In other news
In the current news climate we see that some figures and events tend to dominate the front-pages heavily. Still, there a
the exact stock price was a joke but the ballpark was there, in the "oops I might be overpaying" phase in 2022, musk anyway tried to offer 31 , then 39 billions (instead of the first promised, and then fulfilled, 44) so that was approx what it would have needed to pay to take it anyway even with no joking
What's 13 billion between friends?
When he bought it my understanding was most people in the know thought the offer price was way too high. Maybe there was some optimism by Cult of Musk disciples he would do some financial magic and make it a +EV investment, but it looks like the people saying this were right. Of course, who knows what was offered to his investment partners (such as the Saudi's) behind the sce
price was high-ish but not unusual to overpay in hostile takeovers.
Twitter itself is saddled with the debt required to buy it and that costs a lot to service (especially these days compared to 2022) and that's a significant part of the decline in value of the equity stake in Twitter itself.
yes I agree that there are future scenarios where some events could make twitter value jump a lot higher, but also scenarios where it could go to 0 if political enemies of tusk (and he has many these days) manage to accomplish what they want
Facebook social media don't censor pro Hezbollah and pro Hamas content and the advertisers who quit Twitter all advertise there, and there is nothing more antisemitic than pro Hamas and pro Hezbollah content.
Do their adverts appear next to this content? IIRC it wasn't about what the rest of the platform was doing, it was about where their adverts were appearing, and the general public backlash.
In other Musk related news, the richest man on earth claims the party he is supporting is the party of the people, unlike the other party which is the party of the rich.
This seems bad - though I have to imagine there'd be an outrage among the conservative slappies if FoxNews tried this
In other Musk related news, the richest man on earth claims the party he is supporting is the party of the people, unlike the other party which is the party of the rich.
You’re an odd guy Luciom but truuuuuuue
In other Musk related news, the richest man on earth claims the party he is supporting is the party of the people, unlike the other party which is the party of the rich.
For sure the rich wouldn’t vote for the party benefiting them ?
No wonder so many people are poor believing crap like that .
10 most poor states in the U.S. ? Republicans !
Yes republicans the party for the people lol …
For sure the rich wouldn’t vote for the party benefiting them ?
No wonder so many people are poor believing crap like that .
10 most poor states in the U.S. ? Republicans !
Yes republicans the party for the people lol …
depends what you mean with poor.
Going with poverty rates, some are very democratic
Democrats try pass a bill from the most conservative members on border bill and they still rejected it ….
What more u want democrats to do ?
Countless time republicans congress and senators votes against theirs constituents interest just because it came from democrats or bi partisanship ….
If you can’t even acknowledge that I can’t see what else we can speak about …
And to think democrats are the party for the rich while they want to taxed them more?
Lol….
Democrats try pass a bill from the most conservative members on border bill and they still rejected it ….What more u want democrats to do ?Countless time republicans congress and senators votes against theirs constituents interest just because it came from democrats or bi partisanship ….If you can’t even acknowledge that I can’t see what else we can speak about …And to think
Not sure how the border bill helps the poor?
I agree they should have passed the bill
Democrats try pass a bill from the most conservative members on border bill and they still rejected it ….What more u want democrats to do ?Countless time republicans congress and senators votes against theirs constituents interest just because it came from democrats or bi partisanship ….If you can’t even acknowledge that I can’t see what else we can speak about …And to think
Please don't spread propoganda and disinformation; that's what your controllers are doing. The President doesn't need a "border bill". When they came into office they immediatly reversed all of Trump's border polices without "congress's approval" which opened up the border and flooded the United States with millions of unknown, illegal immagrants that are being shipped out to cities all over the country. You don't have a problem with this? He can close the border without a bill, just like he opened it the second they came into office. Their "border bill" was full of billions of dollars to help other countries which they tried to sneak in. The Republicans would of signed a bill that was for the border, not for The United States of Ukraine.
Please don't spread propoganda and disinformation; that's what your controllers are doing. The President doesn't need a "border bill". When they came into office they immediatly reversed all of Trump's border polices without "congress's approval" which opened up the border and flooded the United States with millions of unknown, illegal immagrants that are being shipped out to c
Well we all know you don’t live in the same reality of us so I shouldn’t need to rectifyyour views but just for the sake of completeness…..for the millions times .
Not only it’s true but republicans rejected it twice this year !
Just to have some talkings points to try blame the democrats on something because what else would they have ?
They even make fake stories to link it at the borders because they have nothing much to say lol ….
https://amp.theguardian.com/us-news/arti...
Senate Republicans blocked a bipartisan border security bill for a second time, part of an attempt by Chuck Schumer to flip the script on immigration – a major political liability for Joe Biden and Democrats in this year’s election.
The 43-50 vote was far short of the necessary 60 votes needed to advance the legislation. Republicans, who have repeatedly demanded Democrats act on the border, abandoned the compromise proposal at the behest of Donald Trump who saw it was a political “gift” for Biden’s re-election chances.
But hey keep accusing others what you actually doing 100% of the time ….
Please don't spread propoganda and disinformation; that's what your controllers are doing. The President doesn't need a "border bill". When they came into office they immediatly reversed all of Trump's border polices without "congress's approval" which opened up the border and flooded the United States with millions of unknown, illegal immagrants that are being shipped out to c
The president can’t make appropriations to hire more agents and asylum judges without the consent of congress. Also you are completely full of crap about the Ukraine spending, that was split into a different bills and still passed. Can you at least make an effort to live in reality?
