GGPoker, Elky and Fedor: HS Regs' Perspective
After the events of the last few weeks, I wanted to write a post detailing what has happened with GG from the perspective of the HS community.
I personally haven't been playing much poker in the last year, but as a moderator in the HS group have a good oversight of the situation.
For anyone unaware, on November the 8th GG Poker:
- Removed VIP games
- Added Exclusive games where a host gives access
- Added 2knl with an exact copy of 1knl rake, 8bb/100 at the tables
Background to our relationship with GG:
- March 2023 - GG doubles rake at VIP tables overnight with no announcement. Regs realise through TOCs, and organise a mass boycott of the games.
- April 2023 - Elky acting as a rep for GG helps to present the data we provide on why this rake structure change will hurt their bottom line. We close the boycott with just a small rake increase, reduced rake 2-3 handed, and the promises to work more closely together in future
- April 2023 - Early 2024 - We provide a lot of data to GG poker about rake and action from other sites, mainly with the aim of reducing 2-3 handed rake so pros can battle each other, start tables, as they do elsewhere. Elky seems receptive and on board, but GG themselves don't believe that pros will play pros at any rake structure, despite the overwhelming evidence from ACR.
- In the same period, GG agree to give us more input to security, and some long term consensus cheating accounts disappear. Elky goes as far to say he will instantly freeze accounts for investigation, if the HS group mods are 90% sure they are cheating,. We take this bar very seriously, collecting evidence on many accounts, but only use it on two occasions.
- January 2024 - GG Changes their game integrity format, with Fedor as the new game integrity advisor
- Feb 2024 - myself and the PLO rep meet with Fedor on call, and discuss the issues we think are most important. I felt it was a very useful call, he communicated GGs standpoint on various issues, made it seem easier to understand, and also seemed open some ideas we had.
- Feb 2024 to present - Fedor and Elky respond with delays in the chat, but generally I'd say the relationship was good, things didn't get any worse on GG poker. Since then we only reported 2 accounts cheating, both were investigated at least, albeit with a long delay. The second account, Dennis Vetter, was still cheating and playing up to the last day of the VIP games, albeit only reported a week or so before. In the latter months Elky was kind of AFK, we heard he had some sickness so thought it could be that.
So in general, although things were not ideal obviously with high rake, low WR - GG poker seemed to be making an effort with GI and at least there was a line between players and the business.
I would also note that personally I endeavoured to only suggest ideas that would both be beneficial for the regs, and the business (lower rake HU and 3handed the most obvious example), hoping that this would keep some mutual respect rather than spamming with pie in the sky thinking.
My general feeling from these interactions was that:
- GG is profit maximising, but a smart company in general
- Elky was genuinely trying to make an effort to protect player interests. Fedor harder to get a read on, on occasions felt like he wasn't properly reading our messages fully and didn't really think we understood the landscape or situation. EG I provided a report with 4 GTOwiz hits for the same player, and noted that there were infinite more (it was every hand) but I would avoid spamming as they have already been emailed to support, and he responded a month later with a message about how GTOwiz hits can't be used as evidence and this case doesn't look particularly obvious.
For me personally this was a bit frustrating as I was filtering hard which reports from the HS community I thought merited being pushed to this level.
This brings us to early November:
Rumours start to abound that GG are making HS games private. We ask Elky for information, he says on 07/11:
Less than 24 hours later, he is in the middle of a marathon 10 hour session with a table full of recs in these new exclusive games.
Meanwhile, I message Fedor privately to ask what's going on. He says Elky will have to answer, and he has no insight to that part of the company, but he's not planning to play the games.
I message Elky saying I will publish something but can wait for his comment, and he says he'll have something by end of the day - but sends nothing.
Fedor then starts to grind the games too, pming to say he'll probably be playing here and there after all.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My conclusions from this period are as follows:
GG
GG is a business, it cares about it's bottom line.
It didn't believe HS games were profitable after transaction costs, game integrity, so decided to privatise them with hosts, and raise the rake. I mostly believe the that they didn't much profit from these games. Recreationals have very high PVIs and acquisition costs,
I think over time regs will be allowed back in to increase the liquidity, obviously paying higher rake, likely giving some % of their action the game runners.
What seems clear though is that GG doesn't care about poker as competition/meritocracy or the HS dream.
Despite overwhelming evidence, they maintain that regs won't play regs no matter the rake.
The profitable variants that remain on GG website are largely only profitable through promotions. At 1knl a huge % of regs w/r comes from promotions (leaderboard, envelopes) that GG can pull at any point.
And from the leaks from PokerOK CEO/ other sources privy to their plans, it seems they aren't really concerned about it being possible to win in the long run. If they haven't come for your format now, they will in future.
There is nothing morally wrong with businesses pursuing maximum profit imo, and maybe they should be expected to. In GGs pursuit of growth, they actually resurrected HS poker too, probably benefitting most 500nl+ players to this point.
But if you are a poker player representing the business, with the information I have it seems you have to concede that you care more about the business than the other players or poker as a competitive game, which brings me to;
Elky and Fedor
Their brand is attached to GG. Until this recent period I genuinely would say I believe they were just realistic people who cared about the players interests, but understood they were operating within a business framework and radical change is unrealistic.
This last period though has made me question this assumption to say the least, and unless any further information comes to light, it seems reasonable to say they care more about their bottom line than the game itself.
This is also fine, it's not in my personal taste, especially if already extremely wealthy, but people through the whole of history have prioritised their own financial situation over 'moral' interests. It can also be debated if 'protecting the ability to win at poker HS' is a moral interest, but for me it's the thing that drew me to the game. No politics, just strategy, and the ability to test your strategy vs whomever you'd like.
It doesn't make them evil or bad, but silence on this particularly in Elkys case does mean they can't claim to be champions of the game in my opinion, and this should be acknowledged.
What can we do
Publicly support sites and ambassadors that do seem to have interest in maintaining the game, and the opportunity to play highstakes.
Right now this is:
- ACR, whose reps have been very responsive to feedback from the HS community in general, albeit maybe lacking the business competence of GG
- CoinPoker, with new ownership, Pads, big interesting promos coming
- WPTpoker, with HS games and competent GI as far as I can tell, and an interest in engaging with the players
Research rake and please think before you aimlessly play these new games GG offer. and vindicate their decision making. I counted 80 entries into 2k yesterday with 4 profitable seats.
Honestly though, when one site has the monopoly and seems to be trying to push it, it's almost every other platform.
For anyone reading from these or other sites, we have a discord with all the HS players in which we coordinated to try and make GI easier, streamline investigations and reports, feel free to reach out.
Any reasonable questions I'll do my best to answer in the thread.
No one is stopping them from competing with each other they just are stopping them from fleecing the marks so it is a lie to claim this is about wanting competition. Indeed the point is to be given access to players specifically because they are not actual competition. And why should good poker players be given monetary awards? I understand they want them but they want others to do the hard work of getting the whales while they get the bigger share of the profit.
Also, who you would rather see and observe play? Few "sponsored pros" that are not that good and playing vs recs players, or actual best poker players playing and competing for being rewarded to get into games with recs.
I mean I fully understand why poker sites would reward streamers, as they do want to bring all the attention and promotion to the sites that they can get. I just think these things could be done in a more mindful manner and they would be better served by leaving some public HS tables.
I disagree. Let me explain why. If you were a whale would you prefer a table with 6 whales and 3 sharks or a table with 2 whales and 7 sharks? Finding sharks is easy. Finding whales is hard. GG is designing the game to appeal to the whales.
So where are all the whales? The games are dead. I don't think I've seen a full table once, it's just a table or two of short handed play with Elky, Misha and a occasional fish...
I disagree. Let me explain why. If you were a whale would you prefer a table with 6 whales and 3 sharks or a table with 2 whales and 7 sharks? Finding sharks is easy. Finding whales is hard. GG is designing the game to appeal to the whales.
A lot of whales just like to gamble and don’t even realize who are crushers and who aren’t and who he might prefer to lose his money to. Friend of mine who easily qualifies as a whale regularly goes to the casino to play some poker and have a few drinks. Does he realize he’s a dog? Of course. But he won’t see the difference between a -10bb loser and a top reg at the table.
And is your friend playing a $100 thousand stack? There are true whales that play and lose big money and big fish in a small pond that get called whales that are very different than true whales.
Give a fair market place and let the people decide.
What GG is doing now I am not convinced it's to GG's best interests.
Sadly for you GG gets to decide what is in their best interest not you. They have a great deal more information about their costs and net in various games than you do, Why do you think you know the actual net benefit/loss here? Do you agree GG has more information about their profits than you do?
And is your friend playing a $100 thousand stack? There are true whales that play and lose big money and big fish in a small pond that get called whales that are very different than true whales.
Zachas would play 40k for a few days and follow it up by grinding 200nl R&C the next week.
I disagree. Let me explain why. If you were a whale would you prefer a table with 6 whales and 3 sharks or a table with 2 whales and 7 sharks? Finding sharks is easy. Finding whales is hard. GG is designing the game to appeal to the whales.
WPT Poker has a two pros per table limit, and they use AI to determine who is pro or not. I'm sure there's some problems with this system too, but at least it's not a racket that leaves a foul taste in the mouth of pretty much anyone who knows what's going on.
WPT Poker has a two pros per table limit, and they use AI to determine who is pro or not. I'm sure there's some problems with this system too, but at least it's not a racket that leaves a foul taste in the mouth of pretty much anyone who knows what's going on.
Except for them having extremely high rake + got rid of the 40% affiliate rakeback if you are labeled a pro
WPT Poker has a two pros per table limit, and they use AI to determine who is pro or not. I'm sure there's some problems with this system too, but at least it's not a racket that leaves a foul taste in the mouth of pretty much anyone who knows what's going on.
That is not true.
WPT got a 2 pro per table where the liquidity is high, aka low stakes.
At 5/10$+ it's 5-6 pros pee table around 1-2 fish with higher rake then GG.
Except for them having extremely high rake + got rid of the 40% affiliate rakeback if you are labeled a pro
I’ve listened to a few interviews with their execs and they basically argue it’s impossible for a new market entrant to invest in site security, software, and customer acquisition with low rake. Remains to be seen how they implement everything on the new NA site, but they seemed reasonable to me. If my hourly stays the same I’m fine with giving up some rakeback and volume.
Why is Elky even a sponsored pro any more? Does he have any significant results in the last 10-15 years? Just because of his bleached hair? Dude has nothing going for him in terms of either poker skill or charisma.
Because his face makes for a good emoji.
No game is even better than more rake
WP GG
how does it work over at coin, do they just p2p you a set amount that is your roll for the day and at the end of x hours you get to chop the balance or something??
Why I ask is do you think GG is doing something similar for Elky/Fedor as no way theyre firing their own money..
Just catching up with this thread, wanted to quickly clarify that CoinPoker have never given me a single cent towards my buy ins for their online games, even the streamed ones.
Can Rakeback mitigate this? What's the best deal you've got?
Lmao 😃 ♥
My man YMB not holding back on Twitter...
I thought online poker couldn’t become more ridiculous, I guess it can
wow
innerpsy just became the best player in the world overnight, what a god
Just ludicrous. Wasn't the point of doing this to prevent HS recs from hemorrhaging to a select few players? So now they just get to hemorrhage to one (two) guy instead?
is boycott 2.0 on the way?