The murder of Charlie Kirk
Can we all admit that the majority of extremism is coming from the left over the last handful of years?
Apparently they j
I'm not going to play ref here. Just stating what I've learned so far.
He was definitely raised conservative in the LDS church. There's supposedly videos of him playing piano in church. He got a scholarship to an LDS owned college, in BYU, but he went to utah state. He scored in the top 1% for his college entrance exams. He is not a registered Democrat.
Could he be playing rebellion games against how he was raised his whole life? Maybe. But the odds are increasingly unlikely. But we'll know more soon.
he was praying it was a Mexican or Arab
I'm not going to play ref here. Just stating what I've learned so far. He was definitely raised conservative in the LDS church. There's supposedly videos of him playing piano in church. He got a scholarship to an LDS owned college, in BYU. He scored in the top 1% for his college entrance exams. He is not a registered Democrat. Could he be playing rebellion games against how he
Germany's Baader-Meinhof terrorists of the 1970s tended to come from conventional middle-class backgrounds, as did the 9/11 'Hamburg cell' of Al-Qaeda. That's pretty much where people like that do come from.
Germany's Baader-Meinhof terrorists of the 1970s tended to come from conventional middle-class backgrounds, as did the 9/11 'Hamburg cell' of Al-Qaeda. That's pretty much where people like that do come from.
When you've been raised in a radicalized belief system, it's of course very easy to move to another radicalized belief system. Your mind is already trained to think this way.
I'm not looking to blame the right but it should be observed that Crooks and this guy were raised up as deeply right wing individuals who we are supposed to believe had a rapid and intense radicalization to the violent left
It raises questions for me
deeply rightwing individuals would have voted. The alleged assassin didn't vote in 2024 and 2022 from what i read. Given what and who was on the line in those 2 elections, no one actually interested in politics on the right would have stayed home (in 2022 in vote against covid horrors; in 2024 to vote for trump, the first non establishment actual rightwing etc etc).
So the idea is that he was raised *socially conservative*, very probably so, but not *politically engaged* which are 2 very different things
deeply rightwing individuals would have voted. The alleged assassin didn't vote in 2024 and 2022 from what i read. Given what and who was on the line in those 2 elections, no one actually interested in politics on the right would have stayed home (in 2022 in vote against covid horrors; in 2024 to vote for trump, the first non establishment actual rightwing etc etc).So the idea
Correct. There are already reports out from friend and family though, that he was increasingly becoming interested in politics.
I'm not going to play ref here. Just stating what I've learned so far. He was definitely raised conservative in the LDS church. There's supposedly videos of him playing piano in church. He got a scholarship to an LDS owned college, in BYU, but he went to utah state. He scored in the top 1% for his college entrance exams. He is not a registered Democrat. Could he be playing rebe
It seems like a lot of these political assassins are working under a kind of Archduke Ferdinand delusion. In their minds it becomes the spark that will somehow set off a sweeping political transformation and that theyβre the agent destined to make it happen.
These 4-Chan meme lord dudes - which apparently Crooks and this guy were - don’t fit neatly into the lefty/righty spectrum that us old heads insist upon.
It’s some weird mix of ultra online/desire to be edgy/seeing nothing but extremes for their entire lives.
Just think about how ****ed in the head you have to be to kill someone and your priority is to make sure you scrawl some sick memes that literally 2% of the population has any idea what they are on the bullets.
It’s worthless to try to “prove” he’s left or right.
Please can someone explain the apparently anti gay inscription if he was a leftist? Serious question.
the was an actual rightwing nativist killer who hated latinos A LOT some years ago that wrote a manifesto that was super pro union.
People don't necessarily map over all right-left distinctions as neatly as purists do
These 4-Chan meme lord dudes - which apparently Crooks and this guy were - donβt fit neatly into the lefty/righty spectrum that us old heads insist upon. Itβs some weird mix of ultra online/desire to be edgy/seeing nothing but extremes for their entire lives. Just think about how ****ed in the head you have to be to kill someone and your priority is to make sure you scrawl some
It's worth it, if we can, to understand which narratives he bought in that made him think killing Kirk was a worthwhile use of his own life. Unless he was "going after fame" generically ("i should kill a famous person") but i don't think that's particularly common these days
The Klein piece can be understood easier if instead of "correct" you substitute "effective way to pursue his goals".
It's not a moral claim AT ALL. It's a technical claim of efficacy. You guys know it, but you can't have a shred of decency ever so you have to make a big fuss of a word that is UNAMBIGOUS in that context given the article, but you want to insist is ambigous.
It seems like a lot of these political assassins are working under a kind of Archduke Ferdinand delusion. In their minds it becomes the spark that will somehow set off a sweeping political transformation and that theyβre the agent destined to make it happen.
a lot of the right-wing griftoverse who are perma-horny for a violent civil war talk like this, but a lot of these recent shooters are far-right edgelord freaks; racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic, antisemitic, etc nihilists. and the fact that they all seem to worship other mass shooters should mean that they know that the archduke ferdinand thing probably isn't happening. but who knows, maybe they're dumb, or think it's building toward that, idk.
after jan6 , lockdowns and vax mandates, those 2 elections, with trump almost assassinated being the candidate? it is.
Leftwing people could have many reasons not to vote (especially very leftist people) but rightwing people? lol if you believe just 20% of the rightwing narrative it was the last chance to save the country from leftist genocide and infinite immigration to substitute you and your family violently etc etc.
You cannot be politically active and rightwing in the USA in 2024 and not scream to vote as the most important thing you could ever do to try to save the country from domestic enemies. That was the MAIN NARRATIVE. You wouldn't have been rightwing if you didn't agree with that basically.
I donβt have the energy to explain in any eloquent way how two opposing things can be true at once
I understand that. Vic posted an image of an NYT opinion piece, you asked what he was upset about, I'm explaining that he's probably upset about a paper of record whitewashing the politics of a deranged bigot.
a lot of the right-wing griftoverse who are perma-horny for a violent civil war talk like this, but a lot of these recent shooters are far-right edgelord freaks; racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic, antisemitic, etc nihilists. and the fact that they all seem to worship other mass shooters should mean that they know that the archduke ferdinand thing probably isn't happening.
Right-wing dipshits have had fantasies about a nationwide right vs left civil war since the 60's and possibly earlier. Supposedly this was what motivated the Manson killings.
You cannot be politically active and rightwing in the USA in 2024 and not scream to vote as the most important thing you could ever do to try to save the country from domestic enemies. That was the MAIN NARRATIVE. You wouldn't have been rightwing if you didn't agree with that basically.
Continually redefining terms to fit your current narrative is pretty weak sauce. But, you do you.
Anyone notice how the right is in an absolute uproar about this but doesn't give a **** every time a bunch of children get shot up at school?
It's worth it, if we can, to understand which narratives he bought in that made him think killing Kirk was a worthwhile use of his own life. Unless he was "going after fame" generically ("i should kill a famous person") but i don't think that's particularly common these days
Dude you donβt want understanding. You just want to be βcorrectβ and use it as an excuse to bludgeon the other side to death.