ex-President Trump
I assume it's still acceptable to have a Trump thread in a Politics forum?
So this is an obvious lie - basically aimed at
this is that presidential x factor which kamala lacked, say what you will about joe, but the man wasn't afraid of speaking his mind back before he went full reagan
The case may or may not have been politically driven. It may or may not have had a biased judge and jury. But one thing is clear - you do not understand what a legal expense is.
First of all it was an internal entry in their books that was subpoenad not because a crime was being investigated, but to "find dirt" on Trump. When the AG ran for office, she literally campaigned saying "I'm gonna get Trump".
Second of all he sent the money to his lawyer which covered the payment and legal expenses in drawing up the NDA. What was he supposed to enter it as, a whore house payment?
And third of all, the statute they charged him with required him to hide this info (which he didn't) to conceal another crime which was non existent.
The other cases against him were also BS, especially the one where they charged him for overestimating the value of his property, Mar a Lago to apply for financing (which was fully paid back and the case had no victim or complainant except a lawyer who arbitrarily thought the property was worth less. They didn't even send an appraiser to determine this).
This same NY injustice system is now doing the same thing with their mayor for speaking out against all the illegal aliens (or what they call "asylum seekers") pouring into and ruining his city.
The people that can't see these things are all the ones who have a bias against "orange man" and don't care if he's treated fairly or not.
just saw Trump's not having any sentence, but stays a convicted felon.
I think I represent the rest of the world in saying: lol America.
I won't get into the rest of your little rant, but as to this
Second of all he sent the money to his lawyer which covered the payment and legal expenses in drawing up the NDA. What was he supposed to enter it as, a whore house payment?
Are you suggesting that if I have my lawyer pay my electric bill it is a legal expense? Also, are you aware that a single payment can be expensed to multiple ledger accounts? At best it was a miscellaneous expense, but if there were any company policies in place (doubtful) then it was too large to go there and either way such a large payment would need to be disclosed accurately. I'm not actually sure where I'd put it, but then again, I've never worked somewhere that this would be a proper use of company money.
What a patriot
Has so much evil been concentrated in a small area ever before?
I won't get into the rest of your little rant, but as to this Are you suggesting that if I have my lawyer pay my electric bill it is a legal expense? Also, are you aware that a single payment can be expensed to multiple ledger accounts? At best it was a miscellaneous expense, but if there were any company policies in place (doubtful) then it was too large to go there and either way such a large payment would need to be disclosed accurately. I'm not actually sure where I'd put it, but then again,
He legally paid her not to talk, via a contract prepared by lawyers.
What you and everyone's been missing is a government agency out of the blue shouldn't subpoena all your business records in a witch hunt looking for dirt on you. And furthermore, charge someone with 34 felony counts for listing money he sent to his lawyer as a legal expense.
The jail time he could of gotten for being convicted of 34 felonies is 50 to 100 years for this. You think this is justified? I don't, and neither does anyone else who can easily see this was politically motivated.
This is the attorney general who brought this case against him
Broken YouTube Link
HAHA
I didn't say 34 checks.
it was 34 checks and other forms of payments all to Cohen
/
Cohen would be paid in a series of monthly payments of $35,000 over the course of 2017. The first check was for $70,000, covering two months. Cohen sent an invoice to the Trump Organization for each check, portraying the payment as his "retainer." Every time he was paid, a bookkeeper generated a record for the company's files, known as a voucher, with the description "legal expense." The first three payments were made from Trump's trust, while the remaining nine came from his personal account.
Each of the 34 charges against Trump corresponded to a check, invoice and voucher generated to reimburse Cohen.
This is nonsensical. When I pay my credit card bill is it a credit card expense or is it expenses for all the things on the current bill, like gas and groceries? In your world, I could say I don't spend anything on gas or food and not be wrong. Many of your other points are worth a discussion, but always putting this one in overwhelms everything with idiocy.
This is nonsensical. When I pay my credit card bill is it a credit card expense or is it expenses for all the things on the current bill, like gas and groceries? In your world, I could say I don't spend anything on gas or food and not be wrong. Many of your other points are worth a discussion, but always putting this one in overwhelms everything with idiocy.
Whether you listed it as a gas bill or a credit card bill is irrelevant, just like it wouldn't matter if Trump listed the payments to Stormy as "hush money payment" or "legal expenses", do you think it's fair for your state's Attorney General to order you to fork over all of your financial records, and then charge you with a felony for listing a gas bill as a credit card bill?
Once again, you bury a decent point of discussion behind idiocy.
I would list it as a credit card payment, since it's no longer a payment for gas or groceries.
Once the NDA is executed and payments are being made it's now a legal expense instead of "shut stormy up money".
I rest my case.
/
