How to play online poker according to a software algorithm - iPoker, Red Star Poker room

Ok...

I see you are just seeking for an attention. Maybe because you are a lifelong losing poker player or just a man with gambling issues. Or you just have a sad life and not much to do.

So I just stop writing here

In fact, you are wrong - in every aspect:

1. I'm a winning lifelong player

2. I'm not seeking for any since I got a lot of communications in a real life. And I wouldn't go for 10 countries informational exchange, if i weren't experienced in negotiations (if you got more life experience you would understand that)

3. I haven't played online poker for 3 years actually, I don't know if i got gambling issues, since i just don't play the game 😃 (only to test the software on a very low limits. Testing - is a specific playing, it's not gambling)

4. I'm actually waiting for this "rig" topic to end, cause it's a waste of my lifetime, i don't like it. Just decided to contribute something and to stop this fraud

Let me provide my guesses:

1. You don't even know the details of my research, and you have no idea why I decided to send it to Gambling supervisors.

2. You are a winning online player, and you don't care even if your nation loses huge amount of money playing international scam. You are just an egoist. And I won't say sorry for this guess, because it directly comes from your statements.

But the most important question:

Is it really important who I am, since I provide the evidence and all the materials? Thank you for your attention towards me personally, really. But I'm here to discuss the scam (to inform players). You can just watch the materials, make your conclusions.

I think it's pretty interesting info to share, since a pretty big period of playing data involved 😃

Decided to share with you. It's a "small" off-top, though, cause it's not only about iPoker. But about all the online poker fairness and transparency ))

For the sake of interest I checked my all-time statistics. There are no only Absolute Poker nor Bet365 poker (where I managed to reach 2 500$ when I was a student, starting from 2$ won on Absolute Poker freeroll).

Guys, this is exactly what I saw while I have been playing in different rooms. But it's a pure "fun" in numbers -

These are my first 100 tournaments played in any room after a break in gaming. Or, right after the first registration in the online-poker casino.

Almost all of this - Sit&Go tournaments (from 45 to 180 entries). Is it normal? 😃
Always winning first 100 tournaments?? You kidding me.. ))

Any comments? 😃

And this is if we include only 50 first tournaments played, but not 100 first -

Only one of 9 starts in the room gave me a small minus on MTT SnG? 😃

I feel so cool now, guys. I'm just a poker god according to this stats.

More then that - 50 first tournaments is a period when I try to get used to a software, try to remember what poker is... It's a joke to discuss if I played really well there.

Well... Yeah, online poker is random and fair place to play, it's all good 👌

Some guy joins a room. Not me, but someone don't even know the rules of the game. And we all, not only me, nor only you start to lose badly. Great!

It's funny, that almost every room's website got links to "responsible gaming" but at the same time, they just involve people to play the rigged game. Nice one. Great social behavior ))

A comment for a pro players.

Guys, what ROI level should I do, to win 8 of 9 MTT SnG 50 tournaments steaks? Well, at least 150%? 😃

But it's not about my ROI obviously, right?

Means, since rooms involve newcomers in the game, then at the same moment other guys on the table (including yourself) lose real money. It's a pure case of a fraud. Any other ideas?

Hello, guys!

New critically important information appeared.

During discussion on the biggest Russian poker forum some players considered my "observation of a highly critical flop hitting with a folded hand" as a cognitive distortion. So, I decided to analyze it carefully.

Here are the results of the analysis - does iPoker's software provokes a player, who often folds his hands (I avoid playing postflop on Red Star, since, according to the materials I have provided you above - the postflop is totally manipulated by the software algorithm)

by dealing flops according to a folded by this player hand?

What does this mean, and how it looks in game.

Once I start to fold preflop hands too often, the software starts to generate flops which "shows me" a pair flopped or better EXTREMELY often -

These are five consecutive (!) flops.

During the test of only 173 flops (4 tournaments played only) I even managed to met this kind of sequence (guys, I have to warn you, if you an impressionable person, don't watch this 😀, it's dangerous 😃)

(I didn't hit the flop here, but I show all the flops one by one)

(I don't hit here too)

(93o didn't even ruined a plan of the software to show me a "potential" top pair flopped :P)

We skip ONLY 7 flops and -

Applause... To developers of Playtech PLC. Even a chance of the last free screens are 17.54% * 0.09% * 17.54% = 0.003% (3 cases of 100 000).

I made a full video-evidence of tournaments played for the analysis. I want to stress, that these tournaments where played AFTER I provided the hypothesis about software provoking by dealing "good flops".

So it's not about distance. It's about "Johnmir guessed something that happenes 4 times of 1 000 000 tries".

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1HPf2urc3J_0GrXz0l0Kzv-1aOnADjtIw/view?usp=sharing

20 minutes video. Where you can make sure the data is correct.

This disgrace will be obviously sent to the Gambling Supervision Authorities - The UK Gambling Commission - the regulator of Playtech PLC, and to the Curacao Gambling Board.

I have been already waiting for the answer of Curacao for 3 weeks.

CuracaoEgaming just ignored the information regarding rigging of a postflop vs sit-out player. Is iPoker regulated somehow? What is going on, guys, seriously? What is online poker?

You arent a lifelong winning player. You lose at 10nl with an ev loss rate of -10bb/100 and you play 0.50 SNG barely breakeven.

And yes its really important who you are. Because you say you are a poker (and data) expert but in fact you are a truly insane man, mad at the poker world because you cannot beat 10nl

Im here the provide more data than John has ever done and its all sample of his hands.
This shows over many many hands Johnmir cannot even beat the micros and is a sad sad loser mad at poker, so it must be rigged.

Here are his results and keep in mind. He describes himself as a professional level player HAHAHAHAHAH

John you are wasting your time with curacao. They dont even act on real grievances and wont even respond to your made up accusations.

That being said i for one am convinced now. You being cheated is the only possible explanation as to why you would beat the games in 2008 but get your ass handed to you in 2020.

he was never beating the games and he never will

Slugant, you got a chance to understand what is going on in iPoker net, watching my videos. In stead of this you do what? 😀

You send here some childlike screens of testing PS and iPoker's software on micros?

Man, I played 700+ 3$ Spin&Go on Pokerstars to test the soft, also. What does it change?

I mean, do you really think any micro-limit player will ever go for this analysis of the game. Lol, you comments look too ... like you can't calculate 2+2! ))

In fact, is it really important, what limits do I play, how I play it. Watch out man!

https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/s...ostcount=93403

If you are good at poker, you open the materials, and you comment THE MATERIALs.

If you are not good at poker - you discuss micros in the thread, where adult people discuss iPoker's scam 😀

Donjonnie, mate... 😀

"They dont even act on real grievances and wont even respond to your made up accusations."

Is it really possible to type this with no providing ANY specific comment about the materials?

Lol, looks like it is. Deep insight, man!

You can open those video-materials and check everything. But saying "made up accusations" without pointing AT LEAST SOMETHING. Just a joke, sorry. Not even serious.

More then that, if you read the topic attentively (yeah, it's also bad of you, not to be simply attentive but commenting) - you will see, that I got answers of The UK Gambling Commission (regarding Playtech PLC), The Czech Republic Ministry of Finance.

So why those countries decided to resend my research to their intelligence teams? Would be much easier to answer "RSP Entertainment N.V. is not registered here, we can't help you"/"You research is not well-prepared" in stead.

Or do you mean, they just decided to lie about the resending the info to special teams? Is it you point?

Johnmir, why you only show screenshots of self made samples? Why do you never use raw data?? Because that is objective data and you are a loser there.

you say "do you really think any micro-limit player will ever go for this analysis of the game?"
Yes, i do think that because I see one doing it and its you. Only I wont go so far to call your delusional ramblings an analysis. If you are better than a micro limit player why not clean up midstakes? Heck, why not start by actually beating micro stakes.

On raw data (so unedited fair data) you are a loser at both ipoker & pokerstars. At both cash games & tournaments. And you never played higher than micros. And this data is mined and unedited, unlike your way tinier samples.
Lets say you win 1 week out of the year and lose the other 51... Normal people would say they are not that good.
You would say that you had 1 winning week therefore you are of "professional level" (hahahahaha) and the other 51 weeks you lose because its rigged. You show a sample of 700 games where you've won, well ive provided a sample of 7000 (10x as much) games where you've lost. Which says more you think???

No its because you are really really bad at poker and to be fair just basic math. And you can spew your lies again that you are a top analyst or whatever. A top analyst would never spend so much time at 10nl and making tons of excel sheets without ever using raw data.

John, you need help. And probably meds too.

Donjonnie, you say -
"John you are wasting your time with curacao. They dont even act on real grievances and wont even respond to your made up accusations."

After this you say - "I am just trying to help you out as you do not seem to understand the gambling industry and and regulations."

Lol! So what was this authorities were crated for?

You explain me something "If you got some materials for supervision authorities then... " Send it where? To the forum? lol, SURE! Of cause I will ask you, guys, who are interested in the scam to continue.

Aren't you interested in fooling other people? So why are you trying to insult me in EVERY message, if you are calm and sure about facts, online poker is fair, you are sure it is, but you start to insult and discuss anything but not the materials... This behavior is pretty obvious even for those who are on your side ))

Lol, if you were smarter, you would choose totally different "strategy"!

Now let's read the answer of The UK Gambling Commission -

"From your email and attachments, it would appear that you are located overseas, Furthermore, Having checked our public register here, it appears that this gambling business Red Star Poker is not licensed with the commission.

If you have concerns that the website is operating illegally where you reside, we suggest that you report this matter to the relevant bodies within your jurisdiction.

I would like to reassure you due to the information you have provided I have passed your email and evidence to our intelligence team. It is their role to consider illegal activity and where necessary consider taking action."

The last phrase. What did they type this for? Can you explain?

"If you have concerns that the website is operating illegally where you reside, we suggest that you report this matter to the relevant bodies within your jurisdiction." - isn't it enough? Where is the logic.

Okay, you type - "show your delusion and very low level of thinking you employ regarding poker."

That's why you can't provide ANY concrete argument regarding my analysis. I mean, you say that i'm an idiot, but you are CLEVER, but you can't do a shit with my analysis, right? You simply can't open the file. You and Slugant can't even find raw data there...

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1rxftegOdgrHeEZBwbvUlQi5SNnhBLdnj/edit?usp=drive_link&ouid=106366561548744833761&rtpof=true&sd=true

Cmon, guys.
You rule! ))

"you do realise by the way that based on the position of the button we see when you post non consecutive hands, yeah?"

Because it's ILLUSTRATION my friend! ))

It's a screen shot. It's not a DATA. A full hands played history can be checked here -
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1HPf2urc3J_0GrXz0l0Kzv-1aOnADjtIw/view?usp=sharing

And I gave your the link, but you two can't work with the info...

"Instead you come up with a grand conspiracy." - Donjonnie... man. It's a primitive, usual fraud of an international company. Should we call a little puddle on your dinner table The Worldwide Flood!!! 😃
DJ, it's just a scam of some online-casino. Nothing more.

"you are not all there or at least dont seem to have an understanding of how the world works" - I can't believe you are serious 😃 Funny comment, really.

Slugant,
"tons of excel sheets without ever using raw data." - oh, really? I thought I uploaded all the materials but you can't open any. Well, some other guys managed to open few files it appeared to be easy 😉

We dont need to see a selection of hands you've uploaded. Your hands are online to check on sharkscope and smarthand and there is no denying that. They mined almost all of your hands and no matter what (microstakes) game you've played, you've lost at it. That proves you have no clue about poker. A few hands or screenshots from you doesnt affect his.

And when poker commissions email you back saying "It is their role to consider illegal activity and where necessary consider taking action" they are not adressing any rigging but only licensing/legality issues.

You need to start dealing with the fact that you are a very sub-par poker player, one that never structurally could beat the micros. And this data is out there for you to see as well? Why do you believe more in small selective samples instead of the total sample of your hands (in which you've lost at microstakes on stars, ipoker etc and at both tournaments and cash games.

Man, you kidding...

You posted 4K hands from Pokerstars and 4K hands from iPoker.

I answered many time, I never played micro according other aim then testing the software of the rooms to show that EVEN micros are rigged. I specially changed micro-limits to test it.

At the same time I won 3$ buy-in Spin&Go on Pokerstars -

I won 3, 3$-5, 5$ MTTs on Partypoker -

And I won 7$ MT SnGs on Pokerstars -

You started with saying that 4K cash hands is a comprehensive distance, and then, you suddenly say that my research is based on only (how many hands is it based on? You don't even know that!).

You can't even perform an easy analysis of my game play on Sharkscope. Man, are you sure you can talk about data, are you able to work with information?

You always talk about distance, but you don't even know, that variance analysis is based on

1. The event registered
2. The distance played

You can't compare pretty easy stuff.

If you get 30 AA hands in a row - it's is enough to close any room for rigging cause it's about 0.00 + 58 zeros + 1% probability of the case. But you do not understand that, you do not know how to assess the variance. You can only say "I know variance in poker" - the only level of discussion you are ready to keep.

Yes, exactly "small samples" can be a pure evidence of rigging the game if it shows -

Exactly, man.

The evidence of hands been played in iPoker -
https://drive.google.com/file/d/16d2YB55xykMvw1wBPtbrlT8hvqe5w1MB/view?usp=drive_link

The research with all the raw data on the first sheet -
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1vmy4rvwKd8ldly_IJ2yV9qp6kZXqCpot/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=106366561548744833761&rtpof=true&sd=true

Oh, I showed a little more than 8k cash game hands (I couldnt show more because thats all you played, all at 10nl mind you)

Here are your tournament results for ipoker again:

This is almost 7k tournaments at microstakes played with a loss, there is your sample size for you

You say "If I open several tables and start generate a high activity in the room I will IMMEDIATLY start to win too. And I tried that. But I don't wanna play like that."
The data shows you never tried it and you never won money

And everything you say about (raw) data just proves you know nothing about the subject. Raw data is not based on software like excel, raw data is being put into excel. And by raw data we mean a lump sum of your hands, and not just the one you pick out or import. And btw, you claim as well that data from your tracker is unuseful, why post so many HM screenshots???

Also, those screenshots in total arent even 1600 tournaments.
So good for you, over those 1600 tournaments you've won.
But guess what, over 7000 tournaments you've lost. I guess this is what you call distance🙂

Dont let small samples fool you into thinking you are not a terrible microstakes loser. And stop scamming people with those small samples. You are preying on the week of mind, like MRP, and when they say something you like you kiss their ass like crazy. Be careful when John starts asking for money. And seeing his lifetime results he needs the money real bad.

Guys, I provided a more understandable explanation regarding the dependency of iPoker's software - dealing of a flop according to the folded players hand (provocation of a player to play rigged postflop).

You can read it here on the forum -

https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showpost.php?p=58980160&postcount=93513

Slugant, man ))

I show several Holdem Manager 2 screens because you asked for my explanation data base of "Rooms let a play win after the first registration in the room / after a break in gaming".

I got those screens because my HM2 worked while I have been playing on Pokerstars and on Partypoker. But it didn't work on iPoker. In fact, I finally managed to download via iPoker's client program. If you wanna check any data I provided you can use my full hand history database -

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Z_3y2zqB_YHiwhKDIOONgBp0FtmKVND2/view?usp=drive_link

I hadn't got this before... And I didn't even think it was necessary, because I provided you VIDEO version of all the hands been played for the analysis.

Anyway, if you need it - you have it now.

The question regarding those 7K tournaments lost - is a huge question, how did a winning player of 7-10$ SnG limits managed to loose 0, 1$-0, 5$ micros on iPoker 😃 Yeah, good question, I agree, and I provided you EVERYTHING, to understand what is going on in iPoker.

I haven't published my communication with Gambling Supervision Authorities though... It's coming 😉

Your HM snippets are small samples, im sure you've once won a month, paisting as well.
The sample I show of you are way way larger that show that lifetime you are a loser at microstakes never even playing higher than micros.

You show HM2 screens because you can choose the period of data. Every raw unedited data (ie mined hands) show you losing on both pokerstars & ipoker and at both cash games & tournaments. You seem to suck at everything.

Also, If you won at Pokerstars and lose at ipoker. Why are you certain the RNG of ipoker is rigged against you and not that the RNG of pokerstars is rigged in favour of you 😉 Same logic, same reasoning, same lack of evidence

As if it wasnt funny enough that a lifetime microstakes loser (11k tournaments with a $1 avg buyin with a loss & 40k hands at 10nl with a -20bb/100 lossrate😃) starts a thread to tell everyone "how to play according to a software algorithm)...

He always mentions the russian forum has his back.. well one made it over to 2+2 and made clear what was already very clear, namely that John lies about completely everything.

Guys, it's important to understand that some people who earn money playing online trying to mislead other players once some "risky" information regarding online-poker pops up. They discuss my gaming level, ignore the information.

I don't think it's any important but you can read my answer to this here -
https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showpost.php?p=58989639&postcount=93557

At the moment online poker is full of people who support the fraud of several online-casinos while earning money due to a huge activity in the rooms.

As a result of a discussion regarding the situation in iPoker (Red Star Poker) on the biggest Russian poker forum Gypsy Team I prepare the final report with all the adjustments according to the arguments of forum members.

I literally proved that iPoker rigs poker games. You can read the report in the relevant thread of the forum -

https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showpost.php?p=58995918&postcount=93584

You havent proven anything, just like you havent proven there are people trying to mislead other players because of your info. If someone disagrees with you and proves you're wrong, it doesnt mean there is a secret hidden agenda out to get you. You just yell something weird and say its proven, it doesnt work that way. You are not James Bond. You are a lonely middle-aged man in Russia holding a grudge at online poker because you cannot beat it, even though in your own mind (and only there) you are a genius.

The only proof LITERALLY in this whole thread is 540k+ hands of you playing microstakes, and losing.
That says everything one should know about your gaming level and grasp on poker.

The fact that you keep on seeing yourself as an "expert level player" and that ALL poker sites are rigged also indicate that you live in many delusions.

To be fair, I don't remember that I said something, regarding "ALL" of the sites were rigged.

Would be nice if you pointed at least one disagreement with the material, but you haven't provided any!

so you think some sites aren’t rigged yet you chose to play half a million hands on the site where you think it’s rigged?