you say you quit drinking?

Cocktease.

I also said I'd beat you at chess. I lie a lot.

Ill challenge you for one game if you want, i got 20 mins

Sure. Remind me of your chess.com name? Try to not hang your knight this time, that was a very sad end to our last game.

i sent challenge

No man please check again your sources.

Roe was about "viability", IE you could abort as long as the fetus couldn't survive by itself outside the womb. And that's around 22-24 weeks.

Trimesters is what we use in Italy and some other European countries (more or less).

Please prove more illiterate people vote republican than they vote democrat

In the USA yes it objectively is and it's not even close.

American soldiers killed a lot more people from fascist (going with the current definition) countries than in communist countries.

Japanese people in particular.

They for example were the only target in the history of the world of atom bombs.

So america as a country and Americans as people drew a ton more fascist blood, and were culturally praised for it, than they ever drew communist blood.

So calling someone a fascist makes it more moral under cultural American norms for him to be a target of "justified" violence than calling someone a communist and it's not even close.

Some other countries have different history, calling someone a communist I'm say Indonesia would be a bigger incitement to violence than fascism sure.

Fascism is equal to Nazi in American parlance, and btw Trump has been called a Nazi as well as a fascist many times

Topic is which label could convince some people that killing that person is morally justifiable more, IE which label is more of an incitement to violence, which violence is stochastically more likely to cause assassination attempts.

And the answer is clear cut and it's what the democrats are labeling trump and his allies.

Roe uses viability as the starting point for the state to have an interest in protecting the fetus. You claim about Roe is dead wrong.

It certainly uses trimesters as it stated that because abortion is a constitutionally protected right of privacy, the state has no ability to regulate abortions in the first trimester.

However, Casey and Roe really have to be read together.