Is The Epstein Pivot That Big A Deal
How much of the original allegations are actually now denied? Is it not possible that the only thing that has changed is
How do you come up with this interpretation
Are you straight out dismissing the stories about actually ''lending'' girls to other people
I am because if there were any linked to republicans that democrats could have exploited with Biden DOJ, they would have.
So we know for a certainty that there are no elements to believe Epstein trafficked girls to republicans or republican donors, unless you think democrats covered up republican crimes.
And the opposite is true as well because republicans in trump first term, and now, aren't prosecuting democrats and democrats donors for their purported sex dealings with Epstein.
You need to believe in "uniparty" conspiracies where both democrats and republicans had so many members (or donors) implicated with Epstein, they are both covering each other.
I could see some deranged super-leftist or super-alt-right person believing in that. But you guys claim democrats aren't the devil (unlike viktor and 72o), so how can you believe there is something hidden about Epstein and Trump when democrats had 4 years to prosecute that?
It doesn’t matter what we believe, it matters what Republicans believe. Trump covering up crimes isn’t going to make us not vote for him, because we’re already not voting for him.
It doesn’t matter what we believe, it matters what Republicans believe. Trump covering up crimes isn’t going to make us not vote for him, because we’re already not voting for him.
It matters what people believe (and remember) on nov 2026...
But again if you believe Trump is covering up crimes linked to Epstein, then you have to believe Biden did the same. Do you? i don't.
Donald Trump was good friends with the notorious sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein for many years, the New York Times reported over the weekend, a friendship that included Trump hosting Epstein at "raucous parties with cheerleaders and models." The Times wrote that one "woman has said that Mr. Trump groped her when Mr. Epstein brought her to Trump Tower in Manhattan to meet him." Also: "Another accuser recalled being eyed by Mr. Trump during a brief encounter in Mr. Epstein’s office, and claimed that Mr. Epstein had told Mr. Trump at the time that 'she’s not for you.'"
Furthermore, the Times wrote:
In 1992, an NBC News camera captured the pair at a Mar-a-Lago party that featured cheerleaders from the Buffalo Bills, who were in town that weekend for a game against the Miami Dolphins. At one point in the footage, Mr. Trump can be seen dancing amid a crowd of young women. Later, he appears to be pointing at other women while whispering something in Mr. Epstein’s ear, causing him to double over with laughter.
Months later, when Mr. Trump hosted a party at Mar-a-Lago for young women in a so-called calendar girl competition, Mr. Epstein was the only other guest, according to George Houraney, a Florida-based businessman who arranged the event. Mr. Houraney recalled being surprised that Mr. Epstein was the only other person on the guest list.
Attentive readers may notice that each of those anecdotes from the big news story contains at least one underlined word or phrase, marking a hyperlink to an already existing new story. The URLs on those hyperlinks contain keywords and dates like "2019/07/09/us/politics/trump-epstein.html."
It is not news—in the traditional sense that "news" means the reporting of facts or events previously unknown to the public—that Trump, a legally confirmed sexual abuser who bragged on tape about forcing himself on women, was deeply connected with the convicted sexual predator Epstein. Their shared interests and activities were reported at the time and afterwards, after Trump entered presidential politics and as Epstein was indicted on a new round of charges; Trump's original first-term Secretary of Labor, Alex Acosta, was forced to resign because he had been the prosecutor who protected Epstein from federal charges in 2008 in a shockingly lenient plea deal. Yet those old facts are current news.
yep, nothing to see here...
Thing is - all of that has been known for years and no one cares. The only new thing so far is that weird birthday letter thing which is too random to change anyone’s mind.
I am because if there were any linked to republicans that democrats could have exploited with Biden DOJ, they would have.
trump is the moron who has been using this thing politically for years--knowing full well he's deeply implicated lol It makes very little sense to jump in when your opponent is clearly walking himself into something so dumb--so you just sit back and let him run baby. It seems to be finally catching up to him now so we'll see how it plays out.
Looking like they’re gonna cut Ghislaine a deal somehow. Crazy how Biden railroaded an innocent woman!
So in the last few days:
>Former Epstein lawyer died
>Congress shut down early to prevent vote on releasing Epstein files
>Federal judge (Rosenberg, every single time) prevents unsealing grand jury testimony on Epstein
>Trump tells you to focus on Obama instead
Crazy that we're going through all of this and there's nothing in the files, but if there was incriminating stuff in the files it's because Biden put it there.
Looking like they’re gonna cut Ghislaine a deal somehow. Crazy how Biden railroaded an innocent woman!
She will get a pardon and only name Democrats.
So in the last few days:>Former Epstein lawyer died>Congress shut down early to prevent vote on releasing Epstein files>Federal judge (Rosenberg, every single time) prevents unsealing grand jury testimony on Epstein>Trump tells you to focus on Obama insteadCrazy that we're going through all of this and there's nothing in the files, but if there was incriminating stuff in the fi
angry upvote
So in the last few days:>Former Epstein lawyer died>Congress shut down early to prevent vote on releasing Epstein files>Federal judge (Rosenberg, every single time) prevents unsealing grand jury testimony on Epstein>Trump tells you to focus on Obama insteadCrazy that we're going through all of this and there's nothing in the files, but if there was incriminating stuff in the fi
wsj reporting that the doj told trump in may that he's mentioned several times in the epstein files. when was that apartheid clyde tweet again? lol
She will get a pardon and only name Democrats.
yeah, probably
cover-up seems to be going well
72 how on earth do you have the patience for such talking heads?
coffeezilla is great wdym
