Biggest loser in online poker history wants to grind $16k

One the most legendary moments of last year.

Think about how legendary it would be if you were streaming as well.

How do you expect to prove a rigged rng based on the hand histories of one session?

paisting would be one of the highest grossing streamers if he did that

Did you shove flop?

I don’t know what happened in the hand, but losing only 10 bb to a guy who usually stacks off with any2 is pretty entertaining. And he is proud of it it seems.

Probaby called a 3bet and a small cbet, then x down turn and river, wtf Pastry?

If Paisting was streaming he would be able to punish all the 100nl Whales

I bet straight pure value against him and he called. He whole challenge was going to end and he and all viewers wanted that it's against me. But I put total silence to them all. One of the biggest moments what happened online poker last year.

What moments do you consider as big or bigger?

You think easty is some poker legend and turning a two outter hand against him is a career defining moment for you?

Paisting have you ever had other poker players or a study group to actually discuss hands with?

Have you ever actually tried to seek out other players who you could learn from? If so, how did that go for you?

Being alone in this and left to figure things out entirely on your own for so long is probably why you're so unable to harmonize with the rest of the poker community, both on the table and off of it.

If you take coach or ask someone what to do on this and that spot it’s not your own money what you win. You never can be proud of yourself. That’s somebody’s else money. You didn’t figure out that yourself.

The whole point in poker and everything is to make things yourself. When you read books and figure out by yourself then it’s something you have achieved.

If you look those hands I’ve posted you see that my skill level is absolutely running those whales over. There is no single one player who can show so much massive ev spots month over month.

The problem is that when rigged rng is involved those boards even from flop are total ****ed up. Example if I watch some streamer and he goes all in with pair against two high cards the whole board is just small cards. Whole board 5 cards no single one high card. When I go all in with pair the first card is picture card and all others picture cards come to that board you can be sure. But when I have high cards there is no single one on whole board.

Lack of skill is not the problem why I’m losing. Massive skill edge seems to be problem to site.

When I release that session soon there is lots of that rigged board coverage.

This might be your most delusional post yet. You have 20 years of evidence that you're playing bad and you're actively avoiding getting better.

You can't seriously believe what you wrote is true. Just because someone taught you doesn't take anything away from what you achieve. We all learn from others in some capacity and on the second part quoted here I want to ask why is reading what someone is teaching different?

I learned how to drive by watching my father driving and what he was doing with the controls when I was younger. He never directly taught me but my ability to drive is still down to him. Time to listen to others bud, I would like to see you succeed and I truly mean that.

Biggest positive turning point in my poker carrier was becoming more social in poker community and finding poker friend with whom I exchanged idea regularly. Later found couch to elevate my game even higher.

Having a coach is no different than taking a course or going to school.
Also a coach doesnt automatically make you a winner, you still need to put in a lot effort and can be proud of yourself if you achieve your goals.
Most top poker players had a coach at one point.

How far did you go in school, Paisting?

How old you were when you dropped out / finished?

wtf is school!? paisting obviously figured it allon his own, otherwise none of his genius would truly be his

Paistings is the 2nd oddest thing about this thread.
The people continually giving him advice are odder.

He's clearly not going to listen to one thing you say. Save the essays and just lol at the journey

I have some questions if you don't mind:

1) What are your goals in 2025 besides getting every site shut down which will totally happen once you release your sessions proving that online poker is and always has been rigged?

2) Will you write a book about your experiences? And if so, what will the title be?

3) What will you do with all your money when the book makes you millions of dollars and you're on the cover of Forbes for exposing the great poker hoax?

4) How will you fill your time once your great decades long mission of getting online poker shut down is finally complete?

5) How does it feel knowing that you know things that the millions of other people who have played online poker don't? How does it feel to be the only one who sees the truth?

6) If you could talk to your younger self, what would you tell him?

THIS IS WHAT ONE SESSION IS LOOKING LIKE IN MANIPULATED RNG ENVIRONMENT

This is what you've been waiting for. Single session in highly suspicious environment with lots of suckouts and suspicious board runouts. This session runned 8,5 buy ins below ev. Session was 3,5 hours long and contains 2k hands.

I lost during this session:

2 times with 80%+ equity
5 times 70-80% equity
4 times 65-70% equity
and 1 time massive multiway pot with and absurd outcome

I should have won over 20 dollars but session ended with 60 dollar losses. We go through every hand with detailed information and then there is comment from long term software engineer. That guy is one those who has made detailed information for me how manipulated rng works from the point how that is created and how that works in everyday game environment. After couple of hands you can clearly see the patterns that repeatedly occurs after the flop is dealt.

888Poker Snap, Hold'em No Limit - $0.05/$0.10 - 6 players

Phiip (UTG): $5.88 (59 bb)
zwhitte (MP): $21.10 (211 bb)
Time4Revenge (CO): $30.76 (308 bb)
pajolaa (BU): $5.94 (59 bb)
thykk_slycce (SB): $10.63 (106 bb)
Paisting (BB): $10.00 (100 bb)

Pre-Flop: ($0.15) Hero (Paisting) is BB with T♥ 8♠
4 players fold, thykk_slycce (SB) raises to $0.30, Paisting (BB) calls $0.20

Flop: ($0.60) 8♦ T♠ 6♠ (2 players)
thykk_slycce (SB) bets $0.30, Paisting (BB) raises to $9.70 (all-in), thykk_slycce (SB) calls $9.40

Turn: ($20) Q♦ (2 players, 1 all-in)

River: ($20) Q♣ (2 players, 1 all-in)

Total pot: $20 (Rake: $1)

Showdown:
Paisting (BB) shows T♥ 8♠ (two pair, Queens and Tens)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 27%, Flop: 85%, Turn: 86%, River: 0%)

thykk_slycce (SB) shows A♣ T♣ (two pair, Queens and Tens - higher kicker)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 73%, Flop: 15%, Turn: 14%, River: 100%)

thykk_slycce (SB) wins $19

Paisting: We call against known hole head whale here. On flop we hit total jackpot and when there is no single one turn card we or he want to see, it's really easy to put him pay when we are light years ahead. Runout is so absurd but really typical. Worst player with massive errors get rewarded after been put losing position with only 2 moves from me.

Software engineer: This hand is a textbook example of how a manipulated rng operates. The boards are constructed so precisely to favor the weaker player right from the start, and such a runout even allows incredibly weak hands to win by the river. Equity shows that you should win 85% of the time, but if we could observe the initial setup and how the rng drives this hand forward, the real numbers would put you closer to being a 40% underdog in the long run.

888Poker Snap, Hold'em No Limit - $0.05/$0.10 - 6 players

Jon4818 (UTG): $1.96 (20 bb)
Paisting (MP): $10.00 (100 bb)
Fernandosrs (CO): $15.26 (153 bb)
Malafamero (BU): $11.29 (113 bb)
2021X (SB): $26.83 (268 bb)
LorsYakub (BB): $5.85 (59 bb)

Pre-Flop: ($0.15) Hero (Paisting) is MP with K♣ K♥
Jon4818 (UTG) calls $0.10, Paisting (MP) raises to $0.50, 4 players fold, Jon4818 (UTG) calls $0.40

Flop: ($1.15) 7♦ 9♣ 6♣ (2 players)
Jon4818 (UTG) checks, Paisting (MP) bets $9.50 (all-in), Jon4818 (UTG) calls $1.46 (all-in)

Turn: ($4.07) 9♠ (2 players, 2 all-in)

River: ($4.07) T♣ (2 players, 2 all-in)

Total pot: $4.07 (Rake: $0.20)

Showdown:
Paisting (MP) shows K♣ K♥ (two pair, Kings and Nines)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 86%, Flop: 81%, Turn: 5%, River: 0%)

Jon4818 (UTG) shows Q♠ 9♦ (three of a kind, Nines)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 14%, Flop: 19%, Turn: 95%, River: 100%)

Jon4818 (UTG) wins $3.87

Paisting: Limper whale punishment and same kind of flop like earlier with no single one good turn card. Surprisingly turn pairs the most possible cards whale can have. I lose 9/10 of these hands where small stack whale limps and calls with total crap.

Software engineer: This hand plays out almost identically to the first one. Not only does the top pair improve, clearly the most likely hand for this player, but potential draws also hit by the river. Players with small stacks are incredibly important to the poker sites. If they lose their money quickly, as they're clearly just experimenting without any understanding of proper strategy, they'll likely never return. However, if they win hands like these and get the impression that the game is easy or that they're lucky, they might stick around and become long-term players. Their playing style also generates significant rake for the site.

888Poker Snap, Hold'em No Limit - $0.05/$0.10 - 6 players

zwhitte (UTG): $24.32 (243 bb)
Malafamero (MP): $10.76 (108 bb)
Paisting (CO): $10.00 (100 bb)
spiderarmy (BU): $17.28 (173 bb)
juscielweber (SB): $3.43 (34 bb)
AshiHarra15 (BB): $10.12 (101 bb)

Pre-Flop: ($0.15) Hero (Paisting) is CO with Q♦ Q♠
2 players fold, Paisting (CO) raises to $0.40, 1 fold, juscielweber (SB) calls $0.35, 1 fold

Flop: ($0.90) 8♠ 3♥ 7♦ (2 players)
juscielweber (SB) checks, Paisting (CO) bets $0.77, juscielweber (SB) calls $0.77

Turn: ($2.44) T♣ (2 players)
juscielweber (SB) checks, Paisting (CO) bets $2.44, juscielweber (SB) calls $2.26 (all-in)

River: ($6.96) 9♣ (2 players, 1 all-in)

Total pot: $6.96 (Rake: $0.35)

Showdown:
Paisting (CO) shows Q♦ Q♠ (a pair of Queens)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 81%, Flop: 78%, Turn: 80%, River: 0%)

juscielweber (SB) shows J♥ T♥ (a straight, Seven to Jack)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 19%, Flop: 22%, Turn: 20%, River: 100%)

juscielweber (SB) wins $6.61

Paisting: Whale with small stack calls from blinds and on flop we can shove or bet smaller, both works to get his money in. Flop is again identical with not good turn cards, but I think he's stack size is small we can this time to bet smaller. On turn board is getting more and more weak hand favourable so money in and mouth open looking he these runouts can be even possible.

Software engineer: We can pose the question: what inherently strong hand can actually hold up as the winner by the river, especially when we know that a short-stacked player like this isn’t folding at any stage? It takes very little for a weaker player to have in hand before these four card straight boards start appearing. By the time this player has hit the call button, the rng has already determined the board to favor them.

It's important to note that a board like this always benefits the player with the weakest cards in these positions. Conversely, the same board inherently works against premium starting hands.

888Poker Snap, Hold'em No Limit - $0.05/$0.10 - 6 players

Time4Revenge (UTG): $16.30 (163 bb)
PENZesSARM10 (MP): $18.37 (184 bb)
Paisting (CO): $14.53 (145 bb)
___27___ (BU): $10.90 (109 bb)
sylja (SB): $4.10 (41 bb)
zwhitte (BB): $17.48 (175 bb)

Pre-Flop: ($0.15) Hero (Paisting) is CO with 6♣ 3♣
2 players fold, Paisting (CO) raises to $0.40, ___27___ (BU) calls $0.40, 2 players fold

Flop: ($0.95) 5♠ 4♦ 9♠ (2 players)
Paisting (CO) bets $0.71, ___27___ (BU) calls $0.71

Turn: ($2.37) 7♥ (2 players)
Paisting (CO) bets $13.42 (all-in), ___27___ (BU) calls $9.79 (all-in)

River: ($21.95) 4♥ (2 players, 2 all-in)

Total pot: $21.95 (Rake: $1.23)

Showdown:
Paisting (CO) shows 6♣ 3♣ (a straight, Three to Seven)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 18%, Flop: 26%, Turn: 77%, River: 0%)

___27___ (BU) shows 9♣ 9♥ (a full house, Nines full of Fours)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 82%, Flop: 74%, Turn: 23%, River: 100%)

___27___ (BU) wins $20.72

Paisting: We open against weak passive players mostly to punish them playing too tight and too passive. Everything goes just like I thought when I see the cards first. I was really sure what he has on turn but then the river pairs. That his river call is just absolute disastrous and I'm sure those weak lines he makes are the reason why he is more favoured in the hand.

Software engineer: In this hand, we can reflect on the large number of hands you've shown where your set gets cracked. I dare say, and this is backed by reviewing your database, that the instances where the board pairs to save you are vanishingly small compared to situations where you're up against a weak and passive player. While weak and passive play doesn't look good in poker strategy, under a manipulated rng it elevates the player's chances.

888Poker Snap, Hold'em No Limit - $0.05/$0.10 - 6 players

Old_Den (UTG): $31.63 (316 bb)
Cesar2632 (MP): $12.42 (124 bb)
666emo66 (CO): $2.66 (27 bb)
Balik91 (BU): $3.89 (39 bb)
Bradysscn (SB): $5.65 (57 bb)
Paisting (BB): $10.00 (100 bb)

Pre-Flop: ($0.15) Hero (Paisting) is BB with 6♦ 5♣
3 players fold, Balik91 (BU) raises to $0.40, 1 fold, Paisting (BB) calls $0.30

Flop: ($0.85) 2♣ 5♥ 9♣ (2 players)
Paisting (BB) bets $9.60 (all-in), Balik91 (BU) calls $3.49 (all-in)

Turn: ($7.83) 2♦ (2 players, 2 all-in)

River: ($7.83) 9♦ (2 players, 2 all-in)

Total pot: $7.83 (Rake: $0.44)

Showdown:
Paisting (BB) shows 6♦ 5♣ (two pair, Nines and Fives)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 45%, Flop: 76%, Turn: 5%, River: 0%)

Balik91 (BU) shows Q♣ 2♥ (a full house, Twos full of Nines)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 55%, Flop: 24%, Turn: 95%, River: 100%)

Balik91 (BU) wins $7.39

Paisting: Massive whale steals. On flop we need one hit and are always ahead. He's every stats blinking green after 2 rounds on table. We don't ever want to take risk to see him check turn. Error comes from calling when we talk about these players. Weakest hit you can get when your brains are not working at all and then site rewards.

Software engineer: Both potential hits for the weak player in this situation are pairing hands. A weak player would also have beaten all the strong pairs here. The outcome of this hand is determined by the player profile, stats, and previously played hands. There's nothing random about this board either. It's a very typical result, one we've already seen several times in nearly identical fashion during this session.

888Poker Snap, Hold'em No Limit - $0.05/$0.10 - 6 players

ExMachina (UTG): $10.58 (106 bb)
ThGodfather (MP): $11.89 (119 bb)
dandiden888 (CO): $2.91 (29 bb)
Sebas66438 (BU): $73.36 (734 bb)
nildsen2009 (SB): $16.77 (168 bb)
Paisting (BB): $11.65 (117 bb)

Pre-Flop: ($0.15) Hero (Paisting) is BB with T♠ 7♦
2 players fold, dandiden888 (CO) raises to $0.22, 2 players fold, Paisting (BB) calls $0.12

Flop: ($0.49) J♣ T♥ 8♠ (2 players)
Paisting (BB) checks, dandiden888 (CO) bets $0.24, Paisting (BB) calls $0.24

Turn: ($0.97) 9♦ (2 players)
Paisting (BB) bets $11.19 (all-in), dandiden888 (CO) calls $2.45 (all-in)

River: ($5.87) J♠ (2 players, 2 all-in)

Total pot: $5.87 (Rake: $0.29)

Showdown:
Paisting (BB) shows T♠ 7♦ (a straight, Seven to Jack)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 29%, Flop: 14%, Turn: 72%, River: 0%)

dandiden888 (CO) shows 8♣ 8♦ (a full house, Eights full of Jacks)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 71%, Flop: 86%, Turn: 28%, River: 100%)

dandiden888 (CO) wins $5.58

From set to straight then pairs again.

888Poker Snap, Hold'em No Limit - $0.05/$0.10 - 6 players

Malafamero (UTG): $10.77 (108 bb)
spiderarmy (MP): $16.48 (165 bb)
m4ke2u (CO): $8.04 (80 bb)
Paisting (BU): $10.00 (100 bb)
Old_Den (SB): $33.59 (336 bb)
2021X (BB): $27.08 (271 bb)

Pre-Flop: ($0.15) Hero (Paisting) is BTN with 9♠ 7♠
2 players fold, m4ke2u (CO) calls $0.10, Paisting (BU) raises to $0.50, 1 fold, 2021X (BB) calls $0.40, m4ke2u (CO) calls $0.40

Flop: ($1.55) Q♠ 5♠ T♠ (3 players)
2021X (BB) checks, m4ke2u (CO) checks, Paisting (BU) bets $9.50 (all-in), 2021X (BB) folds, m4ke2u (CO) calls $7.54 (all-in)

Turn: ($16.63) T♦ (2 players, 2 all-in)

River: ($16.63) K♠ (2 players, 2 all-in)

Total pot: $16.63 (Rake: $0.83)

Showdown:
Paisting (BU) shows 9♠ 7♠ (a flush, King high)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 32%, Flop: 71%, Turn: 84%, River: 0%)

m4ke2u (CO) shows A♠ 9♣ (a flush, Ace high)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 68%, Flop: 29%, Turn: 16%, River: 100%)

m4ke2u (CO) wins $15.80

888Poker Snap, Hold'em No Limit - $0.05/$0.10 - 6 players

Ronnaldoh (UTG): $10.38 (104 bb)
Paisting (MP): $11.18 (112 bb)
Tomipoll (CO): $3.90 (39 bb)
Balik91 (BU): $12.53 (125 bb)
ThGodfather (SB): $10.35 (104 bb)
Malafamero (BB): $10.00 (100 bb)

Pre-Flop: ($0.15) Hero (Paisting) is MP with J♦ J♠
Ronnaldoh (UTG) calls $0.10, Paisting (MP) raises to $0.50, 1 fold, Balik91 (BU) 3-bets to $2, 3 players fold, Paisting (MP) 4-bets to $11.18 (all-in), Balik91 (BU) calls $9.18

Flop: ($22.61) T♥ K♥ A♣ (2 players, 1 all-in)

Turn: ($22.61) 3♥ (2 players, 1 all-in)

River: ($22.61) 4♦ (2 players, 1 all-in)

Total pot: $22.61 (Rake: $1.27)

Showdown:
Paisting (MP) shows J♦ J♠ (a pair of Jacks)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 69%, Flop: 25%, Turn: 14%, River: 0%)

Balik91 (BU) shows A♦ 6♦ (a pair of Aces)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 31%, Flop: 75%, Turn: 86%, River: 100%)

Balik91 (BU) wins $21.34

888Poker Snap, Hold'em No Limit - $0.05/$0.10 - 6 players

lottabyte (UTG): $5.18 (52 bb)
Mikeflush (MP): $10.29 (103 bb)
Paisting (CO): $10.58 (106 bb)
zwhitte (BU): $14.70 (147 bb)
Sebas66438 (SB): $10.00 (100 bb)
juscielweber (BB): $3.96 (40 bb)

Pre-Flop: ($0.15) Hero (Paisting) is CO with 7♥ 5♥
lottabyte (UTG) calls $0.10, Mikeflush (MP) raises to $0.30, Paisting (CO) calls $0.30, 3 players fold, lottabyte (UTG) calls $0.20

Flop: ($1.05) 6♥ 9♣ 8♦ (3 players)
lottabyte (UTG) checks, Mikeflush (MP) checks, Paisting (CO) bets $10.28 (all-in), lottabyte (UTG) calls $4.88 (all-in), Mikeflush (MP) calls $9.99 (all-in)

Turn: ($25.91) J♥ (3 players, 3 all-in)

River: ($25.91) Q♣ (3 players, 3 all-in)

Total pot: $25.91 (Rake: $1.29)

Showdown:
Paisting (CO) shows 7♥ 5♥ (a straight, Five to Nine)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 29%, Flop: 68%, Turn: 19%, River: 0%)

lottabyte (UTG) shows J♦ 9♦ (two pair, Jacks and Nines)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 33%, Flop: 10%, Turn: 10%, River: 0%)

Mikeflush (MP) shows Q♠ T♣ (a straight, Eight to Queen)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 38%, Flop: 22%, Turn: 71%, River: 100%)

Mikeflush (MP) wins $24.62

888Poker Snap, Hold'em No Limit - $0.05/$0.10 - 6 players

JXRD4NBMT (UTG): $2.36 (24 bb)
Shark230 (MP): $14.17 (142 bb)
Paisting (CO): $11.01 (110 bb)
Old_Den (BU): $9.63 (96 bb)
Anonim77 (SB): $3.31 (33 bb)
spiderarmy (BB): $13.74 (137 bb)

Pre-Flop: ($0.15) Hero (Paisting) is CO with Q♦ Q♥
JXRD4NBMT (UTG) raises to $2.36 (all-in), 1 fold, Paisting (CO) 3-bets to $11.01 (all-in), 3 players fold

Flop: ($4.87) 8♥ K♥ 5♥ (2 players, 2 all-in)

Turn: ($4.87) 9♣ (2 players, 2 all-in)

River: ($4.87) 6♠ (2 players, 2 all-in)

Total pot: $4.87 (Rake: $0.24)

Showdown:
Paisting (CO) shows Q♦ Q♥ (a pair of Queens)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 67%, Flop: 43%, Turn: 25%, River: 0%)

JXRD4NBMT (UTG) shows K♠ J♠ (a pair of Kings)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 33%, Flop: 57%, Turn: 75%, River: 100%)

JXRD4NBMT (UTG) wins $4.63

888Poker Snap, Hold'em No Limit - $0.05/$0.10 - 6 players

Time4Revenge (UTG): $13.11 (131 bb)
Anonim77 (MP): $3.34 (33 bb)
LCD_28 (CO): $10.83 (108 bb)
jaopedrin200 (BU): $1.47 (15 bb)
adadasd123 (SB): $25.09 (251 bb)
Paisting (BB): $10.00 (100 bb)

Pre-Flop: ($0.15) Hero (Paisting) is BB with A♠ K♦
Time4Revenge (UTG) raises to $0.25, 2 players fold, jaopedrin200 (BU) 3-bets to $1.47 (all-in), 1 fold, Paisting (BB) 4-bets to $10 (all-in), 1 fold

Flop: ($3.24) 5♦ 6♥ 7♥ (2 players, 2 all-in)

Turn: ($3.24) 5♠ (2 players, 2 all-in)

River: ($3.24) 4♣ (2 players, 2 all-in)

Total pot: $3.24 (Rake: $0.16)

Showdown:
Paisting (BB) shows A♠ K♦ (a pair of Fives)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 66%, Flop: 52%, Turn: 68%, River: 0%)

jaopedrin200 (BU) shows Q♠ 8♣ (a straight, Four to Eight)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 34%, Flop: 48%, Turn: 32%, River: 100%)

jaopedrin200 (BU) wins $3.08

888Poker Snap, Hold'em No Limit - $0.05/$0.10 - 6 players

Paisting (UTG): $10.00 (100 bb)
Stahlwolle65 (MP): $9.72 (97 bb)
Malafamero (CO): $19.14 (191 bb)
Augekas (BU): $17.95 (180 bb)
Old_Den (SB): $32.57 (326 bb)
LinZhao (BB): $3.42 (34 bb)

Pre-Flop: ($0.15) Hero (Paisting) is UTG with A♥ A♠
Paisting (UTG) raises to $0.40, 1 fold, Malafamero (CO) 3-bets to $1.50, Augekas (BU) calls $1.50, 1 fold, LinZhao (BB) 4-bets to $3.42 (all-in), Paisting (UTG) calls $3.02, Malafamero (CO) 5-bets to $19.14 (all-in), Augekas (BU) calls $16.45 (all-in), Paisting (UTG) calls $6.58 (all-in)

Flop: ($49.37) 8♥ K♣ 7♥ (4 players, 4 all-in)

Turn: ($49.37) 6♦ (4 players, 4 all-in)

River: ($49.37) T♠ (4 players, 4 all-in)

Total pot: $49.37 (Rake: $2)

Showdown:
Malafamero (CO) shows T♣ T♦ (three of a kind, Tens)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 19%, Flop: 9%, Turn: 5%, River: 0%)

LinZhao (BB) shows 9♣ 9♥ (a straight, Six to Ten)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 16%, Flop: 11%, Turn: 15%, River: 100%)

Paisting (UTG) shows A♥ A♠ (a pair of Aces)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 60%, Flop: 73%, Turn: 75%, River: 0%)

Augekas (BU) shows A♣ K♠ (a pair of Kings)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 4%, Flop: 8%, Turn: 5%, River: 0%)

Malafamero (CO) wins $34.33
LinZhao (BB) wins $13.04

Software engineer: This is one of those big hands that bring weak players back to the tables. The sites want to do everything they can to ensure these high stakes situations occur and that weak players come out ahead in them. It's also worth paying attention to the board’s runout, which once again clearly favors the calling weak passive player.

Paisting, you know that making one website does not qualify you as software engineer...

But good stuff, very entertaining

He officially lost his mind. 😵

LMAO