Biggest loser in online poker history wants to grind $16k
I start this with some pictures:
nl2 -$8792.18 -82 buy ins below EV
nl5 (notice that pt4 shows party poker nl5 as nl4)
Paisting
The fact you posted graph without EV line tells us you had more suckouts go in your favour, that's how it works for everyone, sometimes you suck out sometimes they suck out.
Do you ever stop and think huh , maybe it's not those 100 people who are wrong, maybe it's me ?
Answer to question: If it's normal to lose 520 dollars to suckouts at nl10, what are the hands you should make money with? And also how much you need to profit when 520 dollars is normal to lose? Then you can show me other guy who loses 78 times 65-98% all ins in one month? If that is hard guy with 40-50 is enough. Show me.
I don't know why I'm even answering but nothing is normal with you. If you shove hundreds of hands in a row of course they call lighter and every now and then you have the best hand. Out of those hands every now and then they beat you with a worse hand.
We can't show you another monkey who loses 78 times with that equity because no one goes all-in thousands of times every month. The truth is in the EV line which in your case heads straight to southeast.
I would like to see the entire hand history for the month to see what the hell he was doing, that was a wild month even by his standards. If he loses anything close to even half of that amount this month then I am with that other poster who called bullshit on the fact welfare alone was his sole income.
Didn't he have a couple months were he almost broke even? So was flush with cash by his standards probably.
Answer to question: If it's normal to lose 520 dollars to suckouts at nl10, what are the hands you should make money with? And also how much you need to profit when 520 dollars is normal to lose? Then you can show me other guy who loses 78 times 65-98% all ins in one month? If that is hard guy with 40-50 is enough. Show me.
You really need professional help. Any 10-year-old understands that with 66% equity, I lose 1 out of 3 hands. You seem to be on the mental level of a toddler—it's reckless to let yourself lose that amount of money every month. Is there no one in your immediate circle who can manage your money?
Zero comments about this. And if it's normal to lose 520 dollars to suckouts nl10 zero comments about what are the hands and situations where the money comes from. And you say I'm pathetic. Are you all getting money from poker site to totally ignore this all.
You're lying to yourself. You know it, but you don't want to admit it. You removed the yellow line because you were extre
He's proud of losing, he's the best and biggest loser in the world. Think he was sweating when he had a couple decent months of near break even play and made up for it this month.
Zero comments about this. And if it's normal to lose 520 dollars to suckouts nl10 zero comments about what are the hands and situations where the money comes from. And you say I'm pathetic. Are you all getting money from poker site to totally ignore this all.
I'm going to be honest with you Paisting. You're right. We work for the sites (most of us work for 888) and we were sent here to egg you on so you'll keep playing. But we aren't allowed to tell you that so please just keep it a secret.
We also aren't allowed to tell you that its rigged against you, but I assure you it is and that the doomswitch has been pulled on your account. Sometimes we take it off and let you run good but then we turn it back on when you least expect it. Nobody else on 888 is as "unlucky" as you because 888 has turned the doomswitch to maximum for your account, which is why you run so far under EV all the time.
You may want to email 888 about this. They will confirm everything I've just said and will give you a refund if you threaten legal action or further exposure of their hoax operation.
I am only telling you this because I no longer work for them and am not longer required to keep their secrets.
Good luck.
Now we are ****ed, You'll pay for this Snow.
I'm going to be honest with you Paisting. You're right. We work for the sites (most of us work for 888) and we were sent here to egg you on so you'll keep playing. But we aren't allowed to tell you that so please just keep it a secret.We also aren't allowed to tell you that its rigged against you, but I assure you it is and that the doomswitch has been pulled on your account.
YOU‘RE FIRED
Answer to question: If it's normal to lose 520 dollars to suckouts at nl10, what are the hands you should make money with? And also how much you need to profit when 520 dollars is normal to lose? Then you can show me other guy who loses 78 times 65-98% all ins in one month? If that is hard guy with 40-50 is enough. Show me.
I've asked already but how many times were you all in before the river and how many times were you all in before the flop? . You list your "suckout" numbers with no context. If you were all in 10k times then 78 "suckouts" is nothing.
I've asked already but how many times were you all in before the river and how many times were you all in before the flop? . You list your "suckout" numbers with no context. If you were all in 10k times then 78 "suckouts" is nothing.
We all know the answer to this. Paisting's games are going all in pre or flop more within a week than most large volume regs go within a year or more.
Paisting, you know why you removed the EV line this month. You wont admit it to us as you are likely refusing to admit it to yourself. Please find a new hobby as its beyond ridiculous now. Totally wasting your life and its sad to see.
Paisty, that's the point of equities, you sometimes have to lose with the best hand. You should go back to elementary school if it's difficult for you.
awesome this thread is still going strong 6 years lol
I've read all Sklansky, all Harrington, all Miller, watched huge amount of videos, bought trackers and calculators.Still after those years and after that all I've lost huge amount of money on those stakes. I try to play my best but losing to huge suckouts like 95/5 favorite makes me really upset.I've lost literally all my money including all my life savings to online poker. I w
And this is 6 years ago... read every book, watched videos & bought trackers
Back then already lost all his life savings
And this is 6 years ago... read every book, watched videos & bought trackers
Back then already lost all his life savings
1) Sklansky, Harrington, and Miller are barely applicable beyond the basics and get less relevant as time goes on and poker evolves. What's next is he going to tell us he read Caro and now he's a master of timing tells?
2) The videos are probably blackrain's sorry excuse for poker theory - "5 hands you NEED TO STOP PLAYING IMMEDIATELY" eye roll.
3) Trackers and calculators - There is no way he's using either of these correctly.
It's like wondering why I'm not a surgeon even though I listened to a doctor on a podcast.
A bigger problem than reading outdated material is the fact that he clearly absorbed none of it.
Yea that was more my point.
Nowhere in those books, videos & solvers does it say to play like him. Nowhere near.
For him actually listening to sklanksy & harrington (even though its outdated) would be a huge huge improvement.
Which you can expect isa must for someone who lost his life savings 6 years ago and somehow keeps on bleeding money
1) Sklansky, Harrington, and Miller are barely applicable beyond the basics and get less relevant as time goes on and poker evolves. What's next is he going to tell us he read Caro and now he's a master of timing tells?
None of these boys advocated playing 100% vpip versus steal and going all in every other hand, Paisting is applying none of the theories these books/authors recommend.
He is/was bullshitting as usual. The only thing he seems to remember about anything written was "bet the maximum they call" or something like that, and he is just abusing this "theory" to be able to justify bad plays.
Probably whoever said something similar never meant you should go allin 150bb with trash because they are calling you with better hands.
I lost 78 times with 65–97% equity:
3x 95%+ equity suckouts
1x 90-95% equity suckouts
17x 80-90% equity suckouts
33x 70-80% equity suckouts
24x 65-70% equity suckouts
It's time to finally wake up!
Hold my bear
Just checked my sucouts
5x 95%+ equity suckouts
12x 90-95% equity suckouts
67x 80-90% equity suckouts
89x 70-80% equity suckouts
61x 65-70% equity suckouts
You are far from being most unlucky player, so STFU, wipe away snot and keep playing. It's long way ahead You to call Yourself Unluckiest player.
Hold my bear
Just checked my sucouts
5x 95%+ equity suckouts
12x 90-95% equity suckouts
67x 80-90% equity suckouts
89x 70-80% equity suckouts
61x 65-70% equity suckouts
You are far from being most unlucky player, so STFU, wipe away snot and keep playing. It's long way ahead You to call Yourself Unluckiest player.
Don’t talk bullshit. Show graph and show hands from that month.
At this point zero people on earth has shown that much losings with best hand that I do.
Don’t talk bullshit. Show graph and show hands from that month.
At this point zero people on earth has shown that much losings with best hand that I do.
None what You have requested have any sense. I provides same numbers as You did (times lost / EV%) . So STFU , luckbox!
To prove my point, I checked how many times I have won, when opponent is favorite
I have won
3 time with <5% equity.
9 5-10%,
45 10-20%,
38 20-30,
28 30-35.
As You can clearly see I'm in big "deficit", so You don't have to see my graphs to know how UNLUCKY player I am and how far You are from being one.
