Biggest loser in online poker history wants to grind $16k
I start this with some pictures:
nl2 -$8792.18 -82 buy ins below EV
nl5 (notice that pt4 shows party poker nl5 as nl4) -$5943.81
nl10 -$773.92 -15 buy ins below EV
Total loss -$15509.91
This is me playing nl2, nl5 and nl10 on party poker for one year.
My history begins somewhere in same period when they started to show WSOP shows in television. I think I have played 12-13 years nows mainly NL2, some amount of NL5 and little bit of NL10 what is the biggest stake i've ever played.
I've read all Sklansky, all Harrington, all Miller, watched huge amount of videos, bought trackers and calculators.
Still after those years and after that all I've lost huge amount of money on those stakes. I try to play my best but losing to huge suckouts like 95/5 favorite makes me really upset.
I've lost literally all my money including all my life savings to online poker. I want to try one last time to win those money back and little bit of extra. That's why $16k. What I need is support and guiding.
I had thread on micro forum but they deleted it just when people start to understand that this is real situation and not fake.
And if you wonder where that biggest loser comes from it was said by guy who has been playing for living many years. He said I'm the biggest loser in history counted as lost buy ins.
holy ****ing **** zomg i can't believe I just found this thread.
story goes back to fall 2010, when my 21 yr old me got a 50$ bankroll from pokerstrategy; deposited that money on partypoker and started playing 2nl like a true nit.
Sadly lost my old HM database from that time, but I am 99% positive that a good chunk from the money I won to move up from the micros came indeed from Paisting.
I mean, even the people open limping 90% of hands back in 2010 knew what's up when he started tilting.
Paisting
Ironic, even in today game you would win on nl2 and on nl10 while playing with the beginner strategy from pokerstrategy.com. And then there are people like OP who can lose 150bb/100 and more while playing microstakes
Ironic, even in today game you would win on nl2 and on nl10 while playing with the beginner strategy from pokerstrategy.com
I can tell you won't. When you play even 1 month those stakes you will notice you won't. That strategy is full based on Harringtons books where you bet bet bet overpair without looking the board. Everytime you bet on nowadays micros on river with overpair you need to ask yourself if I bet with bluff would they fold. If answer is no and you 3 time barrel they show you 2 pair+ everytime.
And in fact Pokerstragy.com is just pyramid hoax and because of that blocked in many countries. They came to industry with short stack strategy that was based on just to make bigger stacks right odds to call. So that strategy made you with shorter stack flipping with bigger stacks who just made easy calls against you. Main goal was to make huge rake income to sites who did pay very well to PS. They flew people from a certain country to Gibraltar where they had full board with hotels and meals covered. I also have a screenshot as evidence showing that the PS representatives of a certain country were offered the opportunity to visit paid women for free. That's not poker, that's not poker at all.
And in fact Pokerstragy.com is just pyramid hoax and because of that blocked in many countries. They came to industry with short stack strategy that was based on just to make bigger stacks right odds to call. So that strategy made you with shorter stack flipping with bigger stacks who just made easy calls against you. Main goal was to make huge rake income to sites who did pay very well to PS. They flew people from a certain country to Gibraltar where they had full board with hotels and meals co
in other words, you'd rather spend an evening punting away 40 buy ins at 2nl than 'visit paid women for free' ?
I wish I had the discipline of Paistings to simply ignore posts he doesn't like.
Your answer is above.
It's called "expected value"
Let's say there is a suckout in 1 in 100 hands.
If you play 3500 hands, you should expect 35 suckouts
Adjust the numbers as needed, but the concept does not change.
Happy to have solved this mystery for you!
Why is this thread still open?
Respond to this or lock this idiotic thread of stupidity.
See above
Why is this thread still open?
Respond to this or lock this idiotic thread of stupidity.
See above
Sorry but your comment seems like trolling. Maybe you don’t understand game and rng very well.
What you describe is that situation that occurs with rigged rng. The more you play the more you lose to suckouts. So more hands means massive under ev running.
That’s not poker my friend. That is manipulation. If there’s suckout long run needs to compensate that. Not making it worse.
Paisting your insight has helped millions from getting scammed by the big corporate poker companies
Paisting, in our minds and in our hearts, <3
Dont think suckouts are your Problem.
Its the high rake Environment.
What you describe is that situation that occurs with rigged rng. The more you play the more you lose to suckouts. So more hands means massive under ev running.
But you barely run under EV. Only a tiny fraction of your losses come from running badly. Even if you are under EV lifetime the EV difference probably represents less than 10% of your total losses.
Like at one point towards the end of last month you were down 70 buy ins but still running slightly above EV.
Paisting u just suck mate. Don't know if you're trolling or you gaslighted youself into believing your own lies.
Sorry but your comment seems like trolling. Maybe you don’t understand game and rng very well.
What you describe is that situation that occurs with rigged rng. The more you play the more you lose to suckouts. So more hands means massive under ev running.
That’s not poker my friend. That is manipulation. If there’s suckout long run needs to compensate that. Not making it worse.
You do not understand basic probability.
Poker is not for you.
Fascinating how Paisting still doesn't understand what EV is.
I've never played GTO and never will. In fact if you look those hands where I get it in with massive equity everything has started when opponents are using too small bet sizes on situations where their never should. It's just hilariously easy to exploit them by betting big when thay bet small. Only site keeps them alive.
Paisting was using 20x pot overbet shoves before it was cool
I've never played GTO and never will. In fact if you look those hands where I get it in with massive equity everything has started when opponents are using too small bet sizes on situations where their never should. It's just hilariously easy to exploit them by betting big when thay bet small. Only site keeps them alive.
In a month like this do you buy xmas presents when the welfare arrives before you start "working" or you gamble it all from day 1?
Those days nobody makes money. So who cares about losses when everyone is loosing ......
That’s true. And in fact it’s not so common even nowadays. If you overbet small oop to blank turn on those games I play you put yourself to play guessing game on river. GTO size made you to be exploitable. These donkeys just don’t understand that.
Paisting what do you mean by paid women?
Those days nobody makes money. So who cares about losses when everyone is loosing ......
If you look those whales against me on those hands i've posted you see that the pool is worst than ever on online poker history. When everyone is losing because site is using manipulated rng everyone should care about that.
