In other news
In the current news climate we see that some figures and events tend to dominate the front-pages heavily. Still, there a
I guess we now know why Trump soft-fired Tulsi. There was no point in waiting for this story to drop to make the move.
To be clear, she didn't get fired for taking directives from a cult. She got fired for taking directives from the wrong cult, which makes it even funnier.
You must be new to the internet 😉
Or, just hit that little text only button on your browser.
House approves major housing affordability bill, sending measure to Trump
House GOP leaders fast-tracked the legislation after the Senate approved it with overwhelming bipartisan support Monday. It passed the House in a 358 to 32 vote and now heads to President Trump to sign into law.
The legislation, known as the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, is the product of months of negotiations and aims to increase housing supply and lower prices. It places limits on corporate investors buying single-family homes, streamlines environmental reviews and removes regulatory barriers to speed up the construction process.
Earlier this month, the White House called on Congress to pass the bill, noting the provision setting restrictions on corporate investors owning single-family properties. A presidential proclamation called it "the most comprehensive and consequential housing legislation in the history of our country."
You must be new to the internet 😉
Internet next in line after I figure out how to work my eight-track player.
Thanks for the pro tip!
Just not the parts about love thy neighbor, or thou shalt not lie, or do unto others, or thou shalt not steal, or......................................................
Now that I think about it, is there anything in there that republicans really believe?
https://apnews.com/article/texas-curricu...
Texas would make Bible stories required reading for more than 5 million public school students under a proposal that has reignited debate over widening efforts in the U.S. to put more religion in classrooms.
Just not the parts about love thy neighbor, or thou shalt not lie, or do unto others, or thou shalt not steal, or......................................................
Now that I think about it, is there anything in there that republicans really believe?
Well, on that showing they don't believe in the US Constitution, but, since the First Amendment does exist, the policy in question would be open to legal challenge.
Platner being accused of sexual assault, and it seems quite credible.
Is it too late for him to drop out?
https://www.politico.com/news/2026/07/06...
A woman who dated Maine U.S. Senate candidate Graham Platner says he forced her to have sex with him nearly five years ago despite her repeated objections, an allegation Platner denies.
The woman, a 41-year-old Maine resident named Jenny Racicot, detailed the alleged incident to POLITICO in three interviews over the past two weeks. POLITICO also spoke with a man Racicot dated and confided in the years after the alleged incident, and reviewed documents, including emails between Racicot and her therapist and messages between Racicot and an acquaintance whom she warned against getting involved with Platner years before he ran for office.
Racicot said she had an on-and-off relationship with Platner, who is now the Democratic Senate nominee in Maine, for more than two years before he entered her rural Maine home uninvited one night in late 2021, deeply intoxicated, and forced himself on her while she repeatedly told him to stop. She said she cut off contact with him after telling him the encounter was not consensual.
“I remember him grabbing my pelvis and being really forceful of me,” she said. “I remember the specific moment where I thought to myself, like, ‘This is no longer my choice.’”
Platner denied the allegations.
“These allegations are troubling, serious, and false. Any accusation of non-consensual behavior is categorically untrue,” he said in a statement.
Racicot previously described “reckless” and “unsettling” behavior by Platner to The New York Times, but says she didn’t go public with the specific assault claim because she didn’t want to be known as a rape victim.
Racicot said she later felt compelled to go public about her experience because the reaction to the Times story was dominated by controversy about another woman, Lyndsey Fifield, who alleged Platner mistreated her and faced attacks because of her ties to the Republican Party. (Contacted by POLITICO, Fifield stood by the allegations she made to the Times and declined to comment further.)
His denial from the same article is vague and conspiratorial. She gave a very specific date and time, had documentation of her issue with past relationships and a therapist. There’s more evidence of this guy being a rapist than there is of DJT being a rapist.
In a statement, the Platner campaign reiterated his denial and accused critics of trying to drive him out of the race.
“These allegations are very serious and Graham vigorously denies them. They are also coached and coordinated by out of state establishment operatives. For a year, opponents of this campaign have thrown everything they can at Graham –– calling him a Nazi, a war criminal, and a communist. None of it has been true and this is no different. It is not a coincidence that this story comes a week before the ballot deadline, just as the previous false allegations came a week before the primary. Graham began this campaign to fight for a Maine where everyone is treated with dignity and where Mainers are put first, and no amount of desperate smears will stop this movement from seeing that vision through.”
I don’t think I could vote for the guy if I lived in Maine.
Part of their defense is that people also said he was a Nazi and that wasn’t true.
Personally, I would not bring up my candidates Nazi tattoo but maybe it distracts from the rape.
They aren’t pulling him at this point. No way.
he is a Nazi. just not in the Hitler German National Socialist way. he was a Nazi to all the Iraqi and Afghani kids that he killed. he got the tattoo bc he was so proud of that. just bc he loves Jews does not mean he is less bad than the Nazis.
Hegseth Nazi
Part of their defense is that people also said he was a Nazi and that wasn’t true.
Personally, I would not bring up my candidates Nazi tattoo but maybe it distracts from the rape.
They aren’t pulling him at this point. No way.
It’s dubious that he didn’t know what the tattoo meant. I was willing to set that aside because it doesn’t seem like that’s his current viewpoint. However, him raping someone and denying it is perpetuating the rape, if it’s true.
He was already unlikely to win because Collins legitimately has a better ground game than him, but I don’t see how he recovers from this.
It’s dubious that he didn’t know what the tattoo meant.
its not. he has reddit posts where he talks about that symbol.
i mean the guy is obviously a total psychopath, but i fail to see why that should disqualify him from anything in usa#1
Platner being accused of sexual assault, and it seems quite credible.Is it too late for him to drop out?https://www.politico.com/news/2026/07/06...His denial from the same article is vague and conspiratorial. She gave a very specific date and time, had documentation of her issue with past relationships and a therapist. There’s more
He lost Ro Khanna who says he needs to step down
right, your Jewish Supremacism is showing once again. repurposing Nazi symbols to taunt the Iraqi families that you murder is fine so long as you dont taunt Jews with them.
I’d say hating Jews is a requirement to be a nazi. People can repurpose nazi symbols without themselves being nazis.
Here’s a fun thought, people can be evil without being nazis! Shocking, I know. Here’s another fun thought, Jews can be evil!
Idk what you’re even trying to say but I’m not interested.
I’d say hating Jews is a requirement to be a nazi.
thats bc you dont understand how language evolves
Idk what you’re even trying to say but I’m not interested.
you are trying to muddy the waters by pretending like theres a possibility he didnt know. using words like "dubious". its not dubious. its certain.
it does illustrate the rigor you use to label someone a Nazi, but your gullibility around their symbols.
