Biggest loser in online poker history wants to grind $16k
I start this with some pictures:
nl2 -$8792.18 -82 buy ins below EV
nl5 (notice that pt4 shows party poker nl5 as nl4) -$5943.81
nl10 -$773.92 -15 buy ins below EV
Total loss -$15509.91
This is me playing nl2, nl5 and nl10 on party poker for one year.
My history begins somewhere in same period when they started to show WSOP shows in television. I think I have played 12-13 years nows mainly NL2, some amount of NL5 and little bit of NL10 what is the biggest stake i've ever played.
I've read all Sklansky, all Harrington, all Miller, watched huge amount of videos, bought trackers and calculators.
Still after those years and after that all I've lost huge amount of money on those stakes. I try to play my best but losing to huge suckouts like 95/5 favorite makes me really upset.
I've lost literally all my money including all my life savings to online poker. I want to try one last time to win those money back and little bit of extra. That's why $16k. What I need is support and guiding.
I had thread on micro forum but they deleted it just when people start to understand that this is real situation and not fake.
And if you wonder where that biggest loser comes from it was said by guy who has been playing for living many years. He said I'm the biggest loser in history counted as lost buy ins.
Everytime paintings post i think he's blatantly trolling us.
Then I see how many years he's been posting in here and realise he's not trolling
I wish I knew him IRL. This is just fascinating
So we've reached the point where the only posts Paistings responds to are the ones feeding his delusions.
I do wonder what happened in his 1 winning month. Its not like his other months were even vaguely close to breaking even, nevermind winning. Therefore what was the difference? And perhaps more interestingly would be an answer from Paisting on this? Does he feel he played differently that month?
I do wonder what happened in his 1 winning month. Its not like his other months were even vaguely close to breaking even, nevermind winning. Therefore what was the difference? And perhaps more interestingly would be an answer from Paisting on this? Does he feel he played differently that month?
He took the blue pill that month.
By the way I’ll soon publish a session that clearly demonstrates how unfairly the rng is. It’s the most brutal evidence that I’ve shown so far. I’ve also asked for comments from a software engineer on every single hand.
What do you think a software engineer will be able to tell you about the results of these hands? I am asking this seriously, I think your answer could be instructive.
What do you think a software engineer will be able to tell you about the results of these hands? I am asking this seriously, I think your answer could be instructive.
He will be told what he needs to hear and then be given a cookie, then goes home to play again and experience deja vous(another whale suckout).
Sure, most likely. But I'm curious what HE thinks a software engineer can tell him that no one else can.
I do wonder what happened in his 1 winning month. Its not like his other months were even vaguely close to breaking even, nevermind winning. Therefore what was the difference? And perhaps more interestingly would be an answer from Paisting on this? Does he feel he played differently that month?
That's not necessarily true. He often manages to put together pretty decent 10-20k hand winning stretches, then his brain snaps and he drops a 100BIs in 1000 hands and suddenly that upward trajectory is barely perceivable on the graph.
His winning month he just ran especially good and didn't tilt off as many buy ins.
That's not necessarily true. He often manages to put together pretty decent 10-20k hand winning stretches, then his brain snaps and he drops a 100BIs in 1000 hands and suddenly that upward trajectory is barely perceivable on the graph.
That's just variance, we're not talking about a normal person, even if his real winrate is -40bb/100 (that is probaby close to his true winrate when he plays his best game), with a standard deviation of 400 (he's overplaying almost every spot) he's expected to have a breakeven or better 5k hand sample around 30% of time.
Even if he is -60bb/100 bad, with high variance he can have a breakeven (or better) 5k hand sample almost 1 in 5 times.
That's not necessarily true. He often manages to put together pretty decent 10-20k hand winning stretches, then his brain snaps and he drops a 100BIs in 1000 hands and suddenly that upward trajectory is barely perceivable on the graph.
That's just variance, we're not talking about a normal person, even if his real winrate is -40bb/100 (that is probaby close to his true winrate when he plays his best game), with a standard deviation of 400 (he's overplaying almost every spot) he's expected to hav
Nah, It’s been discussed many times b4 that his ‘A game’ is only slightly losing, and you can see that in some of the graphs.
Paisting, buddy, let's go play some live poker. If you are in Canada or the USA, I can go with you and keep you company.
I think this is an excellent idea because there's a very small chance of unfair play if you play at a legit casino or card room—as opposed to online, where you think the poker site is dealing you cooler after cooler and rewarding players who bet small. You're not going to have that problem playing live.
[...]
Oops.. im out of hands.. well some other hands from today then.
I wanted to test if OP also just calls open jams with any two:
888 Poker - $0.02 NL (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4
Hero (BTN): 100 BB
PAISTING: 100 BB (VPIP: 45.65, PFR: 39.48, 3Bet Preflop: 31.34, Hands: 2,614)
BB: 380 BB (VPIP: 23.68, PFR: 18.46, 3Bet Preflop: 7.65, Hands: 1,261)
UTG: 124.5 BB (VPIP: 17.89, PFR: 9.67, 3Bet Preflop: 6.80, Hands: 288)
MP: 341.5 BB (VPIP: 14.65, PFR: 13.64, 3Bet Preflop: 8.00, Hands: 162)
CO: 780 BB (VPI
Just a reminder to new people, there are more hands in the start of the thread where people post hands they've played vs paisting where he just calls off AIs with any two. This is the main reason why he loses so incredibly much and why he is running under EV (low cards or his outs get folded preflop so his equity is less than the software suggests when he's all-in with a hand like 53o). I started reading the thread from the start because I forgot how it all began. Can't believe this thread is still alive
It was better when he called a river allin with 9 high to "show who is who".
He is immortal
He has inside him blood of whales.
He has no rival, no whale can be his equal.
There can be only one Paisting
Thanks man. That is how this has been going for years. One of the most popular topic here. Every big streamer knows me. They talk about me. Eastyy has been my fan boy from day one. When he goes to sauna with his friend Weazel the only thing they talk about is me.
Whole world can have only one Paisting.
Where's the evidence of the rng being rigged that you said you were going to post?
