2024 ELECTION THREAD
The next presidential race will be here soon! Please see current Bovada odds. Thoughts?
Yup, I remember all of those headlines. Now show me where colleagues accused him of being a Russian asset.
Russian and China are cohorts.. I'm sure you know that.
You're a non-interventionist, correct?
No... you're arguing disingenuously now. It's all the factors that I listed in previous posts, combined. It's not one thing. It's several head scratching things. Along w/ people who work w/ her accusing her of being a Russian asset. And now... she's going to head national intelligence. Of all the qua
Gabbard is reasonable at the NIH because she credibly thinks american intelligence is deeply compromised and she never had part in that corruption.
Ofc if you don't think american intelligence works terribly for Americans (and western allies) and acts as an enemy of the country often enough you are going to hate her for that job and that's ok, it's a matter of political opinions.
I enjoy the idea that a made up concept like "woke" repels voters, but a rapist convicted criminal who tried to overthrow an election doesn't.
Nobody cares much about sex crimes and stuff if they think they will get the policies they want.
Bill Clinton is a first degree rapist. He spoke at the DNC and the campaign trail. If the race was Bill Clinton vs Mike Pence, who would you favor?
"Wokeness" is a loose, somewhat silly term but it obviously refers to real things. Males in female sport/spaces (especially minors, who have little choice). Telling whites who are barely surviving that they are privileged. Concepts like "white fragility."
Harris did not campaign on these things, but people do hate them and associate them with Dems.
Harris didn't campaign on those things but she picked an ultraprogressive campaign partner which was easily dubbed tampon Tim because he did celebrate those things as huge successes very recently as governor.
and Harris did campaign in her past on those things and all it took to "associate" those things to Harris was running videos of her defending those things a few years ago
Has anyone investigated RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA yet?
I'm sure they must be behind it all.
Nobody cares much about sex crimes and stuff if they think they will get the policies they want.
Bill Clinton is a first degree rapist. He spoke at the DNC and the campaign trail. If the race was Bill Clinton vs Mike Pence, who would you favor?
"Wokeness" is a loose, somewhat silly term but it obviously refers to real things. Males in female sport/spaces (especially minors, who have little choice). Telling whites who are barely surviving that they are privileged. Concepts like "white fragility.
I missed something. Since when is Clinton a rapist?
lol allegation
Well, it just happened.
Not sure that the convicted rapist didn't repel voters. But your candidate managed to repel them even more.
Oh did it? I hadn't heard. Like I said, I'm aware it happened, I just blame republicans for having absolutely no discernment for human excrement.
And he's not a convicted rapist.
And I didn't have a candidate. I had someone that I voted for. My party would be further left than hers.
Why do I doubt that was your response to the Judge Moore allegations?
Vox is a very dem friendly outlet. Similar articles in NYT etc.
Obviously, for Blue anon, evidence is irrelevant. But multiple witnesses, placing them at the scene, to her injuries and in whom she confided years before going public.
What's your theory? She hit herself in the face, then lied to her close friends as part of some long con?
Several friends of Broaddrick's backed up the story. Norma Rogers, who was director of nursing at Broaddrick's nursing home at the time, told reporters that she entered the hotel room shortly after the assault allegedly took place, and "found Mrs. Broaddrick crying and in 'a state of shock.' Her upper lip was puffed out and blue, and appeared to have been hit." Kelsey elaborated to the New York Times, "She told me he forced himself on her, forced her to have intercourse."
Yup, I remember all of those headlines. Now show me where colleagues accused him of being a Russian asset.
Russian and China are cohorts.. I'm sure you know that.
You're a non-interventionist, correct?
No... you're arguing disingenuously now. It's all the factors that I listed in previous posts, combined. It's not one thing. It's several head scratching things. Along w/ people who work w/ her accusing her of being a Russian asset. And now... she's going to head national intelligence. Of all the qua
Accusations, especially from chronic liars, who have no evidence are not compelling evidence of guilt.
Some pattern you see that can easily be explained away (she is a dove) is not evidence.
You keep saying you "have no idea" if she is a secret agent. You're right there
Then you launch into this other stuff. If you have no idea, just stop there.
There's no point in continuing to shoot down conspiracy points, cuz you'll just make up new ones, like China and Russia are allies. But, she has also opposed sanctions and boycott of Israel.
Probably because you are not bright enough to know better? No idea. Sounds like a you problem.
That sounds really important! Do you think they got the "alleged" part right? If so, why did you omit it?
Obviously, for Blue anon, evidence is irrelevant. But multiple witnesses, placing them at the scene, to her injuries and in whom she confided years before going public.
What's your theory? She hit herself in the face, then lied to her close friends as part of some long con?
What is blue anon? Why would evidence be irrelevant to them?
My theory is you called him a first degree rapist when he's not. Hope that helped.
Why do I doubt that was your response to the Judge Moore allegations?
Vox is a very dem friendly outlet. Similar articles in NYT etc.
Obviously, for Blue anon, evidence is irrelevant. But multiple witnesses, placing them at the scene, to her injuries and in whom she confided years before going public.
What's your theory? She hit herself in the face, then lied to her close friends as part of some long con?
For the record, if you want to argue the case and all that feel free. Just don't do it with me. I just asked how I missed that Clinton was a first degree rapist. I was not surprised to learn that I did not miss that. I have no further interest.
Well, it just happened.
Not sure that the convicted rapist didn't repel voters. But your candidate managed to repel them even more.
The incels who love Trump love that he is not afraid to use his power to grab women by the pussy. They want that power over women more than anything, and the fact that they cannot have it but think they deserve it, infuriates them. Trump gives them hope. The fact that Trump repulses the very women they long for but are incapable of wooing only strengthens their attraction for him. He is their Messiah.
Probably because you are not bright enough to know better? No idea. Sounds like a you problem.
That sounds really important! Do you think they got the "alleged" part right? If so, why did you omit it?
What is blue anon? Why would evidence be irrelevant to them?
My theory is you called him a first degree rapist when he's not. Hope that helped.
Blue anon refers to people who live in a fantasy world, like the dem version of q anon.
For example, if the story was about a "bad" politician, you would believe it with no evidence (see, Tulsi is a Russian asset).
If a woman was found beaten and crying after a man left her hotel room and said she was raped, you'd probably believe her in a neutral case. Especially if the man had an extensive history of sexual misconduct
It is a Democratic politician, so you will disregard almost any amount of evidence and believe he is innocent no matter what.
Blue anon refers to people who live in a fantasy world, like the dem version of q anon.
For example, if the story was about a "bad" politician, you would believe it with no evidence (see, Tulsi is a Russian asset).
If a woman was found beaten and crying after a man left her hotel room and said she was raped, you'd probably believe her in a neutral case. Especially if the man had an extensive history of sexual misconduct
It is a Democratic politician, so you will disregard almost any amount of evi
So it’s just projection of republican crazy on their opponent. Lozen would be proud of you.
Blue anon refers to people who live in a fantasy world, like the dem version of q anon.
For example, if the story was about a "bad" politician, you would believe it with no evidence (see, Tulsi is a Russian asset).
If a woman was found beaten and crying after a man left her hotel room and said she was raped, you'd probably believe her in a neutral case. Especially if the man had an extensive history of sexual misconduct
It is a Democratic politician, so you will disregard almost any amount of evi
Wouldn't most reasonable people? If you could bet even money on one side or the other, you'd take him in that spot? Really?
Cool. Why did you bring them up?
For example, if the story was about a "bad" politician, you would believe it with no evidence (see, Tulsi is a Russian asset).
Who told you that?
If a woman was found beaten and crying after a man left her hotel room and said she was raped, you'd probably believe her in a neutral case. Especially if the man had an extensive history of sexual misconduct
It is a Democratic politician, so you will disregard almost any amount of evidence and believe he is innocent no matter what.
Who said I disregarded evidence? I don't care at all about Bill Clinton. If he's guilty, lock his ass up. You got the wrong guy here, jack. You just said he was already considered a first degree rapist, and he wasn't. That's on you. All this BS you're ascribing to me is complete nonsense. You brought up Bill Clinton, not me. I don't care about the guy at all. But suddenly you think I worship him to the point that I'll excuse him if he raped someone. I wouldn't. I just haven't seen him be convicted of it, and I'm not going to pretend like I am in a position to judge the evidence nor am I interested in looking into it enough to bother because he's irrelevant to my life.
FYI, I wasn't an American citizen and didn't live in America at all when he was president. Please get over your weird projections about what I think of him or other people. You've seen absolutely no evidence that I think Tulsi Gabbard is a russian asset. You've seen no evidence of what I thought of the allegations about Judge Moore, but you're quick as hell to tell me what I think of them. Why is that?
