President Donald Trump

President Donald Trump

I assume it's still acceptable to have a Trump thread in a Politics forum?

So this is an obvious lie - basically aimed at

105 Views
28 April 2019 at 04:18 AM
Reply...

39479 Replies


Earlier posts are available on our legacy forum HERE

by Victor

so is the liberal opposition. they cite gas prices, and the cost of the war. and ofc Dems supporters are extremely critical that the war has failed.

anyone opposing this war on the basis of morality should be extremely happy that the US and Israel lost.

I'm surprised that you believe liberal opposition to the war is grounded in inward-looking nativism. I would have expected you to say that all liberal opposition to the war is performative and that they actually love the war


Maybe stop debating Victor?


by StoppedRainingMen

Maybe stop debating Victor?

I wasn't really debating Victor. My original comment wasn't a response to him.

In any case, you go back and forth with all sorts of posters.


by geezerchess

Thanks for the notification.

Quick personal question if I may be so bold: Do you have LandOlakes blocked, and if so why?

Yes. Because I also don't tolerate sandy hook conspiracy theorists. Believing those children were part of some nefarious hoax is completely intolerable to me.


by Rococo

I'm surprised that you believe liberal opposition to the war is grounded in inward-looking nativism. I would have expected you to say that all liberal opposition to the war is performative and that they actually love the war

well Dem politicians by and large support all war. thats why they always just come short of imposing the bare minimum in the War Powers Act. thats why Schumer calls Trump a taco when he doesnt bomb Iran. thats why Obama straight up said they planned a war with Iran ad the JCPOA was to buy time. thats why Kamala campaigned on being tougher than Trump on Iran.

Dem supporters would absolutely support this if Biden or Obama were doing it.


by Gorgonian

Yes. Because I also don't tolerate sandy hook conspiracy theorists. Believing those children were part of some nefarious hoax is completely intolerable to me.

LoL is a Sandy Hook truther?


by Victor

so is the liberal opposition. they cite gas prices, and the cost of the war. and ofc Dems supporters are extremely critical that the war has failed.

anyone opposing this war on the basis of morality should be extremely happy that the US and Israel lost.

I think you're a tad premature in suggesting that the Zionist Coalition (TM Pending) has lost.


by geezerchess

I think you're a tad premature in suggesting that the Zionist Coalition (TM Pending) has lost.

its the Epstein Coalition. but thats true, I should have said they are "losing" or they lost this round.


by Rococo

I'm surprised that you believe liberal opposition to the war is grounded in inward-looking nativism. I would have expected you to say that all liberal opposition to the war is performative and that they actually love the war

...for fun and profit!


by Gorgonian

Yes. Because I also don't tolerate sandy hook conspiracy theorists. Believing those children were part of some nefarious hoax is completely intolerable to me.

I knew Luckbox believed the Sandy Hook Conspiracy, but I didn't know that LandoLakes did as well.


by Rococo

LoL is a Sandy Hook truther?

That seems extremely unlikely to me as well.


by Victor

its the Epstein Coalition. but thats true, I should have said they are "losing" or they lost this round.

I agree. It's essentially a draw so far, which is the equivalent of the Epstein/Zionist Coalition (TM Pending) losing.


by Land O Lakes

Yes, I realize that.In the US, though, the reality is there are a lot of sickos and they like to take their life's frustrations out on innocent people in crowds. See Vegas shooting, see Sandy Hook, see thousands of other examples. Would it be better if no guns existed - none for criminals, none for citizens, none for police? Yes. That's not reality. Is it possible to work towar

Doesn't look like a Sandy Hook Truther to me.


by Rococo

LoL is a Sandy Hook truther?

I might have him mixed up with luckbox honestly. I have them both blocked so I don't remember which is which, honestly. My apologies if so.


by geezerchess

I knew Luckbox believed the Sandy Hook Conspiracy, but I didn't know that LandoLakes did as well.

That might be it. Sorry if I got them mixed up. Don't remember with LoL then. Maybe I'll second chance him.


by Gorgonian

I might have him mixed up with luckbox honestly. I have them both blocked so I don't remember which is which, honestly. My apologies if so.

Luckbox definitely is a Sandy Hook truther.


by Gorgonian

I might have him mixed up with luckbox honestly. I have them both blocked so I don't remember which is which, honestly. My apologies if so.

Fair enough.

That said, why do you have LandOLakes blocked? If anyone would want to block LandOLakes you'd think it would be me or Elway.


by Rococo

I wasn't really debating Victor. My original comment wasn't a response to him.

In any case, you go back and forth with all sorts of posters.

True but nobody takes me seriously and 50% want me banned or taking it up the ass for some strange reason

Hold yourself to a higher standard than me


by geezerchess

Doesn't look like a Sandy Hook Truther to me.

In before Rick calls me 'spineless' for standing up for one of my chief antagonists.


I think if we were to do a catch all on ppl who shouldn’t be taken seriously in this thread/forum and their reasons why and being fair on why I appear detested it should go as follows:

Me: I do nothing but insult people who I feel are completely off the rails
Lozen: absolutely zero arguments in defense or anything he stands for, his entire life thrives on whataboutism
Lagtight: deeply weird Bible thumper. Hates the gays
Victor: everything is somehow turned into a ‘biden did genocide’ regardless of what is being discussed
El Mongo: won’t own that he’s mongo. Is offended by being called a rapist, is a rapist (most likely)

Feel free to put the 4 of us on ignore


by StoppedRainingMen

I think if we were to do a catch all on ppl who shouldn’t be taken seriously in this thread/forum and their reasons why and being fair on why I appear detested it should go as follows:

If we took the next step and compared the bolded list to the list of people who post the most frequently, I suspect that the results would be dismaying.


by StoppedRainingMen

Me: I do nothing but insult people who I feel are completely off the rails

SRM,

You deserve bonus points for self-awareness. It's a rare trait around these parts.


by StoppedRainingMen

I think if we were to do a catch all on ppl who shouldn’t be taken seriously in this thread/forum and their reasons why and being fair on why I appear detested it should go as follows:Me: I do nothing but insult people who I feel are completely off the railsLozen: absolutely zero arguments in defense or anything he stands for, his entire life thrives on whataboutism

Could an administrator please change my undertitle to the bolded? Thanking y'all in advance!

Hates the gays

That's just false.

Victor: everything is somehow turned into a ‘biden did genocide’ regardless of what is being discussed
El Mongo: won’t own that he’s mongo. Is offended by being called a rapist, is a rapist (most likely)

Feel free to put the 4 of us on ignore

Five out of every four Americans are bad at math.


by geezerchess

Fair enough.

That said, why do you have LandOLakes blocked? If anyone would want to block LandOLakes you'd think it would be me or Elway.

I did a forum search for my last interaction with him, and it seems I blocked him because he was being a misogynist idiot who tried to deny it by saying his financial advisor was a woman (which is the equivalent of saying "I can't be racist I have black friends") and then pretended to not understand you can still be misogynist and have a female financial advisor, while trotting out the R-slur repeatedly (in lightly modified form). Yeah, I just have no patience for people like that.

Oh and it appears he was also trying to fat shame me because I showed a receipt where I ordered 2 double cheeseburgers from mcdonalds once. It was at least VERY important to him to find out if I normally order 2 of them - to the point where he harped on about it for multiple pages trying to get me to admit I'm a pig (I'm not for the record, I'm actually under-weight right now because of a recent health issue).

I'm not giving him a second chance. That forum search was enough to tell me not to bother.


by Rococo

If we took the next step and compared the bolded list to the list of people who post the most frequently, I suspect that the results would be dismaying.

Especially that Lagtight idiot.

(Speaking of self-awareness.)

Reply...