USA Goes to War Against Iran
USA Goes to War Against Iran
8
zs

USA Goes to War Against Iran

Time for a dedicated thread to the war.

How long will it last and what will be the probable outcome?

02 March 2026 at 06:37 PM
Reply...

5340 Replies

8
zs


by Bill Haywood m

You mean they might commit genocide like in Gaza? There's absolutely no precedent for Iran doing that.They have a big and effective army, they fought off Saddam. They haven't invaded ANYBODY.Their assistance to Hezbollah is to maintain a deterrent against the terrorist rogue state of Israel.You should be more worried about what your own country will do in the future. Bomb more

Iran used to have a big effective army. Not no more. The teaming up of the US and Israel is the greatest fighting force the world has ever seen. They are correct to be providing the knock out blow to this weakened evil Iranian regime. If Iran had nuclear weapons there is a pretty good chance they would attempt to genocide Israel. I guess we will never know now.


by Elway m

Iran used to have a big effective army. Not no more. The teaming up of the US and Israel is the greatest fighting force the world has ever seen. They are correct to be providing the knock out blow to this weakened evil Iranian regime. If Iran had nuclear weapons there is a pretty good chance they would attempt to genocide Israel. I guess we will never know now.

If nukes is your issue, then the Iranian program was very effectively controlled under the Obama program. Bombing their school children just proves to Iran how much they need a nuclear deterrent. Nobody does this **** to North Korea.

Your 2003 invasion of Iraq is responsible for a million deaths. Now Israel is conducting actual genocide in Gaza. You are blood dripping monsters. You are the rogue terrorist nations by many degrees of magnitude.


by Bill Haywood m

If nukes is your issue, then the Iranian program was very effectively controlled under the Obama program. Bombing their school children just proves to Iran how much they need a nuclear deterrent. Nobody does this **** to North Korea.Your 2003 invasion of Iraq is responsible for a million deaths. Now Israel is conducting actual genocide in Gaza. You are blood dripping monsters.

I suspect North Korea would never have nukes if Trump was President at the time.


by Elway m

I suspect North Korea would never have nukes if Trump was President at the time.

This fantasy does nothing to deny that Iran's nuclear program was once effectively contained.


by John21 m

It doesn't really matter. That they're non-military means someone needs to explain why they got hit.

actually health infrastructure could be military its a pretty broad term. That's why im roasting someone for using it interchangeably with hospital


by checkraisdraw m

What are the actual details of the hospital/medical site attacks? Where they actual bombings like the case of the school or were they just hit by shrapnel/in the vicinity of a bombing?

just look at the satelite photos posted above your post.... that should explain it for dummies


by Bill Haywood m

This fantasy does nothing to deny that Iran's nuclear program was once effectively contained.

Destroying Irans nuclear capabilities forever is much better than β€œcontainment”. Many nations have fallen for this until it was too late. Just ask the Brits how this worked with the Nazi’s. Passivity is a great way to get run over.


by Bill Haywood m

Iran hasn't invaded anybody for three hundred years. What's the score for your team?

AI:

if were being honest that has more to do with capabilities the ottomans then the British then America pretty much kept them in line by force. We can see they support terrorism because they don't have the power for direct action. Its not out of the goodness of their heart. study some history


by MoViN.tArGeT m

actually health infrastructure could be military its a pretty broad term. That's why im roasting someone for using it interchangeably with hospital

idk what you’re hallucinating but I don’t see any satellite photos above the post you just responded to, let alone ones that have to do with the question I had.


This operation has gone extremely smooth so far. I’m hearing many Iranian soldiers are laying down their arms. They are throwing away their cell phones so their commanders think they are dead.

What scares me is I have heard the Israelis are talking about this being their opportunity to build the third temple. From my research it seems likely the Temple Mount rightfully belongs to them. This is based off archeological findings from the sight. I would imagine the Islamic world would not like this. On the other hand what could they do about it?


by Elway m

This operation has gone extremely smooth so far. I’m hearing many Iranian soldiers are laying down their arms. They are throwing away their cell phones so their commanders think they are dead. What scares me is I have heard the Israelis are talking about this being their opportunity to build the third temple. From my research it seems likely the Temple Mount rightfully belongs

The heifers from 2 years ago have expired and I don't think they've found suitable replacements yet. They could still knock down al asqa I guess in anticipation.


by Bill Haywood m

This fantasy does nothing to deny that Iran's nuclear program was once effectively contained.

But they have a major hard on for Israel, that wasn't going to stop.


by Bill Haywood m

This fantasy does nothing to deny that Iran's nuclear program was once effectively contained.

Then why didn't they keep it contained at Obama's levels?

In other words, leaving aside the $100B they spent on their nuclear program since Obama, why did they incur close to $1T in sanctions?

For their defense? Well what pursuing a nuke cost Iran is roughly 20x the entire Ukrainian military modernization effort since Crimea, or 15+ years of Ukraine's current level of wartime spending, or twice what Israel has spent over the last 20 years creating one of the most technologically advanced militaries in the world.


by John21 m

Then why didn't they keep it contained at Obama's levels?

In other words, leaving aside the $100B they spent on their nuclear program since Obama, why did they incur close to $1T in sanctions?

rofl seriously? trump reneged on the deal in his first term and reimposed sanctions


by John21 m

Then why didn't they keep it contained at Obama's levels?

Because Cheato Ghoul canceled the agreement.

Destroying Irans nuclear capabilities forever is much better than β€œcontainment”.

You can't destroy it forever.


John21 fighting for his LIFE itt


by Bill Haywood m

Because Cheato Ghoul canceled the agreement.

After they rejected his terms, which they could have accepted if all they wanted was energy or even dropped the nuclear program all together.... and my point still stands: were it not for their obsession with getting a nuke they could've had a conventional military to rival Israel's.


new antisemitism just dropped from the WSJ



by checkraisdraw m

idk what you’re hallucinating but I don’t see any satellite photos above the post you just responded to, let alone ones that have to do with the question I had.

it was like 20 posts before just google it. it shows the school is surrounded by military facility's for the "they did it on purpose" crew


by John21 m

After they rejected his terms, which they could have accepted if all they wanted was energy or even dropped the nuclear program all together.... and my point still stands: were it not for their obsession with getting a nuke they could've had a conventional military to rival Israel's.

The program was halted, with verification. Trumps demands were designed to be rejected.

And it takes real chutzpah for countries with thousands of nukes to say Iran has an obsession.


After the Iranian president apologised to the Gulf states and pledged to stop attacking them, the IRGC went on attacking them. Slight singing-from-different-hymnbooks problem.

US heavy bombers are now arriving at Fairford and Diego Garcia, so their sortie rates to Iran can be stepped up.


by Elway m

I suspect North Korea would never have nukes if Trump was President at the time.

They developed ICBMs unabated during his first term. His actions in the middle east directly lead to Iran developing enriched uranium. If his goal was to prevent hostile regimes from getting nukes he clearly doesn;t know what he's doing.....which makes complete sense for anyone who's heard him tr yto talk about anything over the last 10+ years.


"Iran retaliated with missile and drone bombardments against U.S. bases and allied territory, targeting military facilities across the Gulf, including Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar. One Iranian drone killed six American service members at a U.S. command center in Kuwait. Asked whether Americans should be worried about retaliatory attacks at home, Trump acknowledges the possibility.

‘I guess,’ he says. ‘But I think they’re worried about that all the time. We think about it all the time. We plan for it. But yeah, you know, we expect some things. Like I said, some people will die. When you go to war, some people will die.’"


by Bill Haywood m

The program was halted, with verification. Trumps demands were designed to be rejected.

And it takes real chutzpah for countries with thousands of nukes to say Iran has an obsession.

Radical Islamists should never have nukes. The US has nukes for deterrence purposes. Iran simply could never be trusted to only use the nukes for deterrence. They have openly stated they want to wipe Israel off the map. They constantly chant β€œDeath to the USA”. They are the number one state sponsor of terrorism.

I hope you can understand the difference here.



Reply...