SMP Life is Being Drunk -Random Content thread
Politics has one and its fun, so I figured I'd start one here and see how it goes. Obv you should, but are not requried
From the WSJ on verbal flubs spoken at executive sales meetings.
"Too many cooks in the soup."
"Read between the tea leaves"
"We need to talk about the elephant in the closet."
"I'm not trying to beat a dead horse to death."
But "as happy as a canary in a coal mine", may not be all that much of a flub. Who else has so many friends who are always so happy to see him and so sad to see him go.
PairTheBoard
Fire this email off to all the corporations you hate having your data
To whom it may concern,
This notice is to inform you that I am requesting to have my personal data deleted from your records.
My contact information is as follows:
Full Legal Name:
Address:
Telephone Number:
Email:
The reason I am requesting deletion of my personal data is as follows: consent for you posessing my data is being revoked.
The information that I am specifically aware of, that you process or retain, is (but is not limited to) as follows:
Any data of or on myself, my account, my past actions, my cookies, my dealings with your corporation, my usages of your services, and any/all other data regarding or related to myself with the exception of data you are not allowed to delete under juristicrion of the great state of ______ and the federal government of ________.
Please respond in writing to confirm that my request has been recieved.
From the WSJ on verbal flubs spoken at executive sales meetings.
"Too many cooks in the soup."
"Read between the tea leaves"
"We need to talk about the elephant in the closet."
"I'm not trying to beat a dead horse to death."
But "as happy as a canary in a coal mine", may not be all that much of a flub.
Isn't mixed metaphor the more accurate term here?
Overheard in the pub the other night: "Too many straws that broke the camel's back."
Koji Fungus
PairTheBoard
Every Perspective is a Dimension of Existence.
PairTheBoard
The Universe is the computer that computes the virtual reality in which we live.
PairTheBoard
The Universe is the computer that computes the virtual reality in which we live.
PairTheBoard
I've been pondering this for a while. Relativity and quantumn physics are expected by considering the universe as a computer.
Another thing we would expect the universe as computer to do is create the unseen distant world as we bring it into view. Does this have any implications for physics we could expect/test for?
I've been pondering this for a while. Relativity and quantumn physics are expected by considering the universe as a computer.
Another thing we would expect the universe as computer to do is create the unseen distant world as we bring it into view. Does this have any implications for physics we could expect/test for?
hi chez
Suppose you replace the sand in an hourglass with a random amount of randomly sized grains of sand. You ask, how long will it take for the sand to run through. You could try to calculate it by examining each grain of sand and analyzing how the flow is disrupted as different combinations of sand sizes fit through the Narrow. Suppose you conclude the flow is so chaotic that the problem is not computable. However, you can also just turn the glass over and time it as you let it run. Then you could say that the device itself amounts a computer tailored specifically for calculating the answer to this "non-computable" problem.
It's in this sense I'm saying the "Universe" is a "computer" that "calculates" our "reality". And since our "Reality" is the result of the "calculations" of a "computer" you could say it's a "Virtual Reality".
I think this is more than just a play on words. It invites a closer look at what we mean by them and the perspectives they invoke. What are the metaphysics behind our perspectives as we look at this from various angles?
PairTheBoard
It would mean that the universe is finite, for one thing.
It would mean that non-computable real numbers don't exist in the universe, because not even the universe can compute them.
Bostrom’s argument presumes some kind of dualism—a “base” reality distinct from the “simulated” one.
Digital physics (like Wolfram, Lloyd) usually leans toward monism—the universe just is computation.
Mystical takes or nondualist philosophies offer a deeper twist—maybe the simulation metaphor is just a lens, and reality is nondual, appearing computational, but ultimately indivisible.
.....
Will an AI observer collapse the wave function if used in the double slit experiment.
Anything that interacts with a quantum system and takes a specific measurement does so, so yes.
Any thoughts on how this might affect Wigner's Friend?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wigner%27s....
PairTheBoard
Any thoughts on how this might affect Wigner's Friend?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wigner%27s....
PairTheBoard
Almost no physicists believe in collapse by consciousness, so it doesn't matter if one says that the wave collapsed into a cheeseburger
Any thoughts on how this might affect Wigner's Friend?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wigner%27s....
PairTheBoard
It makes me think that my Mrs Schridinger thought experiment wasn't first
It helps to think about the Mrs Shrodinger problem
Mr Shrodinger is doing his usual thing with the cat. But he is in a bigger box with Mrs Shrodinger overseeing. If she doens't look inside the box then is that cat alive or dead. What difference does it make if Mr Shrodinger has opened his box and observed the cat?
There is no paradox. Just parantheses
Hi BTM
We are witnesses to existence.
PairTheBoard
