President Donald Trump
I assume it's still acceptable to have a Trump thread in a Politics forum?
So this is an obvious lie - basically aimed at
u must be against the 2nd amendment ?
the sole reason its actually exist its to fight the government in cases it become tyrannical right ?
I am ok with the 2 amendment. sometimes the state can act without being legitimated to do so. that's when armed citizens work as a counter.
I am not sure I understand your objection
Shooting many people on sight sounds like a good example of someone inimical to social order.
shooting many people doing things that are completely against the law in a way that if generalized would bring about the collapse of society is not only reasonable, it is imperative for law enforcement.
the main reason we pay their wages is to assassinate everyone attempting to disrupt society in that way. that's why we allow them to have guns and use them in the first place. that's the whole point of giving the "monopoly" (or superiority) of violence to the state.
What do you think should happen at BLM demonstrations?
nothing during the many peaceful protests by day, in a zillion of places.
shooting to kill by law enforcement every time any kind of violence against property or people started. that usually happened at night.
as with every other protest which turns into a riot.
you know very well after they shoot to kill every single violent monster the first time it completely stops forever right? it takes like 30+ years for anyone in society to even think they could do anything analogous again.
and what you want is for the totality of the population ot not even think they could even evaluate the possibility of being violent against property or people for political purposes, or face automatic and certain death .
that's what a decent society is about. no one even think he could ever achieve anything political with violence without dying immediately
if you want to save the lives of people who end up within a formerly legal protest that turns into a riot, use this:
law enforcement comes with machine guns charged, yells as strongly as it can "you have 10 minutes to disperse", everyone who doesn't go the **** away is mowed down with machine guns and hunted like a rabid dog.
fine?
We're tired of laughing at you clowns and too busy winning. The thing is, conservatives actually work, have families, exercise, hunt, fish, go to church, etc...we're not online all day with Marvel movies on in the background obsessing about how Trump is "destroying democracy" when anyone that is sane actually realizes their day to day lives are much better when he's in office.
lmk anytime you want to stop by the house and compare jobs....
hint: you've been posting all day. I've been working all day.
film at eleven
We're tired of laughing at you clowns and too busy winning. The thing is, conservatives actually work, have families, exercise, hunt, fish, go to church, etc...we're not online all day with Marvel movies on in the background obsessing about how Trump is "destroying democracy" when anyone that is sane actually realizes their day to day lives are much better when he's in office.
“For instance, on the planet Earth, man had always assumed that he was more intelligent than dolphins because he had achieved so much—the wheel, New York, wars and so on—whilst all the dolphins had ever done was muck about in the water having a good time. But conversely, the dolphins had always believed that they were far more intelligent than man—for precisely the same reasons.”
a supposed libertarian arguing in favour of extrajudicial executions for like jaywalkers and ****? very strange
a supposed libertarian arguing in favour of extrajudicial executions for like jaywalkers and ****? very strange
there is nothing extrajudicial in killing violent people en flagrante by law enforcement. it's the purest form of law application.
that's actually one of the first priorities (or should be) of law enforcement: law enforcement being allowed and morally supported to stop criminals in their actions through lethal force is the basis of civil society.
we should literally throw a party to the specific individuals in law enforcement who manage to kill the bad guys and treat them as the heroes that they are when they do so.
killing the bad guys should be considered one of the most moral actions any law enforcement official could do in his career.
exactly like soldiers.
police officers should be ranked and rewarded by the amount of bastards they legally kill on the job
why do you think that? the department of education act of 1979 isn't necessarily constitutional.
why do you think congress has unlimited power to create executive agencies? where is that power explicitly listed among congress constitutional powers in the constitution?
Article 1 section 8, Article 2 section 2
this would allow congress to legislate with some limitations about education , not to create an executive agency with unlimited powers to deal with the topic.
congress probably CAN , say, forbid some topic to be taught in public school or force some topic to be taught in public school.
or finance educational idea X.
but what the hell is the creation of a department with independent powers to regulate education? how is that even vaguely constitutional? every single mandate has to pass congress, the existence of a department is an insanity.
the question is where does the constitution allow congress to create departments that can independently regulate anything at all, even on topics congress could legislate about.
there is nothing extrajudicial in killing violent people en flagrante by law enforcement. it's the purest form of law application.
that's actually one of the first priorities (or should be) of law enforcement: law enforcement being allowed and morally supported to stop criminals in their actions through lethal force is the basis of civil society.
we should literally throw a party to the specific individuals in law enforcement who manage to kill the bad guys and treat them as the heroes that they a
not sure I trust police to be the judge, jury, and executioners of the street. if they have a reason to use deadly force then sure, but the amount you are glorifying it is strange
this would allow congress to legislate with some limitations about education , not to create an executive agency with unlimited powers to deal with the topic.
congress probably CAN , say, forbid some topic to be taught in public school or force some topic to be taught in public school.
but what the hell is the creation of a department with independent powers to regulate education? how is that even vaguely constitutional? every single mandate has to pass congress, the existence of a department is a
I’m not sure it’s worth having this discussion because it doesn’t seem you understand what the DoE even does
also it’s inconsequential what the DoEd does when you consider we are talking about whether the president can dismantle a congressionally created department. the executive is said to have to faithfully execute laws, not make up their own by executive fiat
PARIS, March 20 (Reuters) - A French scientist has been denied entry into the United States, apparently because the scientist had expressed a personal opinion on the Trump administration's research policy, the French Education Ministry said on Thursday.
"I learned with concern that a French researcher on assignment for the French National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS) who was traveling to a conference near Houston was denied entry to the United States before being expelled," Minister for Higher Education and Research Philippe Baptiste said in a statement to AFP.
The measure was apparently taken because the scientist had expressed a personal opinion on the Trump administration's research policy, he added, but did not elaborate.
also it’s inconsequential what the DoEd does when you consider we are talking about whether the president can dismantle a congressionally created department. the executive is said to have to faithfully execute laws, not make up their own by executive fiat
we are talking if congress can create those departments to begin with.
the topic is non-delegation doctrine. you can disagree ofc.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nondeleg....
topic is if congress can legislate on x, it can never ever give those power to anything else.
every single rule that has any impact however small on society has to pass congress.
the executive has to execute lawful laws. but mostly it has to make determinations in a set range of topics. everything else should never be a out the executive at all unless explicitly specified in the constitution.
that includes education.
congress maybe can rule about federal education. it cannot give any power to the executive to do anything about education at all not even vaguely or tangentially. every single education topic had to pass congress as a law.
we are talking if congress can create those departments to begin with.
the topic is non-delegation doctrine. you can disagree ofc.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nondeleg....
topic is if congress can legislate on x, it can never ever give those power to anything else.
every single rule that has any impact however small on society has to pass congress.
the executive has to execute lawful laws. but mostly it h
again, not really important to the discussion and somewhat of a red herring. I’m trying to isolate if, in principle, congress has the constitutional power to create agencies/offices/departments or not. If it does have that power solely then the president cannot by executive action contravene a department established by law. That’s the real focus here.
If you want to argue constitutionality of the department, then you have to have standing to do so, and that would be decided by the courts not the president.
The talk about regulation is off topic.
Political violence should always be treated as a direct threat to the state and dealt with the maximum possible allowed state violence as the utmost unacceptable crime.
That includes Jan 6 where all violent trespassers should have being killed by the state.
I agree with this. But attacks on Teslas are obviously not a threat to the state.
We're tired of laughing at you clowns and too busy winning. The thing is, conservatives actually work, have families, exercise, hunt, fish, go to church, etc...we're not online all day with Marvel movies on in the background obsessing about how Trump is "destroying democracy" when anyone that is sane actually realizes their day to day lives are much better when he's in office.
You seem like a really balanced and happy person lol
For those wondering, fgators has 17 posts in the last day including one saying ‘quit deleting my posts fuckface’
Obviously too busy working
maybe not yet for now, but if linked to "attack to the most important donor of the republican party" they are political violence.
the same would apply if rightwing terrorists burnt down the quarters of every NGO taking money from Soros. they should be hunted like Al Qaeda and executednin the steeets if they tried that. killed like Noem dogs.
Elon is getting briefed on secret plans for any war with China for some ****ing reason.
The only thing revealed in the JFK files seems to be a bunch of social security numbers.
What ****ing morons.
