President Donald Trump
I assume it's still acceptable to have a Trump thread in a Politics forum?
So this is an obvious lie - basically aimed at
I thought he was only convicted once, in Florida, on child-prostitution charges to which he pleaded guilty, and got just 13 months. Over ten years later, he died while on remand awaiting trial, this time on federal charges of sex-trafficking minors.
He was also on a work release program allowed to leave jail for 12 hours a day, 6 days a week.
Honestly the Epstein files are way overblown to me. Unless there is some independent evidence other than being on the flight logs the mere fact of being on the logs alone is not enough to infer that there is wrongdoing.
The whole point of the Epstein files in popular culture was so MAGAs could say anyone they don't like is a pedophile, going to be arrested soon and the proof is in secret files that we don't have yet. It obviously never made much sense because grad juries exist and the government is fully capable of arresting people without making publicly available all their evidence.
The whole point of the Epstein files in popular culture was so MAGAs could say anyone they don't like is a pedophile, going to be arrested soon and the proof is in secret files that we don't have yet. It obviously never made much sense because grad juries exist and the government is fully capable of arresting people without making publicly available all their evidence.
You do not find it suspicious that Jeffrey Epstein was charged than mysteriously hangs himself in his cell? Lets say he did and everything he knew died with him you still had . You think Ghislaine Maxwell information would lead to someone being charged.
Also after he was convicted or pled guilty to the original charge of having sex with a 14 year old I would assume the likes of Trump, Clinton and Gates wouldn't set foot near him .
This isn't Massachusetts Bay in the 1690s. People can just ignore your suspicions and lack of understanding of what they did. If the government has real evidence they should act on it.
Yes of course that's what he means, it's just a really dumb thing to post.
No argument there, I just found it stupid that he was being labelled an actual paedophile.
Brother, he said it was illegal and under age. That doesn't imply 16/17 because that would be "legal" and not "under age"
weird gymnastics for a guy blatantly admitting to ****ing <15 year olds in college
Brother, he said it was illegal and under age. That doesn't imply 16/17 because that would be "legal" and not "under age"
weird gymnastics for a guy blatantly admitting to ****ing <15 year olds in college
Being 18 or 19 and having sex with a 17 yer old could well be illegal in some states, although I presume there would be close age exemption laws, but I'm not knowledgeable enough on individual state laws to know for certain. If he admitted having sex with 15 year olds, that would be a problem, assuming he knew in advance.
It is so ****ing creepy to me you’re defending this guy in literally any context
Entirely unsurprising, but definitely creepy
A cabal of pedophile elites is flying all over the world with the richest oligarchs and the most powerful politicians and dude is like, ya it's fine.
Like even if Trump and Gates and Chomsky didn't diddle any kids, it's still really bad to fly around and hang out with the pedophiles!
That’s the claim that is being made, yes. Does the epstein flight logs show that though?
Independent evidence referring to something outside the flight logs. And yeah, generally people should want evidence that rape occurred, that’s what they would ask for in a court of law, no?
Sooooo basically you are agreeing that the flight logs don’t establish that someone raped kids but you wanted to soy out a little, is that what it is?
yes the Epstein logs show that a bunch of famous people flew all over with a known pedophile. do you understand what a flight log is?
this aint a court of law and it doesnt matter bc palling around with Epstein makes someone a scumbag regardless of diddling kids. but ya, they all ****ed kids.
well you brought up chomsky. my understanding is that all the flight log for chomsky shows is that they met somewhere. and independent corroboration indicates that they met for dinner.so how does it show that chomsky ****ed a kid?and by the way, I’m the one that’s motivated to say that Trump or Chomsky ****ed kids, you probably like Trump and Chomsky more than I do.also I might
amazing how easy that was to look up. the flight logs showed that they had dinner together. that’s it. anything else related to their relationship is purely a matter of public dealings that happened in the open.https://archive.is/20250329184729/https:...you guys act like he wasn’t a ric
here I am educating a guy that is absolutely incapable of learning anything. who is the fool here? its not his fault, but I should know better.
libs going to bat for people who swap 100s of thousands with pedophile rapists is about the most unsurprising thing of the day
If you actually read the details of the article, Chomsky claims that every single one of those dollars was his. But you’re a disgusting dishonest liar who just loves to feel morally superior by throwing around insults despite the fact that you’re utterly refarted.Imagine, if this is how he smears and throws under the bus his ideological allies what kind of blood libel he spread
By the way, at this point you are just moving the goalposts, because the original statement was about what the flight logs prove or do not prove, you understand that’s what you replied to right? I hope you’re not forgetting your antipsychotics and having a conversation that didn’t happen.
isnt that what I said? maybe reread this post a little slower and look up the fancy words like "swap" that you dont understand.I mean, I get it. you dont find it weird to use the pedophile sex trafficking rapist to do 100 thousand dollars transfers and you think any criticism of such activity is a "blood libel." I dont think we are going to agree on this one. personally, I
Here you go, the entire exchange so that we can see my very clear point was that being on the Epstein logs, in and of itself, does not show that someone is a kid diddler. A point to which you actually acquiesced to but for some reason had to make it look like you weren’t agreeing by throwing in something about how “they all diddled kids”, implying you did believe the flight logs showed more than what they actually showed.
In the case of Chomsky, indeed all the flight log shows is that he flew once to have dinner with Epstein, Woody Allen, Woody Allen’s wife, and Chomsky’s wife.
If there is independent evidence that shows something more, that’s a separate conversation.
So again, on the original point it seems like we’re in agreement, but you just want to posture, as you tend to do, that you are morally superior to me because you want to view this through the lens of outrage. Have fun with that.
Brother, he said it was illegal and under age. That doesn't imply 16/17 because that would be "legal" and not "under age"
weird gymnastics for a guy blatantly admitting to ****ing <15 year olds in college
I assumed that he meant under the age of 18, but even under that interpretation, he sounds like a creep.
😆
Let’s deploy troops on home soil and terrorize citizens. Seems like a great idea.
Imagine if Obama did this, they would be screaming about FEMA death camps.
Are you against these brave men and women getting the criminals off the street? They have a tough enough job with out the scum protestors interfering. Tom Homan the Border Czar is doing a great job of getting the filth off the streets. Illegal border crossings are down 95% since Trump took over. You owe these people a debt of gratitude.
I'm not a big Pete fan but I love the idea of bringing in reinforcements and smashing these turds.
Let’s deploy troops on home soil and terrorize citizens. Seems like a great idea.
Imagine if Obama did this, they would be screaming about FEMA death camps.
The citizens have been escalating their attacks on Ice. They've made it known that they will continue to escalate things. I'm all for bringing in whatever is necessary to allow Ice to do their job. They aren't there to terrorize citizens. Come on man!
The citizens have been escalating their attacks on Ice. They've made it known that they will continue to escalate things. I'm all for bringing in whatever is necessary to allow Ice to do their job. They aren't there to terrorize citizens. Come on man!
The start of this is a questionable policy of mass deportation, designed to send a message not for efficacy. And yes, the escalation of these events with the National Guard is designed to circumvent local autonomy.
If there were mass fires and looting I could see the public safety interest but at this point most of the footage I see shows people standing around for the most part. This is all to me a self-own because mass deportations are not even the most effective way to counter illegal immigration.
People are also worried about people who have legal status being deported, which has happened and the Trump administration has shown reluctance to reverse these deportations. They have also argued against birthright citizenship, which is another legitimate worry on the part of protestors.
Are you against these brave men and women getting the criminals off the street? They have a tough enough job with out the scum protestors interfering. Tom Homan the Border Czar is doing a great job of getting the filth off the streets. Illegal border crossings are down 95% since Trump took over. You owe these people a debt of gratitude.I'm not a big Pete fan but I love the idea
You're a good little nazi, aren't you.
The start of this is a questionable policy of mass deportation, designed to send a message not for efficacy. And yes, the escalation of these events with the National Guard is designed to circumvent local autonomy.If there were mass fires and looting I could see the public safety interest but at this point most of the footage I see shows people standing around for the most part
I read of "clashes" and "unrest", objects thrown toward the police and stuff like that.
How is that protesting? That's rioting.
How is the reason of the riots of any relevance whatsoever?
Shocking to learn a bootlicking shithead demands boots licked
Which events are you referring to here? they are rioting because of perfectly legal raids in which illegals are captured to be deported as the law requires.
I could understand rioting if law enforcement was not applying the law . but rioting because laws are enforced isn't something you should defend imo.
