Lodge Card Club Raided / Grand Jury does not indict any Lodge employees
Came looking for some info on this, but I guess I will kick the thread off. Anyone there at the time or know more detail
imnot taking sidesbut if i did id be taking dougs sidedoug knows how fast a reputation can be ruined onlineanything dodgy i believe doug didnt knowOn the other hand with tom Dwan this guy has pounced and i cant wait to see what doug got in store for him now
Stop ****in saying hes a good guy, hes not a good guy.For 10+ he basically ran fox news for poker/crypto being a bully, hyp
He always played orc when I played him
Same flavor as the FTP debacle.Unfortunate for all involved. I hope it was just some players and the owners were unaware. If they were aware and either helped facilitate it or simply turned a blind eye, will the poker world treat them like pariahs ala Ferguson and Lederer or show a little more grace and forgiveness It'll be interesting since those impacted will be far fewer and
If polk pays out it's nothing like FT.
And shady **** goes on in every poker room in the country.
If some people were laundering money and everyone gets payed out even if the room is closed it's nothing like Lederer and Ferguson.
You seriously think most poker players give a **** about people laundering money?
I think it depends on what the circumstances are. If Doug knowingly assisted in money laundering, yes, I think most people would care and it would tarnish/ruin his reputation.
And yes, if he is involved and people lose money as a result of the bust without being made right (hard to do if your finances are seized by the government and youβre locked behind bars, regardless of whatever assurance posted on X), I think people would care to the point of giving him pariah status.
And imagine the backlash if stuff trickles down on Brad or Andrew. Theyβre far less polarizing figures than Doug and IF he was involved and they get rolled for it as part owners, people REALLY wonβt appreciate that.
I mean, criminal activity may not be a big deal in your book but if it was happening and he was involved, it would certainly tarnish his reputation in my eyes. And I guarantee Iβm not alone with that.
lol pariah in poker let's get serious for a moment
even if Doug gets arrested, convicted, spends 2 years in a federal camp and stiffs every customer in sight, the house will be packed during the grand reopening with the 10 ft "Welcome back Doug" banner hanging from the rafters
lol pariah in poker let's get serious for a moment
even if Doug gets arrested, convicted, spends 2 years in a federal camp and stiffs every customer in sight, the house will be packed during the grand reopening with the 10 ft "Welcome back Doug" banner hanging from the rafters
Ok, why?
Letβs hypothetically, and I by no means am accusing him of anything, but letβs suppose hypothetically he βstiffs every customer in sightβ and serves two years, why would he be welcomed back but Ferguson and Lederer were not?
Whatβs the difference there other than the volume of players impacted by shenanigans?
no one is rolling out a red carpet for Ferguson and Lederer but to my knowledge they are not banned from WSOP and simply choose not to show up, people are still riding Ivey's nuts even though he was just as complicit as them in what happened at FTP
there are numerous threads about scammers in this very section, pretty much all of them continue to play unimpeded sans some infrequent 10-30 sec interactions with aggrieved parties
there are maybe 5 people in the entire world who can potentially be considered poker pariahs, it's not really a thing
cliffs: no one cares
I think it depends on what the circumstances are. If Doug knowingly assisted in money laundering, yes, I think most people would care and it would tarnish/ruin his reputation.And yes, if he is involved and people lose money as a result of the bust without being made right (hard to do if your finances are seized by the government and you're locked behind bars, regardless of what
Obviously if people aren't made whole it's like the FTP scandal. If Doug pays everyone then it's not even close.
This is going to shock you but every single casino in the country and every single poker room that has meaningful stakes has people laundering money. It's also going to shock you that tons of poker players either don't pay their taxes properly or play in illegal home games. But yea they care if some whales launder money dumping through poker lmao.
Are you alone? Probably not. But you'd be in the extreme minority. As long as everyone gets paid out his reputation is going to be fine. That's the most important thing in the gambling world.
So is Doug more like Walter White or Jesse Pinkman?
It sounds like weβre in agreement if he pays. You just sound like youβre far more convinced he will than I am (again, assuming something happened, he was involved, and he needs to pay people back).
I think his reputation will still be tarnished, but not made to be a pariah, if thats the case.
well in that case I need a definition of community support from you
do I think his tweets will receive fewer likes if he doesn't make everyone whole? maybe
does he lose a potential invite or two to some stream or a private game? probably
is his poker room business going to be affected in any meaningful way? absolutely not
plenty of people aren't huge fans of Doug already, me included - a few more thousand people not liking Doug isn't going to change much in the grand scheme of things
in any case we're participating in a largely pointless theoretical discussion since whatever amount of money is involved here is a drop in a bucket for him
Any chance this is related to Rampage and the clubs he was running on the apps a few years ago?
One shady character in the operation to bring it all tumbling down. SM.
Any chance this is related to Rampage and the clubs he was running on the apps a few years ago?
I doubt it. Rampage didn't invest until early 2025 as far as I can tell, and Splash Squad was years before his involvement with The Lodge. And I don't think Rampage has been all that active/involved on-site either.
It sounds like we're in agreement if he pays. You just sound like you're far more convinced he will than I am (again, assuming something happened, he was involved, and he needs to pay people back).I think his reputation will still be tarnished, but not made to be a pariah, if thats the case.I think we define what it means to be a pariah differently. I don't mean that he would b
If he pays he isn't losing any support. If he doesn't then his name is mud.
It is Texas where the government loves telling you what you can and can’t do. Despite thinking they’re living the American dream, Texans have less personal liberties than other Americans.
Seems like Doug is handling this as best as he can and if it comes out that the issue wasn’t directly related to him I doubt his reputation gets tarnished much.
Feel free to stop by our site:
v i c t o r y p i c k s . e u
Today on the site, you'll find one of the greatest fixes ever – the kind you could bet your house on. I can't share sensitive details here, which is why the site is password-protected. The temporary password to log in to the premium zone is: Langeo
"Beyond the statistics and trends, there is a darker, more complex factor that must be acknowledged. Information circulating in the betting underworld of Cleveland suggests this game may be viewed as an "opportunity" by certain parties.
According to a source—a former employee of a legal Cleveland casino who maintains contacts with investment groups interested in "alternative sports betting markets"—a significant amount of "smart money" has been placed on the Over 158.5 for this specific matchup. This source claims that a group with deep ties to Northern Ohio placed well over a million dollars on the Over, broken down into hundreds of smaller bets across legal sportsbooks in Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Michigan to avoid detection.
The source's information is fragmentary, pieced together from conversations within this milieu, but points to a few key observations:
The Trigger: The real interest from this group began immediately after UMass's stunning upset of Miami (OH) . Until that moment, UMass was not on their radar. But that win opened up the bracket and created a perceived "opportunity" for the quarterfinal matchup with Toledo. The bets were placed quickly, reacting to the new landscape.
The Focus: Leroy Blyden Jr. According to the source, whispers in betting circles ..."
More information after logging in.
Just dropped an analysis for today's NHL matchup.
Exactly, there's much lower hanging fruit to go after if they were just looking to "shut down poker rooms for poker". Everything would indicate this is what the state believes to be a legit money laundering charge against someone involved with the Lodge and has nothing to do with poker other than this is the avenue in which it's occurringAlso interestingly The Lodge in San Ant
Not saying this is the intent but very good reasons to go after Lodge. If TABC shuts down largest room that is one of the cleaner ones and it sticks, what do you think happens in those smaller and def illegal rooms?
Maybe very publically they want to establish the true social club seat fee model is fine but pot raking isnβt.
Still leaves the challenges for legal tournament poker
Another reason to go after the biggest. What if it truly is just money laundering but no house involvement. A reputable room would also be following CTR and SAR regs. So if players were laundering, wo house involvement, big clean rooms are the best targets.
Not saying this is the intent but very good reasons to go after Lodge. If TABC shuts down largest room that is one of the cleaner ones and it sticks, what do you think happens in those smaller and def illegal rooms?Maybe very publically they want to establish the true social club seat fee model is fine but pot raking isnβt. Still leaves the challenges for legal tournament poker
That seems like literally the worst method of operations for TABC and I would highly highly doubt it. Why would you take the hardest case on possible to win in court vs being able to roll into multiple rooms, confiscate everything, know you're gonna win 100% and be able to keep 100% of the money
Even the customers in the illegal places would have no real recourse to get their money back as they're participating in clearly illegal gambling games
Also if you're running an illegal room it's not like you will just shut down bc they hit The Lodge, you just might change locations or go more underground or figure it's the risk of doing business for as long as you can. The illegal rooms already are aware they're running completely illegal games and at the most risk
You take on the biggest cleanest to deter any more of them opening (even if charges donβt stick), state probably doesnβt worry about small more illegal operations as they sputter out quickly. Knowing big money people, if laundering, are not going to risk a bunch of money in a room that doesnβt have that kind of action flowing.
As someone who is familiar with CTR/Title31, this is 100% going to come down to paperwork that was probably being done for the big games streamed and off stream. If you canβt tell who was moving around illegal money in those streamed games then you donβt have much real life poker experience.
I doubt it. Rampage didn't invest until early 2025 as far as I can tell, and Splash Squad was years before his involvement with The Lodge. And I don't think Rampage has been all that active/involved on-site either.
This would actually be a textbook example of laundering illegal funds. Drug money doesn't stop being drug money because its a couple of years old
I have serious doubts this has anything to do with Rampage though
https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/29/ne...
I asked questions about Doug's AML compliance practices years ago...

4 years later, I guess I am vindicated. I hope everyone gets their money back.
This is exactly what I was afraid of... and why I stayed away from these rooms.