ex-President Trump
I assume it's still acceptable to have a Trump thread in a Politics forum?
So this is an obvious lie - basically aimed at
DJT down almost 70% since the IPO date
Gee. That’s too bad
IIRC isn't the date that he's allowed to sell coming up? Wasn't there a theory that the price was going to get artificially boosted by donors shortly before this? I've been toying around the idea of buying a position at some point expecting that to occur so I can ride the wave too.
IIRC Sept 20 is D-day (Dump day).
As soon as word gets out that he's unloading (assuming he will at some point), look out below!
His recent posting on twitter isn't gonna help the truth social price.
Tweeting UNCONTROLLABLY
I’m not sure how many posters you think watch the YouTube’s you post but I’ll take the under.
Just say what you want to say. It’s not like you are Montreal who most posters don’t understand half the **** he says.
I forget that people actually watch YouTube soliloquies
I’m not sure how many posters you think watch the YouTube’s you post but I’ll take the under.
Just say what you want to say. It’s not like you are Montreal who most posters don’t understand half the **** he says.
That would explain a lot of things on why you see the world has u see it 😀 ..
Understanding and seeing reality has it is is not given to everyone I suppose .
according to Politico, the actual drafters of Trump transition plan and of an eventual future Trump admin plan are the America first policy institute people, not the heritage foundation guys
They may not be on his transition team (for now) but they helped write his platform.
In May, the Trump campaign and the RNC announced their Platform Committee leadership team, the senior officials tasked with drafting the Republican platform, and named Russ Vought as the platform committee's policy director and Ed Martin as deputy policy director. Both have ties to Project 2025.
Vought, who previously served Trump as the director of the Office of Management and Budget, authored a chapter on "Executive Office of the President" for Project 2025's "Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise," which Project 2025 describes as "a comprehensive policy guide for the next conservative U.S. president."
Vought's Center For Renewing America is also listed as a member of Project 2025's advisory board, according to the plan's website.
What normal human being stands at a gravestone of a dead soldier posing for a photo smiling giving a thumbs up?
Any other person that did the actions that Trump did at the Arlington National Cemetery would be universally condemned. The Republican Party doesn’t deserve power, even if you agree with them more politically. There is no low they won’t stoop to.
Yeah that one baffled me as well . Though he wasn't the only one smiling . Maybe the family asked for the photo?
he's always been weird about dead soldiers https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/05/politics/...
he's always been weird about dead soldiers https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/05/politics/...
I thought at least you were immune to Lincoln project lies
i believe it was written about in fire and fury where either the author witnessed that directly or got it from staffers as well
if it was made up then i apologize, but this one definitely felt like there were multiple sources on it and it definitely tracks with his general me me me me and "i hate losers" stuff
i believe it was written about in fire and fury where either the author witnessed that directly or got it from staffers as well
if it was made up then i apologize, but this one definitely felt like there were multiple sources on it and it definitely tracks with his general me me me me and "i hate losers" stuff
as per your link it was all based on completely unproven allegations by people who hate him
as per your link it was all based on completely unproven allegations by people who hate him
agreed that there's no indisputable evidence but enough people who worked for him had terrible things to say about him and often said these things to the journalists he allowed to be embedded with them and sit in on meetings
i love how in fire and fury when he's relaying meeting transcripts at times it'll be like
staffer - "so what do you think we should do about syria?"
general - "i'm sorry, but why the f is this jounalist here in the meeting room with us?"
trump - "he's going to write a book about this"
staffer - "but why is he here sitting in on this meeting?"
trump - "it's ok he's a good guy"
i strongly suggest you read fire and fury and fear - great books, if you dm me i'll happily send you a link to download the audiobooks from a dropbox if you like
i believe it was written about in fire and fury where either the author witnessed that directly or got it from staffers as well
if it was made up then i apologize, but this one definitely felt like there were multiple sources on it and it definitely tracks with his general me me me me and "i hate losers" stuff
When CNN refers to multiple sources . It may be that MSNBC reported it from unnamed sources than the View reports it based on MSNBC's report and than John Oliver reports it based on the View and MSNBC . So now CNN will report it based on multiple sources which are MSNBC, John Oliver and the View even though the story is false
WHY DO YOU LIARS ONLY LIE?!?!?!??!
Spoiler
GENOCIDE!!!!!!!!!!
When CNN refers to multiple sources . It may be that MSNBC reported it from unnamed sources than the View reports it based on MSNBC's report and than John Oliver reports it based on the View and MSNBC . So now CNN will report it based on multiple sources which are MSNBC, John Oliver and the View even though the story is false
it's like when fat studies PhDs peer review each other paper
When CNN refers to multiple sources . It may be that MSNBC reported it from unnamed sources than the View reports it based on MSNBC's report and than John Oliver reports it based on the View and MSNBC . So now CNN will report it based on multiple sources which are MSNBC, John Oliver and the View even though the story is false
No. In that case they would say multiple reports.
