Moderation Questions

Moderation Questions

The last iteration of the moderation discussion thread was a complete disaster. Numerous attempts to keep it on topic failed, and it became a general discussion thread with almost no moderation related posts at all. And those that were posted were so buried in non-mod posts that it became a huge time drain on the mods to sort through them. Then, when off topic posts were deleted posters complained about that.

This led to the closing of the mod discussion thread, replaced by the post report/pm approach. This has filtered out lots of noise, but has resulted at times in the General Discussion Thread turning into a quasi-mod thread. This is not desirable, but going back to the old mod thread is also not a workable option.

Therefore, I have created this new moderation thread, but with a different purpose and ground rules than previous mod threads. The purpose of this thread is to provide a place for posters to pose questions to the mods about how policies are applied; to bring to the mods attention posts they think are inappropriate and reach the level of requiring mod action; and for mods to communicate to posters things like changes or clarifications to policies, bannings, etc.

Now let me tell you what this thread is NOT a place for. It is not for nonmoderation related posts, even if the discussion originates from a comment in in a mod related post. It is not for posters to post their opinions about other posters or whether a poster should be banned. It is not to rehash past grievances about mod decisions from months or years ago. The focus of this thread will be recent posts that require action now. Or questions about current policies and enforcement.

So basically, this is a thread to ask mods questions. Which means, pretty much that only mods should be answering those questions. If a poster asks why a particular post was deleted or allowed, only a mod can answer that. Everyone else who wants to jump in with their opinion or their mod war story needs to stay out of it. It just increases the noise to signal ratio and does nothing to answer the question.

Everyone needs to understand that this thread has very different rules than the old mod thread and any other thread. Any non-moderation post will be deleted on sight. Not moved to the appropriate thread, just deleted. So don't waste your time crafting a masterpiece post about wars or transgender issues or the presidential election and then post it in this thread. It will be gone. Also, this isnt a thread for general commentary about our mods performance. Posting "browser sucks as a mod" or any such posts that don't actually ask about a policy or request a mod action will be deleted. Everyone is entitled to their opinion about the moderation of this forum. But this thread isnt for complaining about mods. You are free to go to the ATF forum and make your concerns about modding in this forum there.

So with that intro, this thread is open for those who need to bring questions about mod policies or bring inappropriate posts to the mods attention. Again, it is NOT a thread for group discussions about other posters or for other posters to answer questions directed to mods.

We'll see how this goes. If you have what you feel is an open issue raised in the General Discussion Thread, please copy that post or otherwise reintroduce the issue here.

Thanks.

) 11 Views 11
30 January 2024 at 05:27 AM
Reply...

8980 Replies

5
w


by checkraisdraw k

True story. It wasn’t useful because socrates was a raging homosexual

"Raging" homosexual? There's a slur I thought went out with the 1980s.


by jalfrezi k

"Raging" homosexual? There's a slur I thought went out with the 1980s.

would you prefer the term dogshit homosexual instead because that appears to be a-ok


socrates was also the first professional twice over as both an analyst and a therapist


by jalfrezi k

"Raging" homosexual? There's a slur I thought went out with the 1980s.

why are you assuming I’m not gay 😵


socrates would never have confused "So you don't really know if it's true or not" with "If what you want to tell me is neither True nor ..."

less significantly, I think he was dead


by chezlaw k

less significantly, I think he was dead

[quote=Wiki]
Along with his teacher Socrates, and Aristotle, his student, Plato is a central figure in the history of Western philosophy.
[/quote]


Socrates died 399 BC

Diogenes born 412 or 404 BC


A it earlier than I thought but still pushing it


by chezlaw k

Socrates died 399 BC


A it earlier than I thought but still pushing it

They were precocious kids back in those days.


by checkraisdraw k

True story. It wasn’t useful because socrates was a raging homosexual

Not incompatible with him having a wife and kids.


by d2_e4 k

They were precocious kids back in those days.

you gave chez way more credit than i did, i thought he forgot about the order


by rickroll k

you gave chez way more credit than i did, i thought he forgot about the order

Hmm. Wasn't giving him credit, just didn't occur to me that he could have got that wrong lol.


by Trolly McTrollson k

Not incompatible with him having a wife and kids.

That was the joke ^^;;


You even managed to think I didn't know plato and socrates wete about together.

A true genius


by checkraisdraw k

That was the joke ^^;;

what can you say, some people have dogshit levels of reading comprehension


by chezlaw k

You even managed to think I didn't know plato and socrates wete about together.

A true genius

Underestimating your intellectual ability is never an EV mistake. You deliver on target far more often than not.


Very wise to value satisfaction above reality


valuing satisfaction above reality wete about together


Well said


by rickroll k

what can you say, some people have dogshit levels of reading comprehension

Look, you did it!

Can we not be mad now pleaseee 😀


by rickroll k

what can you say, some people have dogshit levels of reading comprehension

a lot of times people just dont even read it and make their own fantasy. that, or they are just act intentionally obtuse. but that is ofc the bad faith required to support the status quo and Democrat party.


by rickroll k

i'd say he was more of a transcendentalist homosexual

Ancient Greek ideas about male homosexuality were quite different than modern ideas.

Critics viewed homosexual sex between men more as licentious than perverse.


roc please be courteous and don't use fancy words and make me look them up in the future

idk much about the greeks but for the romans so long as you were the top it wasn't considered a problem - elagabulus' main problem wasn't that he was banging his charioteer, but he made it clear to all he was the one getting banged

also, that post was a poor attempt at a play on raging


by rickroll k

roc please be courteous and don't use fancy words and make me look them up in the future

idk much about the greeks but for the romans so long as you were the top it wasn't considered a problem - elagabulus' main problem wasn't that he was banging his charioteer, but he made it clear to all he was the one getting banged

also, that post was a poor attempt at a play on raging

It's not gay if you don't push back.


so only power bottoms are gay?


by rickroll k

so only power bottoms are gay?

Hey man, I don't make the rules.

Reply...