Moderation Questions
The last iteration of the moderation discussion thread was a complete disaster. Numerous attempts to keep it on topic fa
I’d need to be reminded of your thoughts on sandy hook in order to properly critique them. Why don’t you go ahead and tell us. No children died and their grieving parents are all faking fakers and paid actors.
Do you not understand the correlation?
Your views are cruel, delusional, and socially dangerous, and it’s a damning moral failure on your part. Holding and spreading these beliefs has always been associated with broader extremist or conspiratorial mindsets that almost always include bigoted elements. You may have heard of Alex Jones. Maybe he is your hero.
I’d need to be reminded of your thoughts on sandy hook in order to properly critique them. Why don’t you go ahead and tell us. No children died and their grieving parents are all faking fakers and paid actors.
Whatever you're doing I'm not going to play your game.
One discussion at a time. You can find my Sandy Hook posts if you need them so badly and you know what I think there
What you need to do is now make the argument that my views there make me a bigot
Only bigots believe in Sandy hook trutherism. Find me one who isn’t.
I understand why you’re reticent to share them now, as in almost all situations it has led to everyone refusing to associate with you.
I won’t ban you. Go ahead.
When you’re done you can tell us how ancestry is naziism. Concepts are whatever you make them!
Bonus points if you can find a sandy hook truther who isn’t a bigot. Extra bonus points if you can prove your columbine theory without posting an image of another posters dead friend.
Do you think that only bigots believe in conspiracy theories in general or is it just Sandy Hook that you think is special bigot ground?
I love the idea that he doesn't mind that you believe he thinks no kids died at sandy hook and the parents (who went through hell and are likely still grieving to this day) are liars, but by god you better not think that makes him a bigot. That is over the line.
Newsflash, df, if you believe that bs about sandy hook, calling you a bigot would be a compliment.
******* disgusting human being.
If you want just the basics then the whole story stinks.
school was probably closed in 2009 or 2010 due to asbestos. Lots of the images from that day (12/14/12) show the building in a very dilapidated condition.
The kids were supposedly just left at the scene and not transported to hospitals to be declared dead as would be standard in any real event.
Lots of very suspicious interviews especially with the coroner and some of the alleged parents.
I've probably forgotten more than I know now but they've written books on it.
So, what, you think that the funerals and the parents of the kids that died were all crisis actors? And they kept it up over the intervening decade plus?
I can’t fathom this theory making sense to anyone.
No tolerance for these fheads. Permanent ignore. Disgusting fools actually make my skin crawl they are so revolting.
So, what, you think that the funerals and the parents of the kids that died were all crisis actors? And they kept it up over the intervening decade plus?
I can’t fathom this theory making sense to anyone.
It makes more sense than thinking that 26 people were killed in 5 minutes and not a single one was taken to a hospital.
If you want just the basics then the whole story stinks. school was probably closed in 2009 or 2010 due to asbestos. Lots of the images from that day (12/14/12) show the building in a very dilapidated condition.The kids were supposedly just left at the scene and not transported to hospitals to be declared dead as would be standard in any real event. Lots of very suspicious int
“ Officials have said that 20 children were killed in the Friday morning attack. Eighteen children were pronounced dead at the school and two died were pronounced dead at a Danbury, Conn., hospital.”
At least two of them were taken to the hospital and declared dead then. You realize medical examiners also have the ability to pronounce time of death, right? You don’t have to take them to the hospital to do that.
Crime scenes are regularly left untouched until they can be photographed. All the bodies were removed by the next day.
JFC I just can't. "Not a single one was taken to a hospital." Besides the fact that some were taken to the hospital, you don't take dead people to the hospital you stupid ****.
Holy ****
Maybe if you don't know a single ******* thing about what you're talking about, try to err on the side of believing the parents that just had their children blown to pieces and their lives torn apart.
CHANCES ARE THEY AREN'T ******* LYING.
God these dfs make me angry.
And I wanna just be clear before you throw yourself into the abyss of public opinion, your claim that any emphasis on heritage is Naziism is a grotesque distortion of history. I’m shocked anyone would come even close to agreeing with you on that.
Nazis weaponized heritage to justify their racial supremacy and genocide. It doesn’t follow to then claim that anyone who values their culture or ancestry is a fascist. In every instance that I can think of, the people most concerned with heritage today are those whose identities were stolen or erased, like descendants of slaves or indigenous communities or refugees.
If your “logic” says that a black person desiring to reconnect with their African roots or a native person preserving their traditions or Jews after the Holocaust prioritizing their thousands of years old culture is akin to “third reich” behavior, you are actively engaging in racial gaslighting. It claims that any pride, memory, or cultural self-respect from a marginalized group is dangerous. You can throw that under the umbrella of your special snowflake skepticism but it’s very plainly and thinly veiled white supremacist thinking and 100% bigoted, the opposite of what you claim to be doing. Heritage is not the issue. Erasing it, mocking it, and equating it with fascism is.
You are not what you think you are, but you’re likely incapable of knowing any better either.
And I wanna just be clear before you throw yourself into the abyss of public opinion, your claim that any emphasis on heritage is Naziism is a grotesque distortion of history. I’m shocked anyone would come even close to agreeing with you on that.Nazis weaponized heritage to justify their racial supremacy and genocide. It doesn’t follow to then claim that anyone who values their
I never made the claim that people who value their culture are fascist. Valuing your culture or wanting to preserve some endangered language is fine.
Caring about your bloodlines, or ethnicity, or thinking that race is important is entering into Nazi territory. If you could represent my thoughts honestly it would help.
I never made the claim that people who value their culture are fascist. Valuing your culture or wanting to preserve some endangered language is fine.
Caring about your bloodlines, or ethnicity, or thinking that race is important is entering into Nazi territory. If you could represent my thoughts honestly it would help.
Those are your claims though, not mine. You perverted the argument to suit your accusations when I never mentioned bloodlines, ethnicity, or race. You claimed anyone who placed value in their heritage is a Nazi.
I claimed that identity, communal history, family narratives, culture, language, ancestry, homelands and knowing where one comes from are all important human aspects that have nothing to do with Nazi ideology. You lost your mind and claimed no identities were stolen (they literally took their names from them), and that caring about where one comes from is akin to being a Nazi. Not only is that wrong, it’s bigoted and morally reprehensible. You believe very shitty things, Dustin, and you’re reckless with your words and opinions. You always have been for the 15+ years I’ve known you.
Anyway, if you could represent my views honestly, that would help. Feel free to review my posts.
Back to your no children died schtick. It’s always very impressive.
It's always been my understanding that all of the bodies were left at the scene. I would have to look into the claim that two were moved.
It’s from an article dated the very next day, so that’s before anyone would have had the conspiracy theory that no bodies were moved. Your confidence should be very high that the article is genuine.
It’s from an article dated the very next day, so that’s before anyone would have had the conspiracy theory that no bodies were moved. Your confidence should be very high that the article is genuine.
Let me tell you about the time many years ago where Lb was insistent that columbine was a hoax and he was posting aerial photos of dead students, until another poster came forward and said he was there at columbine, the photo was of his dead friend, and she was very much real and very much dead. Somehow he evaded a ban for this.
Here we are years later, and he still claims columbine is a hoax.
Nothing you say will matter. Evidence means nothing to him. Don’t waste your time and righteous anger.
The history of the North America, and indeed most of human history (but especially North America which never really had any long lasting "peaceful" civilizations), is just a long unbroken chain of what you call genocide. And "native" in the way you use it is just the second to last group to control an area before someone with low melanin took over. Obviously liberal society t
yeah so much this
same in central and south america
i really don't like how it's framed of peaceful natives and evil greedy settlers
colonial america was violent and dangerous - so much that you literally can't find a single town in all of new england that wasn't raided or outright attacked at some point in its history
the reason for reservations etc etc was because it was an untenable situation and too dangerous to allow to continue as the status quo - this doesn't mean the colonists didn't do anything wrong along the way - but it was very much a push-pull dynamic going back and forth with one side winning and finding a permanent solution
likewise, if not a single slave was brought to america, the african slave trade would have still been quite robust without the USA at all as we only ever brought in a few hundred thousand vs the 10 million+ that went to the caribbean and brazil
even if the usa and caribbean islands and brazil weren't buying slaves - those same people would have still be enslaved and just sold elsewhere - maybe a few less would have been captured - but that industry was established long before there was a demand for them in the new world
it's often painted as if europeans decided they were going to be super racist and thus sailed to africa, captured some locals and then brought them to a plantation in alabama - instead it was rather "which of the many slave trade hubs do we want to procure our laborers?" and they chose the sub saharan largely because they survived longer in the climate of brazil and haiti than other ethnic groups
during that same time, there was also a robust sale of european slaves from the berbers - so much that the first military action the usa took as an independent nation was to fight them to put an end to it - but we didn't bring over the slaves from the berbers because the grabbing some irishmen and spaniards and tossing them in the rain forests of the amazon is a good way to lose them to malaria
in fact, an entire ethnicity of slavs were so associated with being slaves throughout their history that the word literally comes from that because it used to be interchangeable
and importantly, brazil, which had over 10x as many slaves as the usa - does not have any complex or anxiety at all about that history - it's in the past and now we play soccer and have fun
