ex-President Trump

For the lolz!

https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showp...

https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showp...

Basically the "grab them by the pussy" part is too low pitched for Trump but it's also spoken with higher intensity (e.g. it's louder) than the other part of what he said.

Hes apologized profusely for the comments on at least 2 separate occasions and unequivocally admitted to the comment in a recorded deposition.

What are you even trying to do?

I'm only concerned with the actual audio recordings. What Trump has said about them doesn't factor in.

I used to get paid to take audio files and chop them up. I'm not an expert but I have looked at lots of them.

Just a little bit of this:

I didn't expect people would be happy about the inauguration, but I really didn't think there would be this much butthurt.

What was the point of the posts that I was responding to?

Don't worry about it, dude. As you said, "The interesting thing about the 'grab it by the pussy' thing" is definitely your theory about the audio being spliced. I'm sure no other point was being made at all.

Do you know how discussion is supposed to work?

Trump supporters only know the word butthurt and TDS.

Oh and for some reason "daddy."

So which of these executive actions is ending the war in Ukraine ("within the first 24 hours of taking office")?

Which one is going to bring down the price of eggs?

Gullible idiots.

Hey at least TikTok has been liberated

They will be disappointed.

Then they will be told they shouldn't be disappointed.

Then they will say "fine!" and be happy as ****ing clams. Gullible idiots are like that.

The Capitol rioters were very fine people!

Tourists, really.

Cool, thanks.

Where's your sufficient sample showing his other speech to compare pitch and volume to? You're not even using speech from even the previous sentence let alone anything sufficient from that conversation. Why would you do that?

Your dB map is 50-100 with at least half not being used by the data and only the 50 and 100 labeled and no other lines or numbers indicating volume. Why would you do that?

Your Hz graph is from 75 to 500, with 99.99% of the data located in the bottom 1/4 of the chart (only an obvious split second ambient noise hitting close to 500) with only 75 and 500 labeled and no numbers or lines to indicate a decent approximation of pitch.

Why would you do that? Even Purdue had a more clear graph when they were bamboozling doctors on the levels of Oxycontin in the blood over the course of 12 hours.

Okay, so your charts convinced me to inspect it more closely for shits and giggles.

If you import the data from when he says he's, "attracted to beautiful women - I just start," all of that is lower pitched than grab em by the pussy.

The pitches of "attracted to beautiful women - I just start" fluctuates between 102-106Hz and "grab 'em by the pussy" fluctuates between 113-120Hz.

So your smoking gun about his pussy grabbing being lower in pitch is actually higher in pitch than literally what he said 10 seconds prior.

Starting from, "You know I'm automatically attracted..." to after he says "grab 'em by the pussy," the highest pitch is 185Hz and the lowest pitch is 102Hz. This is not even outside of an octave range - nothing at all out of ordinary speech.

I won't even address the volume as that would be silly considering the fluctuation in pitch relative to volume is all in the same ballpark with the other parts of the conversation (that you left out that were just as low, or lower, and just as loud), and it wouldn't matter anyway because proximity source changes to a lapel mic and compressors being used.

Sorry, dude. Your boy just grabs chicks by the pussy.

Of course people would be upset when we could have been witnessing a historic presidency with the first Black female president in the history of the country becoming president today.

Instead, it’s another white male which has happened 46 out of 47 times. And it has been a male 47 out of 47 times.

Kamala would have been a very good president too. Hopefully she runs again because she never really got a fair shot.

sick troll

Why aren’t people happy that a billionaire man baby made a nazi size gaff on the global stage?

Or that our president insinuated he might invade Panama in his opening speech?

On a personal level Trump rescinded software assurance executive orders and in their place are 404s. Literally nothing to replace them, just broad scale wiping out of 4 years of advancement while government contractors are wondering wtf to do

LoL

Might have helped if she did interviews. Or talked to anyone about anything on camera.

Though to be fair it was her best play. She's what the French call 'les incompétents'

She did do interviews.

She was too loyal to Biden. That's fine, but don't expect to win the presidency when you're the vice president with a president that is polling low and you're saying there's nothing you can think of that he should have done differently.