Wavelength Team A vs Team D

This is a good memory so it's 12+

I have no idea how to clue for the middle.

"I had breakfast" is maybe an 11.

On the spectrum it goes:

Pizza yesterday-pizza last week-pizza last year....

Remembering you had good pizza last week isn't particularly noteworthy, that being said I'm having a tough time remembering yummy meals I had last week.

Given the small box we're in, I'm probably on higher for the range, but that box might be equally small. We're talking 12-13 vs 14-15 maybe with a slice of 16.

God dammit I just typed all that up while taking my morning dump

plunger?

nice one guys!

btw that George Pickens gif

reminds me that when he was in college he made one the best plays i've seen in football

I worked at a pizza restaurant for 11 years. Had a slice of pizza every day at work, without fail.

Never got tired of pizza.

I've had some yummy pizza in Colorado but have yet to find a delicious pizza here.

We still got it.

Ervin is up

awaiting rand, once again i left the scale and didn't flip anything so looks like a person is 1 and doesn't is 21

Looks like a person - Doesn't look like a person

i'm probably fine in the 9-13 range with a slight lean towards the lower part of the scale

11 gives us the most coverage. should scoop some points no matter what wavelength erv is on. unless we're completely differing waves

10 is still my preferred as these pants do look personlike.

wow i'm way different

i think he's going for the doesn't look like a person side pretty strongly

i'd prob say something like 17

how do you differentiate this when cluing?

Animals?

Like maybe this is a 17. Has eyes and a mouth. Doesn't otherwise look like a person.

I bet he found those pants by googling: pants that look like a person

Do these pants look like a person? Yes or no.

If the answer is yes, think you gotta go 1-11

Does this fish look like a person? Yes or no.

If the answer is no, think you gotta go 11-21.

The monkey and alien pics I posted before probably are answered in the affirmative.

they look like a pair of pants

yes it vaguely looks like a face, but it's a pair of pants

the fish looks more like a person imo

the monkey/alien pics are probably the 8-11 range

Uh oh, we are very different wavelengths. The question is where's Erv's head at

What's 1-7?

idk this is a dumb scale, but if an inanimate object folded a certain way is on the person side, then there is no way to clue for 12-21

maybe 17 was high, but something like 14 is much more likely than 10 imo

My range was 9-13 so I could get up to the top end.

It's not is a person-is not a person spectrum

Pants that look like a person would be 17-19 on that scale.

This scale is looks like a person - doesn't look like a person.

These are pants that look like a person.

Sure they are pants, but anything that looks like a person in any fashion whatsoever isn't 16+

That's like the nut high top.

This looks like a person, and on a looking like a person scale should fall within that.

Erv loves one of us and hates the other. God bless

i think we're almost on the same page but we're thinking about the scale differently. the way you're looking at it makes it impossible to clue the right side imo

this looks about 25% like a person (looks much more like a pair of pants than a person) so my range is 14-17