Moderation Questions
Moderation Questions
8
zs

Moderation Questions

The last iteration of the moderation discussion thread was a complete disaster. Numerous attempts to keep it on topic fa

30 January 2024 at 05:27 AM
Reply...

24466 Replies

8
zs


by Victor m

its also impossible to have an actual conversation on antisemitism and the how extremist Israeli ideology fits in with Jewishness. your post reminds me that one time you said something like "of course I support Israel, I am Jewish." the same sentiment, that by default Jews support Israel, an extremist country doing mass murder, apartheid, mass theft etc, would definitely risk

Dude, there are threads for all your shitty takes, why do you insist on bringing them to this one?


by jalfrezi m

I wanted them to meet unanimous condemnation from every sane person there and leave through their own volition. Call it a hostile environment for fascists, if you like.

I dont mind you calling me insane but maybe dont keep claiming they weren't modded


by jalfrezi m

shrug

The alternative is a UP style liberal echo-chamber that bans dissenters. Maybe that's what you want?

Do you think this is an echo chamber right now? Weren’t you just bitching about the fascists that freely post here?

You live in an alternate reality. Right now you’re complaining about things that aren’t even happening. If your misery needs company can you please go to UP as suggested?


by chezlaw m

I dont mind you calling me insane but maybe dont keep claiming they weren't modded

I would also have liked you to join the sane. I'm not giving up on you.


by Crossnerd m

That’s just the majority of the issue. It’s not whether the moderation is reasonable and fair, it’s just that you (and several others) don’t want to be moderated whatsoever and seem to have found yourselves inexplicably in a moderated space somehow. Maybe you’re the ones who should leave?

He went soemewhere else to discover the true genius of those who spout the same approach he does.

If your misery needs company can you please go to UP as suggested

Didnt the geniuses at UP practice something like this at him. Or did they aactually ban him

I wanted them to meet unanimous condemnation from every sane person there and leave through their own volition.


by jalfrezi m

I would also have liked you to join the sane. I'm not giving up on you.

No chance. But fair play, i haven't given up on getting you to stop giving up.

I'm far too gone with my mentally illness of having some understanding aboiut how disasterous it is to get people to identify more strongly with their worst aspects. And how stupid it is for the geniuses to make them defensive about their worst beliefs and try to run them off.


by Crossnerd m

Do you think this is an echo chamber right now? Weren’t you just bitching about the fascists that freely post here?

You live in an alternate reality. Right now you’re complaining about things that aren’t even happening. If your misery needs company can you please go to UP as suggested?

No it's not an echo chamber right now, of course. I think it was/is a better politics forum than UP, that's for sure, and have said as much elsewhere.


by chezlaw m

He went soemewhere else to discover the true genius of those who spout the same approach he does.

You're salty because you weren't invited.


by chezlaw m

No chance. But fair play, i haven't given up on getting you to stop giving up.

I'm far too gone with my mentally illness of having some understanding aboiut how disasterous it is to get people to identify more strongly with their worst aspects. And how stupid it is for the geniuses to make them defensive about their worst beliefs and try to run them off.

Are you currently experiencing some sort of fit?


by chezlaw m

No chance. But fair play, i haven't given up on getting you to stop giving up.

I'm far too gone with my mentally illness of having some understanding aboiut how disasterous it is to get people to identify more strongly with their worst aspects. And how stupid it is for the geniuses to make them defensive about their worst beliefs and try to run them off.

I feel it's time for your daily reminder that this is a small online forum, not the Houses of ****ing Parliament.


by jalfrezi m

You're salty because you weren't invited.

I've just about recovered from nearly dying from irony. And this was just from the public bits.

Afaik I'm the only person officially not banned (this was he precursor site). One of the more ridiculous bullies banned me. A decision was made to reverse that.


by Crossnerd m

Right, so let the fascists run amok and then let you name call them. This should be great for debate.

I would be ok with moderating racism, but only if that word meant what moderate people who vote republican agree it means, not what radicals think it means.

I have been called a racist to write how obesity is different by ethnicity in the USA *without me ever claiming or implying the causes for it*. That's simply insane.


by jalfrezi m

I feel it's time for your daily reminder that this is a small online forum, not the Houses of ****ing Parliament.

I agree that the best defense for you is that it doesn't matter a jot what we do here.


by chezlaw m

I've just about recovered from nearly dying from irony. And this was just from the public bits.

Afaik I'm the only person officially not banned (this was he precursor site). One of the more ridiculous bullies banned me. A decision was made to reverse that.

Not banned from where? I'm not banned from UP.


There really were some ridiculous bullies, that we can agree.


by Luciom m

I would be ok with moderating racism, but only if that word meant what moderate people who vote republican agree it means, not what radicals think it means.

I have been called a racist to write how obesity is different by ethnicity in the USA *without me ever claiming or implying the causes for it*. That's simply insane.

Guys, there was this one time I was posting about race-related stuff and I wasn't actually being racist. I'm so misunderstood 😑


by chezlaw m

Getting people to identify with their views at their worst is staggeringly stupid politics.

Many people are already identified past the critical point. If people like you don’t like it, then you will have to figure out how to convince them.

by chezlaw m

Self-censored views help with cognitive progress.

Forcing people to self censor as the sole strategy is fine for children, for whom the social self is primary.

It must not be relied upon as the sole strategy for adults. It will too often have a backlash leading to even more anti sociality.


by chezlaw m

I agree that the best defense for you is that it doesn't matter a jot what we do here.

I assumed at the time that was your philosophy with your forum.


by d2_e4 m

Not banned from where? I'm not banned from UP.

There was a vote by the Commissariat and I was offciially not banned


by d2_e4 m

Guys, there was this one time I was posting about race-related stuff and I wasn't actually being racist. I'm so misunderstood 😑

I stopped discussing race as much as i could in this forum because of the utter bad faith of the moderation on that topic.

But recently when a guy uses obesity rates by state to claim given republican led states have more obese people that proves they are worse at governance, i just answered claiming republican led states with high obesity almost always have more blacks and natives (which is the case, objectively) and THAT is why their obesity rates are higher, it has nothing to do with state policy (also because it's kind dumb to think state policy affects obesity at all to begin with).

That was considered super racist and a mod intervened to tell me to stop to talk about that in the trump thread.

It's truly grotesque, there is an obsession to deny factual measurable race differences even in outcomes at this point, even with no mention of possible causes, other than to deny that's caused by state policy (because race differences in obesity rates exist both in democrat led and republican led states: it's just that some republican led states have many blacks).


by chezlaw m

There was a vote by the Commissariat and I was offciially not banned

so there is a forum whose leadership is called "the commissariat"? why isn't jalfrezi a kommissar there already?


by craig1120 m

Many people are already identified past the critical point. If people like you don’t like it, then you will have to figure out how to convince them.

Even if true but that doens't mean we can identify which people have identified past the critical point. Geeniuses aside - they can do it easily of course.

Forcing people to self censor as the sole strategy is fine for children, for whom the social self is primary.

It must not be relied upon as the sole strategy for adults. It will too often have a backlash leading to even more anti sociality.

I agree that a sole strategy should not be relied upon. It is tiny compared to other statagies such as for example, the law.


by Luciom m

I would be ok with moderating racism, but only if that word meant what moderate people who vote republican agree it means, not what radicals think it means.

I have been called a racist to write how obesity is different by ethnicity in the USA *without me ever claiming or implying the causes for it*. That's simply insane.

I took specific exception with this post:

freakdaddy do you understand that you could run a top 10 of the states with the highest percentage of white or asian residents in and it would be almost identical to every top10 positive list you just posted?

and the states with the highest black / natives percentages of the population are almost identical to the negative top 10 lists you made? except blacks /natives in republican states don't usually vote republican?

is that element clear to you?

do you understand race is the determinant for basically everything that matters when comparing areas of the USA, much more than everything else combined? and that the same is true within all states?

like you pick the safest highest income happiest areas and the opposite, and it's virtually always whites and Asians vs blacks and natives, within each state?

You picked state obesity rate because of the fact that black people have a higher obesity rate than average. While this is a true statistic I proved to you statistically that you were wrong

do you understand race is the determinant for basically everything that matters when comparing areas of the USA

on your specific selection of obesity. Slam dunk, the statistics don't back you up. That is literally all that happened. I didn't look into any other top 10 because you specifically picked obesity.

Now, I and possibly others, called you racist and I called that post "race sciency" because .... well.... you've expressed race science thoughts before! OMG what a shocker! I've called you out for having a racial tier list that you literally touched on in the post I took exception towards! Like, what do you want us to do Luciom?!?

The good news is you are generally fairly modable. You don't start harassing mods because you don't like what they say though you might pout and whine about it a bit, you keep it mostly objective. You also drive a ton of conversation here while doing it mostly within the lines.


by chezlaw m

Even if true but that doens't mean we can identify which people have identified past the critical point. Geeniuses aside - they can do it easily of course.

Ok, but we can identify which views have lasted beyond the critical point, right?

Has censoring racism made it go away? Just a little more censorship and we’ll get there?


by chezlaw m

There was a vote by the Commissariat and I was offciially not banned

You said "afaik I am the only person officially not banned". I'm not banned there either. Not for lack of trying, to be fair.

Reply...