RFK - Make America Healthy? again?
I believe this guy is going to need his own thread.
i don't understand what he means here
Probably those companies knows they can’t change antiwaxx and conspiracy people .
So why bother ?
30% of the people will say it’s fake numbers anyway shrug .
Trump should know this since it’s his playbook .
Probably those companies knows they can’t change antiwaxx and conspiracy people .
So why bother ?
30% of the people will say it’s fake numbers anyway shrug .
Trump should know this since it’s his playbook .
And a giant chunk of them are perfectly fine with letting biz pollute the environment like crazy effectively forcing everyone to suffer any health consequences. Then they go and get distracted by bs like clouds lol These are not serious people.
He/His/Him might literally be demon-possessed.
which one you suggest ?
.
Not gonna lie that lower right pic is how I imagine Luci 😀
Not new news but nobody has mentioned this.
Say what?
"Every last one of them is wrong and drips with disdain and slavery," Ladapo said of vaccine mandates.
Not new news but nobody has mentioned this.
Say what?
I agree that even if black he shouldn't talk about slavery nonchalantly because he is not a black descendant of slaves.
That said vaccine mandates are incredibly fascist and inimical to core values of freedom so he is very right on the essence of what he claims. In a better world they are all unconstitutional but unfortunately the founding fathers didn't think of an explicit body autonomy right so they are legal.
But that doesn't mean that someone canìt feel very strongly against them and find everyone who loves freedom in agreement.
More importantly , he pushed prep A LOT (a 20k/year treatment for homosexuals to take so they can do as much unprotected sex as they want without getting hiv basically), and thanks to his efforts your country now subsidizes unprotected gay sex to the tune of 1 bln per year (500k+ people are on prep).
half my instagram ads are from companies offering free prep to me - you know there's a bonanza of gov funds if they are spending millions on instagram to find people to sign up
I don't think people should share pictures like that online because of people like you but also as someone who claims to be a libertarian and had a teary eyed rant about citizens inalienable right to vape in stores its a bit odd you think what someone does in their spare time should affect anything
agreed - total low blow here luc and wholly inconsistent with your stated ideology
Prep being covered by health insurance (which means other people as well) is morally HORRIFIC.
your strawmanning of rampant gay orgies aside (yes i acknowledge that gay men by and large have far more casual partners than the general population etc but you're taking it way too far)
it's very likely cheaper in the long run to provide prep instead of aids treatment - especially given that aids treatment is so effective it'll go on for decades for each patient
and... i have a very strong feeling that if aids were more easily transmitted via vaginal sex rather than anal and sexual lifestyles were flipped then you would be arguing the opposite, that the government needs to provide you prep as a basic right - otherwise your universal basic vaginas are not very useful
it's very likely cheaper in the long run to provide prep instead of aids treatment - especially given that aids treatment is so effective it'll go on for decades for each patient
They’re not going to provide long term care.
The basic underlying point of RFK, and to an extent ole Lucy, is that if you get sick and die you were a weak bodied drain on society and the rest of us are better off not having to prop you up.
your strawmanning of rampant gay orgies aside (yes i acknowledge that gay men by and large have far more casual partners than the general population etc but you're taking it way too far)it's very likely cheaper in the long run to provide prep instead of aids treatment - especially given that aids treatment is so effective it'll go on for decades for each patientand... i have a
not taking too far because monkey pox (which that satanist guy became the czar of) was literally spread through gay orgies.
It's not "cheaper in the long run" to provide 20k/year treatment to all sexual promiscuous homosexuals for life.
And believe me if prep-equivalents existed for all other STD heterosexual people can take i wouldn't be in favor of them as well (not in the "taxpayers should pay" sense).
There is "prep" that works for a lot of things that is "eating a lot of proper food" but i am not in favour of paying for other people to have good quality steaks and butter and olive oil and so on, so they get ill less often than if they eat the disgusting **** they eat.
Actually all this discourse makes it more and more important to just get rid of the horrific notion of public healthcare in the first place
They’re not going to provide long term care.
The basic underlying point of RFK, and to an extent ole Lucy, is that if you get sick and die you were a weak bodied drain on society and the rest of us are better off not having to prop you up.
exactly except car accidents and the like. The fact that people with good genes / good behavior should subsidize people with bad genes / bad behaviour is morally horrific.
If we could pool people with similar genes/behaviors to reduce the variance it would be nice. But we can't so it's better not to distopically subsidize bad behavior and bad genes.
exactly except car accidents and the like. The fact that people with good genes / good behavior should subsidize people with bad genes / bad behaviour is morally horrific.
If we could pool people with similar genes/behaviors to reduce the variance it would be nice. But we can't so it's better not to distopically subsidize bad behavior and bad genes.
I’ll say this man, at least youre up front about it instead of hiding behind mealy mouth bullshit and pseudo science.
On the other hand, youre also totally cool with blatantly lying about your motivations to win elections and trick people into supporting you.
I’ll say this man, at least youre up front about it instead of hiding behind mealy mouth bullshit and pseudo science.
On the other hand, youre also totally cool with blatantly lying about your motivations to win elections and trick people into supporting you.
When? i never run for elections and the only currently elected person that is reasonably close to my position is Milei who didn't need to lie at all. He went on TV saying leftists are monsters who are sucking you dry and we need to cut the state with as much violence as possible and got elected.
I said trump needs to lie, don't think for a moment i am represented by someone like trump lol. He is just a little less disastrous than Harris could have been and i STILL think we would be better off with a divided gvmng (republican senate, Harris president).
But Trump surprised me positively a lot this time, except tariffs ofc. He rushed a ton of things i completly agree about in a way i never believed he could have done, and maybe SCOTUS will confirm some of them and that would be majestic.
But Trump is still a center left candidate who doesn't hate the state as the enemy of the people. He thinks "it can be used for good". He cut some stuff but what he did to USAID he should do to everything the state deals with except prisons, borders and the militaries to be "my candidate".
The 10bln stake in Intel isn't my way of playing at all
not taking too far because monkey pox (which that satanist guy became the czar of) was literally spread through gay orgies.It's not "cheaper in the long run" to provide 20k/year treatment to all sexual promiscuous homosexuals for life.And believe me if prep-equivalents existed for all other STD heterosexual people can take i wouldn't be in favor of them as well (not in the "tax
So u against vaccination and then you are angry when people got sick without taking precaution ( u know because of freedom !) and we shouldn’t pay for them ?
So you would agree anyone getting sick by a virus which they could had a vaccine for but choose not to take ( because you know they aren’t “pussies” ) shouldn’t have any help to pay their medical bill ?
That actually sounds reasonable to me.
People taking responsibility for their dead brain action shrug.
Should have dove this for Covid .
Trump wouldn’t had enough vote to win in 2024
So u against vaccination and then you are angry when people got sick without taking precaution ( u know because of freedom !) and we shouldn’t pay for them ?So you would agree anyone getting sick by a virus which they could had a vaccine for but choose not to take ( because you know they aren’t “pussies” ) shouldn’t have any help to pay their medical bill ?That actually sounds
I am not against vaccinations. I am against MANDATES. I understand for people who don't give a **** about freedom that's the same. My kids are vaccinated for basically everything we vaccinate for in Italy except meningococcus which i don't believe works well enough to justify it, that's about it.
I would stop vaccinating them for the flu since they were 6, mom wants to vaccinate them anyway, i don't care too much so they get the yearly flu shot (i don't).
I am not against unprotected homosexual orgies. I mean i wouldn't participate, and i would suggest my kids not to participate, but i don't want to ban or regulate them.
I am against paying taxpayers money to subsidize that behavior.
If there was a clear cut way to determine if not taking a vaccine caused a disease yes i would be ok with not covering that disease. But i mean, i don't want public heathcare to exist in the first place at all lol, and i want insurance companies to be able to use ANYTHING THEY WANT to discriminate against you.
Healthcare is never a "public thing", it's only, and strictly a private thing and basically the gvmnt should be completly out of it
they all bend the knee , and in this case they also suck the ****
https://www.axios.com/2025/09/03/covid-v...
Pfizer CEO says Trump "worthy of Nobel Peace Prize" for COVID vaccines
I am not against vaccinations. I am against MANDATES. I understand for people who don't give a **** about freedom that's the same. My kids are vaccinated for basically everything we vaccinate for in Italy except meningococcus which i don't believe works well enough to justify it, that's about it.I would stop vaccinating them for the flu since they were 6, mom wants to vaccinate
First off , not taking vaccine and ending up at the hospital for it is just more expensive and taking ressources away from smart people who actually need those ressources because they know prevention cost less the actual treatment .
Now do you believe a healthy work force is better for the economy then a sick workforce ?
So yeah government intervention in healthcare to try make people all healthy can actually be a plus for the economy .
No idea why u think healthcare is solely a private thing but this isn’t the only value you hold dear to your heart that I don’t comprehend .
If you are in need of help (especially when you are sick!) and u can have it , I don’t see how it’s negative but you do you .
But all I know is life expectancy rises dramatically since 1900 (never before that) so seem universal healthcare and government interventions in many other area did help a lot despite your belief that government aren’t useful .
But anyway , at least we agree on 1 thing .
You don’t take a vaccine because you are anti science that’s fine , no health coverage for them on that particular instance is fine by me .
I mean if many people can’t have decent medical coverage by insurance companies for example because they smoke .
How the hell they don’t apply the same criteria for those that won’t take vaccine beats me …
