President Donald Trump
I assume it's still acceptable to have a Trump thread in a Politics forum?
So this is an obvious lie - basically aimed at
You want to create an equivalency of a backpacker being in a visa grey area for doing house work for shelter to people storming the capitol building and violently attacking people? But protesting Tesla is domestic terrorism?
What are you doing?
People were literally imprisoned for months for simply walking in the Capitol ESCORTED by police. Some for simply being NEAR the Capitol. Democrats have stormed capitol buildings multiple times in the last few years with no repercussions.
You want to create an equivalency of a backpacker being in a visa grey area for doing house work for shelter to people storming the capitol building and violently attacking people? But protesting Tesla is domestic terrorism?
First, the vast majority were not engaged in violence of any sort, and yes attacking Tesla dealerships should land you in GITMO indefinitely without trial.
lol, that's definition of escorted is quite similar to gorg's definition of forced
Indeed and I think we all watched the videos but clearly didn't see the same things.
I know you deleted the post now but that Soros conspiracy nonsense was hilarious. Why do you think it's wrong to protest a plutocratic takeover? In what world is Elon a victim here? The richest man in the world is unilaterally ruining peoples lives and recklessly steering everyone into unchartered waters. You think they are the problem?
not enough qualifications yet. Needs to be more of a bastard to really be suited to it.
They can't even get the words right on their bill. They talk about
"Symptoms may include Trump-induced general hysteria, which produces an inability to distinguish between legitimate policy differences and signs of psychic pathology in President Donald J. Trump’s behavior."
what the actual **** is 'psychic pathology' lol
Fox talking about if people should get the death penalty for targeting Tesla
Indeed and I think we all watched the videos but clearly didn't see the same things.
I know you deleted the post now but that Soros conspiracy nonsense was hilarious. Why do you think it's wrong to protest a plutocratic takeover? In what world is Elon a victim here? The richest man in the world is unilaterally ruining peoples lives and recklessly steering everyone into unchartered waters. You think they are the problem?
"It's nonsense cuz I say so"....good argument.
Elon is simply exposing fraud and doing what more than half the country voted for. Oh no, some lazy gov't employees lose their job. Boo hoo. I worked for the Fed's. Nothing but lazy people and waste. Most the country ABSOLUTELY LOVES what Elon's doing. 99% of the country DOES NOT work for the federal gov't.
Fox talking about if people should get the death penalty for targeting Tesla
Yes. Targeting dealerships and private vehicles is the definition of terrorism. Treat them as such. GITMO with no due process. And they're talking about if these actions end up killing someone genius.
We have no power and don't get to control whatever the Dumbocrat party or whoever you're thinking of gets to offer. I guess I get one trillionth of a say when I vote and I didn't vote for an insult comic, so I did my part. The politics forum on 2p2 is just for entertainment.
I focus on positive stuff irl as best I can or want to anyway. Not going to list things, but I do stuff and try. Make your own little chez world what you can. Helping people obv, but try to start a worker cooperative is
We're not powerless. I dont particularly want to have a go at you but it's just not true.
Not keen on you saying that I think people are morons. I just think that they're people
And I feel like coming up with "Twitter clown of record" was a reasonably solid accomplishment.
It's not bad.
I like my 'trump was too stupid to realise he couldn't win'
This is too close to spot on.
Political violence should always be treated as a direct threat to the state and dealt with the maximum possible allowed state violence as the utmost unacceptable crime.
That includes Jan 6 where all violent trespassers should have being killed by the state.
Political violence should always be treated as a direct threat to the state and dealt with the maximum possible allowed state violence as the utmost unacceptable crime.
That includes Jan 6 where all violent trespassers should have being killed by the state.
You also are a ******.
I don't know horrible things have happened to you that you have such contempt & disdain for human life, but it must have been super ****ed up. Because you're a stone cold *******.
Political violence should always be treated as a direct threat to the state and dealt with the maximum possible allowed state violence as the utmost unacceptable crime.
That includes Jan 6 where all violent trespassers should have being killed by the state.
u must be against the 2nd amendment ?
the sole reason its actually exist its to fight the government in cases it become tyrannical right ?
Yes. Targeting dealerships and private vehicles is the definition of terrorism. Treat them as such. GITMO with no due process. And they're talking about if these actions end up killing someone genius.
Political violence should always be treated as a direct threat to the state and dealt with the maximum possible allowed state violence as the utmost unacceptable crime.
That includes Jan 6 where all violent trespassers should have being killed by the state.
What the ****
lol that's when you realize how much you are wasting your time trying to argue with Luciom
Trump signs executive order to dismantle DoEd.
This is blatantly unconstitutional and unlikely to hold up unless there is a radically unhinged ruling by the SC.
lol that's when you realize how much you are wasting your time trying to argue with Luciom
I truly cannot keep up with it all. I'd really love to post well written responses to individuals with my thoughts and evidence to back it up along with questions for follow-up, but there have been something like 30+ pages written since my last post. When a well written, reviewed, and researched post takes >30 minutes to write and obviously a lot of time to read everyone else's responses it is impossible to keep up.
Best of luck to everyone in their debates
I truly cannot keep up with it all. I'd really love to post well written responses to individuals with my thoughts and evidence to back it up along with questions for follow-up, but there have been something like 30+ pages written since my last post. When a well written, reviewed, and researched post takes >30 minutes to write and obviously a lot of time to read everyone else's responses it is impossible to keep up.
Best of luck to everyone in their debates
for the brief interactions we had , I loved the exchanges, disregard how long the thread went after your intervention and stick to what you care to argue about, why not?
Trump signs executive order to dismantle DoEd.
This is blatantly unconstitutional and unlikely to hold up unless there is a radically unhinged ruling by the SC.
why do you think that? the department of education act of 1979 isn't necessarily constitutional.
why do you think congress has unlimited power to create executive agencies? where is that power explicitly listed among congress constitutional powers in the constitution?
