President Elon Musk
He probably deserves his own thread at this point, discuss accordingly
He thinks war veterans who have been suffering for PTSD for decades can be cured within a few days if they switch to only eating meat and eggs and nothing else. I think I've got this one, thanks.
The only problem with that is they're not competing against each other, they're actually on the same team with a common goal, which is to clear out the massive corruption, criminal fraud and abuse in gov't.
I hope that helps.
The common goal is power. There's not room for two kings.
I hope that helps.
It's almost impossible to be stupid enough to think that Trump wasn't asking for fraudulent votes and still be able to read and write.
How exactly do you think Trump expected them to fabricate fraudulent votes and then get away with it considering he must have known the phone call was being recorded?
They would be the most scrutinized votes in history.
Of course the answer is he didn't. He was asking them to find legitimate votes, not fabricate votes.
Georgia had already been recounted and the election results confirmed over a month earlier. There would be no other potential source for 11k new votes besides fraud.
If Trump was capable of knowing that the phone call was likely being recorded he was also capable of knowing that you can't just "find" tens of thousands of uncounted votes... and knowing the call was likely recorded is why he used the word "find" instead of "fabricate".
We aren't talking about a set of car keys. How does one go about "finding" thousands of previously undiscovered legitimate votes? What does that process look like in your mind? If you had been on the other end of the phone, and you had wanted to comply with Trump's instructions, what would you have done?
How exactly do you think Trump expected them to fabricate fraudulent votes and then get away with it considering he must have known the phone call was being recorded?
They would be the most scrutinized votes in history.
Of course the answer is he didn't. He was asking them to find legitimate votes, not fabricate votes.
I know you're just trolling, bruh, but y'alls cried on and on about how the Dems were dumping ballots in the middle of the night, pulling out suitcases of Biden ballots from under tables, changing ballots at polling stations, etc., so I'm fully sure you're creative enough to figure out a way for a Secretary of State to "find" some more votes for Trump.
I don't know. There are plenty of places boxes of votes could have been lost, misplaced or gone astray. Either deliberately or accidentally.
How exactly do you think Trump expected them to fabricate fraudulent votes and then get away with it considering he must have known the phone call was being recorded?
They would be the most scrutinized votes in history.
Of course the answer is he didn't. He was asking them to find legitimate votes, not fabricate votes.
If he was asking for something legitimate he would have done so publicly. If he wanted a favor like extra votes or an announcement of a sham investigation into an opponent he would have done so secretly and only admitted to doing it when outed. 99.9% of people will admit that what trump did is wrong 99.9% if the time. The only known example in US history where anybody will say it’s ok is specifically Trump, Georgia 2020. If Trump got outed doing it in other places you’d magically be fine with them also.
DOGE has already found 4.7 Trillion dollars of our money that was unaccounted for, untraceable and transferred right into a black hole. They had the system rigged, no wonder why they tried so hard to keep Trump and Musk out of office.
This has to be the biggest travesty in our countries history but the clueless libs can't see this and turn a blind eye to it while they're still chanting "hey-hey! ho-ho! Elon Musk has got to go!" (he ain't goin no where folks).
DOGE has already found 4.7 Trillion dollars of our money that was unaccounted for, untraceable and transferred right into a black hole. They had the system rigged, no wonder why they tried so hard to keep Trump and Musk out of office.
This has to be the biggest travesty in our countries history but the clueless libs can't see this, bc they're still chanting "hey-hey! ho-ho! Elon Musk has got to go!" (he ain't goin no where folks).
Nothing in the article said anything about finding any unaccounted for missing money. It said it found transactions that had a blank where there should've been an identifier. Learn to read.
And then learn not to believe everything you read just because it makes you feel good.
If he was asking for something legitimate he would have done so publicly. If he wanted a favor like extra votes or an announcement of a sham investigation into an opponent he would have done so secretly and only admitted to doing it when outed. 99.9% of people will admit that what trump did is wrong 99.9% if the time. The only known example in US history where anybody will say it’s ok is specifically Trump, Georgia 2020. If Trump got outed doing it in other places you’d magically be fine with
He did do it publicly. The phone call was recorded. He knew it would likely be released to the public at some stage.
Nothing in the article said anything about finding any unaccounted for missing money. It said it found transactions that had a blank where there should've been an identifier. Learn to read.
And then learn not to believe everything you read just because it makes you feel good.
When you send out money with no record of who it was sent to, I'm sorry to inform you but the money becomes unaccounted for. Learn to understand.
When you send out money with no record of who it was sent to, I'm sorry to inform you but the money becomes unaccounted for. Learn to understand.
The article ALSO did not say that happened. Take your own advice, bud.
The transactions were missing this:
The transactions were reportedly missing the Treasury Account Symbol (TAS), an identification code which links a Treasury payment to a budget line item, according to DOGE, which described the use of such code as a “standard financial process.”
Literally learn to read. NOWHERE does it say the money was unaccounted for, missing, or had an unknown recipient. You made all of that up. The headline exaggerated its importance ("CRITICAL ITEM") and the article claimed it was almost impossible to trace without it, but EXPLICITLY FAILED TO MENTION THAT IT WAS STILL TRACED JUST FINE WITHOUT IT.
Funny that. There's a reason they did that. You are the reason.
When you send out money with no record of who it was sent to, I'm sorry to inform you but the money becomes unaccounted for. Learn to understand.
Funny how accounted is so important to define it is not fraud for you now but when it was trump doing it and got convicted for it -> Nono it isn’t fraud , anyway isn’t that important 0o.
10s of millions of fraudulent social security recipients is the claim
10s of millions
So, like... 20-40?
So their claim is that 1/3rd to 2/3rds of all social security receipts are fraudulent?
Does that sound absolutely ******ed to anyone else?
It's fine. When you're auditing, being out by a magnitude of x1000 is super-standard.
This is what happens when you move fast, you get things wrong. Nobody bats 1,000. The American people are a patient and intelligent bunch who can sus out such improprieties and wont be swayed by irresponsible reporting