President Donald Trump
I assume it's still acceptable to have a Trump thread in a Politics forum?
So this is an obvious lie - basically aimed at
It's funny how you all talked about me all day while I was out being productive.
tHe LeFt iS sO eAsY tO tRiGgEr
I was gonna ask what you do when you aren't in here but you are always in here. Don't you think it's kind of weird talking to anonymous guys all day? Do you ever take a break?
I get that the whole concept of doing things like walking and chewing gum at the same time will forever remain an elusive one for you to grasp, but take my word for it that it's possible to do other things while being, as you put it, "in here".
I get that the whole concept of doing things like walking and chewing gum at the same time will forever remain an elusive one for you to grasp, but take my word for it that it's possible to do other things while being, as you put it, "in here".
Well, when you aren't following me around what else do you do?
Write about you in my diary, update my scrapbook with the latest pictures of you, that sort of thing.
Lol if you think give enough of a **** about you to follow you around, you dumbass. I post in the threads that I post in, when you post in those threads I respond to you.
Write about you in my diary, update my scrapbook with the latest pictures of you, that sort of thing.
Lol if you think give enough of a **** about you to follow you around, you dumbass. I post in the threads that I post in, when you post in those threads I respond to you.
It's funny I knew just writing that top sentence was not enough. You were steaming and just had to add the last sentence. I'm gonna let you go now because I know how riled up you folks can get.
Have a great night.
Mongi
slow news day
It's funny I knew just writing that top sentence was not enough. You were steaming and just had to add the last sentence. I'm gonna let you go now because I know how riled up you folks can get.
Have a great night.
Mongi
Night night little mong, sleep well knowing how super triggered we all are now by your outstanding trolling talents.
I’m just gonna go on record that I don’t believe Brian James is married
I have been waiting for visuals like this for a while, we finally have it.
This is immigrants (foreign born), aged 25-64, by education in the listed countries.
The bars are the % out of total 25-64 immigrants.
When we try to tell you people that immigration in continental europe is dramatically different to the point that considerations that apply to the USA, canada and others don't apply for us at all, and denying that is bad faith, this is why.
More than 40% of foreign born 25-64 in Italy haven't even completed high school.
I have been waiting for visuals like this for a while, we finally have it.This is immigrants (foreign born), aged 25-64, by education in the listed countries.The bars are the % out of total 25-64 immigrants. When we try to tell you people that immigration in continental europe is dramatically different to the point that considerations that apply to the USA, canada and others d
What site is this from?
Chart supports the view that central Europe is riddled with institutional racism, more than Canada and the UK. US doesn't do too well either.
But for this to be meaningful you really need to compare with non-immigrants.
What site is this from?
Chart supports the view that central Europe is riddled with institutional racism, more than Canada and the UK. US doesn't do too well either.
But for this to be meaningful you really need to compare with non-immigrants.
Corriere della sera is one the biggest italian newspapers (center-left, think NYT more or less).
I don't understand why you think that data supports the view of "institutional racism" (???). I don't understand what you mean with your comment on the UK: 70% of the foreign born 25-64 in the UK have a college degree according to that chart.
I don't understand why you think it should be compared to non-immigrants. This is about "which kind of people are we importing?", and the answer is "dramatically different people depending on the country".
Btw the post-industrial economy has no place for people who aren't highly educated (unfortunately). It's almost impossible for them not to become warden of the state, ie a liability, thorought their life cycle (ie to cost more than they provide in taxes).
It's already a huge domestic political problem to deal with low education, low iq natives. The number of low education, low iq foreigners we should import is absolutely 0.
But that's just my opinion.
Facts though are that whatever finding about the effects of immigration you can have for canada and the uk, cannot be generalized to countries that import very different people. And cannot be used to claim ALL immigration is good, because it's obvious to almost anyone except some radical nativist that importing physicians is a net positive, but averaging their contribution with those who didn't complete high school is simply absurd.
It's a way to obfuscate the fact that importing the low skilled person to wash dishes in a restaurant kitchen is going to cost the country, to damage the country, even if the restaurant owner and it's customers will get a marginal benefit.
