Superuser Caught on GGPoker - "MoneyTaker69" Thread

Superuser Caught on GGPoker - "MoneyTaker69" Thread

User "MoneyTaker69" is alleged to be superusing on GG Poker.

In December, Moneytaker won at 90bb/100 on GG Poker in 8,900

29 December 2023 at 01:23 AM
Reply...

352 Replies


Earlier posts are available on our legacy forum HERE

by Cloven

There cannot be any revolutionary math stats technique here that's gona add any insight, and I'll say why.When you combine an insane statistical anomaly, with observerations that are completely independent of the math-like someone calling down with jack high, no amount of pure math is going to beat common sense, and basic reasoning here, and some simple simulation/statistics. Y

Except i did post the statistical method. See this post: https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showp...

MM


by cAmmAndo

So this is what I have wondered since the Pot Ripper days.In manufacturing, we use statistics for continuous monitoring of processes. Certain (out of control) “signals” drive actions. We have a series of actions for that process we call an OCAP or out of control action plan. The plan is appropriate for the process. But there are 8 generally accepted “rules” all based on STandar

And this is exactly my point. I suspect that the main reason sites don't, as far as I know, do much of this is that the important managers of the site aren't familiar with these ideas. If they were, much of this stuff would be flagged for further review.

Mason


by JackSpratt

Oh right forgot that all poker sites are supposed to check their techniques with you. As far as you know = you don't know anything.

You're right, I don't know. But I strongly suspect that if they understood and implemented the right statistical techniques, there's a good chance this thread wouldn't exist.

Mason


by Cloven

All of the people making fun of the book promotion and secret stats knowledge are well justified in doing so. Also whats up with people who sign their name at the end of every post. Your name is already visible in the profile.

Mason is in his 70’s and is about as old school poker as you can get. It’s ok to disagree or whatever but how about you show a little respect bro, you’re being bit a d1ck.

My 2cents on the topic is; blatant cheating occurred.


So far this scandal is sweeping under the rug quite nicely for GG Poker it seems...


by AllBlackDan

So far this scandal is sweeping under the rug quite nicely for GG Poker it seems...

I might be overly optimistic by saying this: not necessarily.

The AP/Potripper scandal also took a while to really gain wider traction. If memory serves, there were suspicions well before Marco Johnson finished second to Potripper on that 10-high call. And even after that, the story developed slowly. Sure, there was a hand history on 2+2 soon after, but it was at least a week before Marco received what became an incriminating file. Plus, Nat Arem, Snagglepuss, et al took at least a few days to dismantle said file.

I can't find the old 2+2 forum archives, but this is still around to illustrate the spotlight on the subject:
• Steven Levitt's first post about the Potripper scandal (Sept. 20, 2007): https://freakonomics.com/2007/09/how-not...
• Levitt's second post (Oct. 17, 2007): https://freakonomics.com/2007/10/the-abs...

That right there indicates more a full month from the Potripper call against CrazyMarco (12 Sept 2007) to the second Levitt article, the KGC "investigation," Todd Witteles' phone conversations, major media attention, etc.

TL;DR it might be swept under the rug in the same way AP thought they had buried the Potripper issue with their "we found no evidence" post a week after the pivotal tournament. So the same could happen here. Fingers crossed, sir.


by JackSpratt

Read this page from them if you want a good laugh. How has the PIC not issued a statment about this case? Wait, how have they not done ANYTHING since this was announced?

https://www.ggpoker.com/poker-integrity-...

[QUOTE=GG PIC]We are actively seeking to expand our PIC Voting Members for diverse representation and to maintain independence and neutrality. Please get in touch with GGPoker or Jason Koon if you wish to apply to be a PIC Voting Member.[/QUOTE]

Seems like they need a statistical analysis expert on the team - anybody know one?


They know about behavioral analytics AI. It's just better for business for them to funnel money into marketing and hire lots of influencer shills. No one is depositing money because GG has a new advanced anti cheating AI but they might join up if some shill tells them to.


by jayme87

yeah i think this gg cheating councel needs its own thread, they do nothing, fedor busy flirting on game of gold, jason got a baby, they all too rich to care, we need a proper councel, not some known pros just because they are well known and win at poker, doesn't auto make them good at anything to do with looking into cheats/scandals

The sites won't do what they really need to do.

1. Hire former prosecutors and former high quality investigators, who;
2. Understand poker; and
3. Give them the latitude to engage (hire) the experts necessary to any investigation (statisticians, programmers, etc.).

There's nothing here that's unsolvable with the right people doing the work.

Hiring poker names is foolish window dressing. The best people for this work are people you've never heard of.


Can anyone tell me how these people open so many fake accounts? Even depositing and withdrawing?

Yet GG want proof of address and bank statements from me. How do they get around that security check?

Or do they all VPN from Unregulated countries? So GG don’t care?


by Tutejszy

I'm not fully caught up with the thread yet, but I just wanted to point out one thing: if this means that GG loses its dominant market position, it was likely the best thing that could happen to online poker.

What alternative site do you see taking the leadership position that represents an improvement for online poker?


GG may be able to improve its security and clean up this sort of thing. However, if it turns out there were a lot of superusers or they were connected to insiders, then it might be a problem. I doubt they don't clean it up and maintain their market position.


by Punker

What alternative site do you see taking the leadership position that represents an improvement for online poker?

Stars obviously has a better rep than any other site. Software and interface seem lightyears ahead of other sites (except for the problems with Aurora). Of course no site is perfect ... and Stars is not an exception.

Any site with lower rake taking leadership is better.


People are paranoid that GG will somehow sweep this under the rug and allow it to continue to go on. They are going to have to take major action to clean up their games.


by deuceblocker

People are paranoid that GG will somehow sweep this under the rug and allow it to continue to go on. They are going to have to take major action to clean up their games.

Probably. Imagine another no-brainer security hole being found out after significant money is already lost. Then it may explode, and they know it.


I wonder if any of the other suspicious accounts with crazy high win-rates have any big MTT scores in the past 6 months, too bad we cant check Sharkscope… Is there another site that possibly tracks MTT scores on GG poker?


by Wilbury Twist

I might be overly optimistic by saying this: not necessarily. The AP/Potripper scandal also took a while to really gain wider traction. If memory serves, there were suspicions well before Marco Johnson finished second to Potripper on that 10-high call. And even after that, the story developed slowly. Sure, there was a hand history on 2+2 soon after, but it was at least a week b

They were days, though, when many of the finest minds in poker were active on a forum like this and saw value in providing their thoughts and/or time to discuss a scandal like Potripper publicly.

I would imagine there is more advanced knowledge and conversation happening on this amongst midstakes+ regs with the knowledge and visibility to tease this one out, but it is happening in private discords and the likes.

I think it is highly unlikely such an exploit was only identified and used by this particular player, and I would say the presence of such an exploit and the botched response (the hacker being able to continue after a software fix was released, the attempt to bury the official statement with subsequent blogs) raise serious questions around the integrity of games on GG Poker. The compelling analysis in this thread around abnormal win rates and likely chip dumping adds to a sense of GG Poker not having the capability or interest to address game integrity issues seriously.

In my opinion, this is likely worse than the Absolute Poker event, where it was an instance of naked theft from an insider. Technical capability issues allied to an underresourced or unempowered fraud/game integrity function are much more concerning in the modern era of RTA. I just doubt that the most impactful discussion of these implications will happen in this space in 2024.

Finally, it's naive to think that pro players are blind to the trade-offs of playing on a site like GG Poker. Balancing security with the availability of action is one of the most fundamental aspects of the history of playing poker for money since its inception. It's nothing new...


by GGcare

Tried to summarize it all, cause #GGcare 😃MoneyTaker69 exploited a vulnerability in the software, which made it possible for him to see the equity in real-time. He wouldnÂ’t see the hole cards of the other players, but heÂ’d always know his chance of winning the hand. Simply put, the server would know what cards the other players were holding, itÂ’d calculate the equity based

To add to the ever-growing list:
- GG have still to publish any info about the incident on their local sites. In other words, they don't consider it significant enough of an incident to share the info with the wider network. It's not a huge surprise they'd try to bury it as much as possible and not make it a thing in jurisdictions where the regulators might want to look further into it (Isle of Man and Kahnawake are complete jokes and don't care about player protection).
- GG are still to publish further clarifications (realistically, it probably won't happen). It's just as much about what wasn't said. GG have not confirmed, that this is an isolated incident. They say that they "spotted abnormal game client packets", and if it was the case that server side didn't constantly make the equity available (call from client to server needed to calculate), then surely GG would be able to identify whether additional abuse has taken place? Why is there no confirmation that such hasn't happened? It could of course be the case that GG were stupid enough to constantly have equity available server side, and there would be no way to identify abuse in server logs. Or, it could be that it isn't an isolated incident and GG will sweep it under the rug.


Who is Mason?


by bigdog63

Who is Mason?

An OG of poker.

Despite him coming across a bit poorly here, theres no doubt he has more knowledge about statistics and poker than 99% of the dunces in this thread.


by Kebabkungen

An OG of poker.

Despite him coming across a bit poorly here, theres no doubt he has more knowledge about statistics and poker than 99% of the dunces in this thread.

Aha! That guy.
Thanks


looks like interest around this episode is rapidly disappearing, besides this thread you don't see much mention of it. The integrity council faces have all been completely silent, inexplicable huge lack of professionalism, are they that desperate to get a few more pennies from GG? GG seems to have managed to bury the scandal without much damage


Can someone post a list of PLO winners? For me GG seemed like a site impossible to win even with all the massive whales jamming no look all ins.


Main takeaway from this for me is that everyone on the GG "Poker Integrity Council" are a bunch of douchebag morons.


If there is definite evidence of money laundering the UK gambling commission need to be told. they have handed out substantial fines before to companies

Reply...