President Donald Trump
I assume it's still acceptable to have a Trump thread in a Politics forum?
So this is an obvious lie - basically aimed at
Need to appoint Middle Eastern expert, Jared Kushner, as new Supreme Leader. He'll soon sort any mess out.
But the libs aren't outraged. Zionists control both parties. The Democrats will probably (don't ask me to actually ingest their reaction) criticize the way Trump is doing it without criticizing that he is doing it. This is probably the width of debate allowed to Democrats by their Zionist masters, enough to create some appearance of opposition without fundamentally challenging
I took your question to mean maga supporters or voters.
Seems like you are describing democrat politicians. I think a decent amount of Dem voters are pissed off with this new middle east adventure. So that makes maga happy and their guy may not be sticking by his campaign promises but he's coming through on the most important thing of all. Owning the libs
direct quote "we dance on the streets because in our home country it is illegal" who cares if there are some Iranian loyalists. the ones in free country's not under the yoke are the only ones with a correct perspective. Obviously we can't know the perspective of a country with an internet blackout. but maybe you should ask why the internet is blacked out?
Do you think the citizens of Iran are going to pickup pitchforks and take to the streets to overthrow the govt or the current govt stays in power and their life is about to get worse? What odds would you give it?
If America isn't going to go all the way and topple the regime, they're just making the normal Iranian's lives worse and raising prices for the rest of the world.
Awesome plan
I mean that is the plan. 20k+ died last month they have way more spine then americans I wouldn't bet against it. I doubt the regime can fight two fronts. Iran has no air defenses left and caused zero casualties in their counter attacks.
Pretty much what happened was iran was exposed as a paper tiger in the last war and America realized they could easily defeat them. The only reason they waited 10 months to finish them was because Israel wanted to restock on aa ammunition to reduce casualties
zero casualties?
Is that a good plan in your opinion? Sounds like a pretty shitty plan to me unless a failed state and bloody civil war is your goal.
I guess the next step if Iran continues to fund proxies is just glass the place. I mean damn, you guys had your chance served up on a silver platter, we're out of options...
MAGA Melania, the champion of education, tolerance, and global peace!
Melania Trump is set to lead a session of the United Nations security council on Monday, coinciding with the US assuming the body’s rotating monthly presidency, the White House announced.
According to a statement, first cited by CNN, the first lady plans to spotlight education as a tool for fostering tolerance and promoting global peace at the global body, which has its headquarters in New York.
There's been American casualties? i think there's no alternative I personally want boots on the ground because for every American solider that will die probably 1000 Iranian will die in their place but unfortunately I don't think that's an option as your politics seem unwilling so that only leaves the option of bombing them while they do it themselves
There's been American casualties? i think there's no alternative I personally want boots on the ground because for every American solider that will die probably 1000 Iranian will die in their place but unfortunately I don't think that's an option as your politics seem unwilling so that only leaves the option of bombing them while they do it themselves
The canadian MAGA, one of a kind wonder of this world and as ignorant and informed as its counterpart.
? 3 dead wow! last time i checked there was none. thats the best they can do in the opening salvos . also lol at calling me maga. your country created that regard plz dont bring me into that drama. everything is about trump with you guys. were talking about a super important conflict in a trump thread ffs. I try to avoid everything about him but its all you guys talk about
? 3 dead wow! last time i checked there was none. thats the best they can do in the opening salvos . also lol at calling me maga. your country created that regard plz dont bring me into that drama. everything is about trump with you guys. were talking about a super important conflict in a trump thread ffs. I try to avoid everything about him but its all you guys talk about
He's the guy that decided to start this war. It wasn't like there was some imminent threat to America from Iran, so who else should be the focal point?
You think one guy decides everything? that's cute. The dems would have attacked Iran too after Israel probed them and showed they had no defenses or offensive capability's. Believe it or not the people in charge advising leaders are generally the adults in the room. Your generals are the same after every election
direct quote "we dance on the streets because in our home country it is illegal" who cares if there are some Iranian loyalists. the ones in free country's not under the yoke are the only ones with a correct perspective. Obviously we can't know the perspective of a country with an internet blackout. but maybe you should ask why the internet is blacked out?
Lol? I imagine that's a pretty big concern for the US military.
You think one guy decides everything? that's cute. The dems would have attacked Iran too after Israel probed them and showed they had no defenses or offensive capability's. Believe it or not the people in charge advising leaders are generally the adults in the room. Your generals are the same after every election
Hey dumbshit:
In the modern world, we crave immediate verdicts on everything, including military action. But in cases where the long term-goal is some vague notion of durable regime change, the final assessment of whether the goal has been achieved doesn't come in for years or at least many months after the most intense military action because it takes a while for the new political reality to stabilize. Given the U.S.'s terrible record of failing to achieve its long term goals in these situations, I am not at all hopeful.
dEmS wOuLdA dOnE tHiS tOo
Source: trust me bro
Pretty much what happened was iran was exposed as a paper tiger in the last war and America realized they could easily defeat them.
Whether the U.S. could smash Iran militarily has never been the issue. That has always been the easy part. The human cost of the smashing, and our historical inability to engineer a durable situation in the aftermath that justifies that cost, are why American military action very often is judged harshly by history.
considering the number of military bases on fire all over the Middle East, I think the verdict is still out on if the US can smash the Iranian military. they are pretty good at slaughtering schoolchidren though.
You think one guy decides everything? that's cute. The dems would have attacked Iran too after Israel probed them and showed they had no defenses or offensive capability's. Believe it or not the people in charge advising leaders are generally the adults in the room. Your generals are the same after every election
Haha no, the president doesn't get to skate on the responsibility of a preemptive attack on a country.
considering the number of military bases on fire all over the Middle East, I think the verdict is still out on if the US can smash the Iranian military.
Nah. It's always been obvious, especially if the U.S. was willing to bring the level of commitment it brought to the second Gulf War. But military smashing of course isn't a legitimate goal in and of itself, as the second Gulf War proved.
well its not going very well for them at the moment.
shatty monster
Meanwhile, Iran will try to do what it always does: Put pressure on the Hormuz strait
they have already done a lot more than that.
