Israel/Palestine thread

Israel/Palestine thread

Think this merits its own thread...

Discuss my fellow 2+2ers..

AM YISRAEL CHAI.

[QUOTE=Crossnerd]

07 October 2023 at 09:33 PM
Reply...

43274 Replies


Earlier posts are available on our legacy forum HERE

by metsandfinsfan

Yet an hour ago you blamed only jews. And when i call you out you then say yeah hamas sucks too

I expect this from victor

Well, I do say Hamas sucks and I've said it a dozen time itt, so maybe you should shut the **** up *******.


Engaging with Mets isn’t worth catching a ban over imo. He’s just a baby.


by microbet

"No blame of Hamas" You are such a totalitarian. A Maoist in a struggle session. You are the exact mirror of what you think Victor is.Yes, Hamas is to blame as well. So is Arafat and Clinton and Hitler and Muhammed. A big part of why things have been getting progressively worse in Israel is because the right wing idiots who think like you over there have been the most power

Here is what you said

Show me again how any person who sees this as blaming only Israel is racist

Here

October 7th happened because of right wing idiots
doing things like stopping the peace plan, assassinating Rabin, and then building walls and isolating the population of Gaza.

Did Gazans assanate rabin? Or build walls?
You are referring to Israel

There could have been peace for a generation now, but because of war criminals like Netanyahu

Am i racist to think when you said netenyahu you meant sinwar too?

there can't be peace for at least another generation going forward. More Jews will die because of the AI directed bombing campaign.

Who's AI campaign

You calling me racist for calling you put for your blaming this all on Israel is this post but your excuse is "i was thinking of Hamas too you dumb right wing racist"

Again

Clownshoes


And of course I never ever ever said Jews you goddamn piece of ****. I said the Prime Minister of the State of Israel you bootlicker.


Everybody needs to have a snack and a 5 minute break


by Crossnerd

Engaging with Mets isn’t worth catching a ban over imo. He’s just a baby.

Hall monitors gonna hall monitor. I don't care about bans. But thanks. I appreciate your posts itt.


by microbet

Hall monitors gonna hall monitor. I don't care about bans. But thanks. I appreciate your posts itt.

Yeah but the thread is unreadable for me without you in it, so it’s a selfish ask really


by microbet

Removing the settlements in 2005 was a bit like the demand for Hamas to be destroyed in the war right now. I don't expect numbskulls to understand this, but disengagement from Gaza and the walls have been a bigger problem than settlements were. Was Israel really trying for peace with Gaza with the withdrawal or was it part of setting up conditions for a permanent war?Remove t

Moronotron

Israel withdrew in 2005 and THERE WAS NO BLOCKADE

the blockade started in 2007 WHEN HAMAS TOOK OVER WITH THE INTENTION OF DESTROYING ISRAEL

Egypt ALSO BLOCKADED BECAUSE THEY KNEW HOW EVIL HAMAS WAS FROM THE BROTHERHOOD

So stop lying Victor JUNIOR

Israel was not planning to blockade gaza with a friendly government. Neither was Egypt

Both isreal and Egypt care about their citizens so they both made a decision

Read a book


by Crossnerd

Engaging with Mets isn’t worth catching a ban over imo. He’s just a baby.

he expresses what the overwhelming majority of Zionists think. its fascinating to see a country so fully indoctrinated.


Jesus, stop escalating with the all caps. Chill out bros


by metsandfinsfan

Am i racist to think when you said netenyahu you meant sinwar too?

Funny here how Netanyahu bears responsibility for Sinwar. Remember?

https://www.timesofisrael.com/for-years-...



why do they love murdering children so much? this bloodlust will be studied in future years.


Here I'll google some stuff for you



They withdrew in August 2005
Blockade started June 2007
Why?
Because Hamas took over and continously fired rockets at Israel

But what about Egypt?


So no, Israel didn't withdraw from gaza with a plan to blockade it and be at war with it. That's what antisemites and ignoramuses say


"everybody is guilty" means no one is guilty.

sides aren't equal. any claim they are, is antisemitism. Jews have been victim of insane attempts to genocide them in that area. they won against all odds then the west decided to help them.

nothing will change the objective truth of them having a right to be there without any ****er having any right to even suggest they shouldn't be there.

people who call themselves palestinian (an invented pseudo ethnic group with no actual common ancestors, a made up ethnicity) are lucky to be alive. They should thank Israel for not having killed every one of their recent ancestors as they fully were justified to do, when they tried to send them "back from the river to the sea".


by metsandfinsfan

So no, Israel didn't withdraw from gaza with a plan to blockade it and be at war with it. That's what antisemites and ignoramuses say

I said disengagement was a recipe for disaster, mentioned the building of walls which started before 2005, never said 'blockade' and I said that you were too dumb to understand what I meant and then you proceeded to demonstrate how I was right about that.


by Luciom

"everybody is guilty" means no one is guilty.sides aren't equal. any claim they are, is antisemitism. Jews have been victim of insane attempts to genocide them in that area. they won against all odds then the west decided to help them.nothing will change the objective truth of them having a right to be there without any ****er having any right to even suggest they shouldn't be

Again mets, the logical conclusion of your posts. Thank goodness for Luciom being here.


They withdrew in August 2005
Blockade started June 2007
Why?
Because Hamas took over and continously fired rockets at Israel

rofl. Hamas did not "take over". they won a free and fair election. then they were attacked by the Israeli backed PLO and won a civil war. Israel blockaded bc their chosen capos were not able to run Gaza.


The main reason I have not formed an opinion about this subject that I don't know how badly Israelis have been treating Palestinians over the last several years. Assuming the badness ratings of the Holocaust is 100, American slavery is 80, South African apartheid is 60 and the South in 1855 is 50, what would be the treatment of Palestinians be (not counting recently of course)?


by David Sklansky

The main reason I have not formed an opinion about this subject that I don't know how badly Israelis have been treating Palestinians over the last several years. Assuming the badness ratings of the Holocaust is 100, American slavery is 80, South African apartheid is 60 and the South in 1855 is 50, what would be the treatment of Palestinians be (not counting recently of course)?

holocaust being 100, american slavery is 60, apartheid is 25, south in 1855 is 10, palestinians is like 3


by David Sklansky

The main reason I have not formed an opinion about this subject that I don't know how badly Israelis have been treating Palestinians over the last several years. Assuming the badness ratings of the Holocaust is 100, American slavery is 80, South African apartheid is 60 and the South in 1855 is 50, what would be the treatment of Palestinians be (not counting recently of course)?

On that scale how badly did the English treat the American colonies?


by microbet

Again mets, the logical conclusion of your posts. Thank goodness for Luciom being here.

Again inserting my name where it doesn't belong

Good job


by Victor

rofl. Hamas did not "take over". they won a free and fair election. then they were attacked by the Israeli backed PLO and won a civil war. Israel blockaded bc their chosen capos were not able to run Gaza.

Wait Israel backed the plo and wanted hamas in power!! Shizo


by metsandfinsfan

Again inserting my name where it doesn't belong

Good job

Stupid baby,

You mention me in posts to other people 10 times for every time I've done the same to you.


Waah

Reply...