President Donald Trump
I assume it's still acceptable to have a Trump thread in a Politics forum?
So this is an obvious lie - basically aimed at
mong, what were you doing to be mean to her?
That's neat but billions of people agree with me. I'd love to see you take your little tough guy act to the White House for a meeting with the Don.
Hpnestly, I'd love 3 minutes alone with Donnie. Im pretty sure I'd be able to solve quite a lot of the world's most pressing current problems happily, for the sake of humanity.
Mr Spock, if you don’t mind. The good doctor was the author of childcare books in the 60s.
But yes, you’ve made a point I was thinking about all through this derail. People here are obsessed with rationality, and of course it’s something to strive for, but it’s not frequently seen in the human world and an intermittent absence of it doesn’t denote a stupid person.
Almost all crackpot theories have fallacious arguments for it that smart people won't fall for. Sometimes a smart person will believe in the theory. But if he is not delusional he will not claim that the arguments should sway good thinkers into thinking his theory is the favorite to be true. But the majority of those who believe in a crackpot theory do indeed think that those arguments should sway argument evaluators, and they couldn't think that if they were smart. (another exception is, of course Einstein).
I had a girl at work go to HR about me claiming I was harassing her and being mean too her.
i'd tell HR to stick their opinions up their asses, if I were you. It's what Donnie would do, after all.
Honestly, an alpha like you should be ashamed of not doing exactly that. You should do it asap, otherwise people might start thinking you're a democrat.
I'm sure the bolded is correct. But it is probably correct about a lot of things.
Is discussion of Plato (whether informed or uninformed) some sort of big thing among Roganbros? That surprises me, but I don't listen to those guys, so I guess I wouldn't know. What is the point of the discussion?
Yes, the podcast bros love to wax poetic about rationalism and stoicism, especially in juxtaposition to the alleged emotional hysteria of women. And of course they reference the philosophers who told them they embody these qualities purely because they possess a penis. They gobble it up.
Either I missed some posts about eugenics or people don't know the definition of eugenics.
he obviously doesn't say those parts out loud but that's essentially the nature of his posts - that if we could somehow cleanse the earth of stupid white people then everything would be solved
sounds like someone still bitter he got picked last for kickball imo
he obviously doesn't say those parts out loud but that's essentially the nature of his posts - that if we could somehow cleanse the earth of stupid white people then everything would be solved
sounds like someone still bitter he got picked last for kickball imo
We can debate the extent to which it is appropriate to blame the ills of the country on stupid white people, but it's a pretty big stretch to argue that doing so is promoting eugenics.
Yes, the podcast bros love to wax poetic about rationalism and stoicism, especially in juxtaposition to the alleged emotional hysteria of women. And of course they reference the philosophers who told them they embody these qualities purely because they possess a penis. They gobble it up.
Like I said, I don't listen to those guys, but the waxing poetic that you describe sounds ridiculous. Logic and rationalism are much more of a friend than an enemy to feminism.
Almost all crackpot theories have fallacious arguments for it that smart people won't fall for. Sometimes a smart person will believe in the theory. But if he is not delusional he will not claim that the arguments should sway good thinkers into thinking his theory is the favorite to be true. But the majority of those who believe in a crackpot theory do indeed think that those a
I hope for Mason's sake that you don't view "Trump will be good for the poker economy" as a crackpot theory.
i'd tell HR to stick their opinions up their asses, if I were you. It's what Donnie would do, after all.
Honestly, an alpha like you should be ashamed of not doing exactly that. You should do it asap, otherwise people might start thinking you're a democrat.
Maybe tell her to shut up piggy.
She was the same girl I was hanging out with over the summer. She had been furloughed and I didn't think she would be welcomed back. When they did hire her back I stopped asking her to hang out because I am her boss. She didn't like this. Now she is working in a very awkward environment. She divulged to HR private conversations we had as consensual adults over the summer. She accused me of crazy things that I could easily disprove with text messages. She took a kill shot and missed.
She was the same girl I was hanging out with over the summer. She had been furloughed and I didn't think she would be welcomed back. When they did hire her back I stopped asking her to hang out because I am her boss. She didn't like this. Now she is working in a very awkward environment. She took a kill shot and missed.
It's so weird. You always claim that your previous posts were taken out of context, but then you come back with gems like this. Trying repeatedly to get with a furloughed subordinate employee because you thought she would never be asked to return to work is awkward at best. And taking the attitude of "if you come at the king, you best not miss" is hugely problematic.
Mongo: hey sweet cheeks, show me your tits
Woman: ?
Mongo: come on, I’ll pay you
*repeat for a while*
Mongo: wait why didn’t you tell me you were mad?
Also
Mongo: she’s probably on drugs
Probably
We spoke about certain things over the summer when she wasn't working with the company. It was all consensual and reciprocal.
She smokes a ton of weed for sure. She has no called no showed for three days before. She is constantly looking to borrow small amounts of money. We think there is significant evidence she has drug issues.
We spoke about certain things over the summer when she wasn't working with the company. It was all consensual and reciprocal.
She smokes a ton of weed for sure. She has no called no showed for three days before. She is constantly looking to borrow small amounts of money. We think there is significant evidence she has drug issues.
So you're targeting her because she seems to be having life problems?