[extracted] New(?) 9-11 stuff

[extracted] New(?) 9-11 stuff

KSM got a plea deal. The guy who supposedly masterminded the 9/11 attacks is not getting the death penalty.

If you still

01 August 2024 at 05:08 PM
Reply...

6212 Replies


Earlier posts are available on our legacy forum HERE

by 57 On Red

You engage in a lot of projection on that topic.No, you were talking about Sea Sparrow, which is surface-to-air. (The original version was a derivative of the air-to-air AIM-7 Sparrow, which armed Phantom fighters from the 1960s.) Its purpose is to intercept anti-ship missiles.No, 35 miles is the theoretical maximum (not minimum) range of the missile, depending on flight trajec

Surface to air AND surface to surface. What did I tell you, hand wave incoming and there it is. It is your ignorance or lying.

"Low flying ships" they have now?

Unfortunately the hip tech heads are not forthcoming to fix the broken links. Probably the stuff is that old even the manuals are defunct. The NSSM block 1 has been going since early 2000.

The 35 mile range is a minimum.

Sent from this phone.

Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk


Good old trusty wikipedia. Who needs the tech heads.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RIM-162_ES...

https://www.navy.mil/Resources/Fact-File...

"General Characteristics
Primary Function: Surface-To-Air and Surface-To-Surface radar-guided missile."

"Semi active radar homing for block 1"

"SARH missiles require tracking radar to acquire the target, and a more narrowly focused illuminator radar to "light up" the target in order for the missile to lock on to the radar return reflected off target. The target must remain illuminated for the entire duration of the missile's flight."

It's conclusive. Either Raytheon been ripping off the yanks (ofc they have but that's beside the point) and this stuff does not work or Earth is flat.


Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk


by 1&onlybillyshears

Surface to air AND surface to surface. What did I tell you, hand wave incoming and there it is. It is your ignorance or lying."Low flying ships" they have now?Unfortunately the hip tech heads are not forthcoming to fix the broken links. Probably the stuff is that old even the manuals are defunct. The NSSM block 1 has been going since early 2000.The 35 mile range is a minimum.Se

No. I'm afraid your wishful (and frantic) googling has misled you, due to your lack of basic background knowledge and your inability to interpret what you read when it doesn't suit your delusions.

And the reason why the US Navy has operated the Hawkeye AEW ( Airborne Early Warning) aircraft for 60-odd years is that airborne radar can see further round the curve of the Earth than shipborne radar.


by 1&onlybillyshears

Good old trusty wikipedia. Who needs the tech heads.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RIM-162_ES...https://www.navy.mil/Resources/Fact-File..."General CharacteristicsPrimary Function: Surface-To-Air and Surface-To-Surface radar-guided missile.""Semi active radar homing for block 1""SARH missiles requir

In fact they state the range is "classified". Look carefully.

So the 35 miles stated is way under the range.

Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk


by 57 On Red

No. I'm afraid your wishful (and frantic) googling has misled you, due to your lack of basic background knowledge and your inability to interpret what you read when it doesn't suit your delusions. And the reason why the US Navy has operated the Hawkeye AEW ( Airborne Early Warning) aircraft for 60-odd years is that airborne radar can see further round the curve of the Earth tha

"Surface to surface" they say.

Yo, hear? Surface. The surface to the surface.

From

The

Surface

To

The

Surface.

That is what they say. Surface to surface.

"Ohhhhhh you mean surface to air"?

Nooooooooo! I mean surface to surface. What they said. Surface to surface. The missiles are launched from surface to surface.

Hope that helps.

Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk


Billy, when you read your contributions here in total do they stand out as a well thought out explanations of your views and the reasons you have adopted these views or does it read like a bunch of chimps have broken into your room while you were in group and have been pounding on your keyboard?


by d2_e4

Quite easily: so-called scientists are correct about what Michelson-Morley demonstrates, batshit insane internet cretin is wrong.

Add 'proof' to the ever-growing list of words that Billy doesn't know the meaning of.


There is a (very) old Russian joke:

Telegram arrives from base to HQ: "Thank you for the surface to air missiles. They hit the target excellently. With the next batch, please send some surface to airplane missiles".


by jjjou812

Billy, when you read your contributions here

Ah, I think this might be where you went wrong with some hidden assumptions.


by d2_e4

Ah, I think this might be where you went wrong with some hidden assumptions.

Billy contributes to this thread in the same sense that drug addiction contributes to homelessness.


by geezerchess

Billy contributes to this thread in the same sense that drug addiction contributes to homelessness.

I meant there is zero percent chance he re-reads his own posts.


by d2_e4

Ah, I think this might be where you went wrong with some hidden assumptions.

Point to d2.


Well that is rather cheeky of y'all but understandable.

Confronted with the hard evidence above proving

1. Earth is flat.
2. Earth is stationary.

You are best to ignore it. Shoot the messenger. Play pigeon chess.

Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk


Apparently Billy has left the building.


I think he thinks he won?


He also thinks the Earth is flat.


Billy is certainly the most talented flat earther on 2+2. I dont see him stumbling over the differences between metal and steel when talking building schematics.


by formula72

Billy is certainly the most talented flat earther on 2+2. I dont see him stumbling over the differences between metal and steel when talking building schematics.

On the other hand he did stumble over the maximum and minimum ranges of a well-known missile system, purporting to mistake one for the other in order to 'prove' his fictitious point.


by 57 On Red

On the other hand he did stumble over the maximum and minimum ranges of a well-known missile system, purporting to mistake one for the other in order to 'prove' his fictitious point.

What are the maximum and minimum ranges of the sea sparrow?

To be clear I am saying that 35 miles is a minimum and the max range is classified.

35 miles alone disproves Earth curve.


Oh and

SURFACE TO SURFACE. They said this.


by 57 On Red

On the other hand he did stumble over the maximum and minimum ranges of a well-known missile system, purporting to mistake one for the other in order to 'prove' his fictitious point.

And again thinks the Earth is flat


Maybe he just walked too far......


by 1&onlybillyshears

What are the maximum and minimum ranges of the sea sparrow?

To be clear I am saying that 35 miles is a minimum and the max range is classified.

35 miles alone disproves Earth curve.

That really doesn't mean that much. They classified performance details of the F-14 when it was in use, but it wasn’t a secret what it was generally capable of. The ESSM likely isn’t doing anything beyond what’s documented either, it's just classified because it's still active and is standard military practice.


What's the minimum range of a missile? Why can't I just fire it at something point blank?


by formula72

That really doesn't mean that much. They classified performance details of the F-14 when it was in use, but it wasn’t a secret what it was generally capable of. The ESSM likely isn’t doing anything beyond what’s documented either, it's just classified because it's still active and is standard military practice.

Ok.

35 miles surface to surface disproves Earth curve.

The only person to address this is 57 on red who lies about surface to surface capability.

Reply...