Climate Change - increasingly horrible disasters loom
...............
there is so much out there about this - I don't really need to provide a lot of sources - a quick google search will find you thousands of links
of course there are the climate change deniers
and there are those who say what little we can do won't be nearly enough
just one link:
from the article:
"Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree*: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities. In addition, most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position. "
couldn't resist one more link - story about Siberia, one of the coldest places on earth where there is human habitation - they now face 100 degree days and multiple wildfires caused by them
https://eos.org/articles/siberian-heat-w....
.
Ah I see, so when we put out exemple of exacerbated patterns , it is random but when you say
then this is science.
Ok got it.
hopefully luciom will not beg other countries to accept him if italy got it worst one day.
we have the right to shoot him on sight if he dare go living in another country if ever climate changes hit italy hard...
luciom own words...
Ah I see, so when we put out exemple of exacerbated patterns , it is random but when you say
then this is science.
Ok got it.
climate is warming, so having more warm days (and fewer very cold days) is an expected change of that.
Same as heat waves, they will be more common and longer. And cold spells will be less common and shorter.
That's attributable to 1.x celsius warming.
Rain? not so much. Hurricanes even less and so on and on.
Higher temperatures mean more water evaporation from seas, lakes and rivers. Guess all that water vapour just stays in the sky.
The same people who claim floods are caused by increased raining because of climate change, also claim drought in Sicily is caused by climate change.
I understand the desperate attempt to try randomly to claim any negative weather event is caused by climate change but at least try to find some coherent narrative, otherwise between that and your troops devastating world class art in museums, you will keep losing.
You should argue this with the climate scientists who've been right all along despite you and the other deniers, and the existence of the Tropics with other scientists.
Their predictions now say much wetter summers in many areas leading to more flooding (along with mild winters). They have training and data. You have nothing except "climate change will be good for me in my vicinity and **** everyone else around me and in other countries".
Also the sunflowers painting wasn't destroyed or even damaged because it was behind a screen (though I'm not in favour of this particular protest).
95+ dead in Valencia flooding
If you need records to count it as evidence
Mount Fuji snowless for longest time on record after sweltering Japan summer
As of 29 October, the iconic mountain was still without snow, marking the longest period since records began 130 years ago
If you need records to count it as evidence
this is less insane to attribute to warming yes. Warmer world : less snow.
Given snow is obscenly bad for human life in general though...
Yes, let's watch human life at the top of Mount Fuji thrive now.
Less snow there means less snow where actual human beings live which is a dramatic , objective improvement for human lives, do you agree yes/no? not hard to admit less snow is better for human beings, we aren't polar bears are we?
By the same token less snow means less ice means higher sea levels means much more flooding of coastal cities means not so good.
I'm sure you don't gaf though, not being near the sea.
By the same token less snow means less ice means higher sea levels means much more flooding of coastal cities means not so good.
I'm sure you don't gaf though, not being near the sea.
sea level are supposed to increase a tad, we have decades to prepare coastal cities for that, and the netherlands with 1960s technology solved THREE METERS so the 50cm expected in 30 to 50 years are kid play with 2020s technology, it shouldn't even register as anything more than a slight inconvience.
Just to be clear the 0.1% scenario in 2100 is EXCEPTIONALLY LESS SEVERE than what the netherlands did in 1965
Reclaiming land from the sea and protecting populations living on the coast from rising sea levels are two completely different things.
It's not harder if you're a first world economy rather than a developing nation. It's very much easier.
I think developing nations in general have less access to money.
than rich countries today yes.
than the Netherlands in 1965? keep in mind the dutch were very few people who did that without crying or whining endlessly and without asking for our money, with 1965 technology.
tech now is incredibly better for everything right? so it should be far easier than for the dutch in 1965.
Is Indonesia or is mexico poorer than the dutch were in 1965?
top 5 dumbest OP of all time
you liberal, do-nothing twatz, really are ****ing stupid
