RFK - Make America Healthy? again?
I believe this guy is going to need his own thread.
According to most analysts in 2024, RFK was pouching voters from both parties, which is why both parties attempted everything they could not to have his name on the ballot in various states.Things changed after Harris got nominated, polls changed, RFK at that point was polling lower but mostly among otherwise rightwing voters. That's when Trump took him in.Winning is the most i
Your entire point of view is so toxic and pointless. There is no long term goal here other than extract and restrict.
In your world view society is absolutely ****ed. There is no equitable future, there is nothing but pain and suffering.
I can't express enough how devoid of humanity you are and how dumb your world view is. Thats fine for you I guess, but its absolutely ****ing ******ed to expect society to act like you
Your entire point of view is so toxic and pointless. There is no long term goal here other than extract and restrict.In your world view society is absolutely ****ed. There is no equitable future, there is nothing but pain and suffering.I can't express enough how devoid of humanity you are and how dumb your world view is. Thats fine for you I guess, but its absolutely ****ing
I don't know why you think i "expect society to act like me", but republicans did win the last elections. That's a fact.
And here is the stupidity of this graph: In 2001 vaccines stopped having any mercury compounds. The mercury (in Thimerosal) was effective in preventing vaccines from becoming innefective due to bacteria and fungi in their bottles. So either the rate of autism is going up since 2001 because of bacteria and fungi in the bottles that used to have Thimerosal or because autism isn't being caused by vaccines.
Unless you think that vaccines themselves cause autism because they contain some kind of viral components to fight disease but those are causing the problem. The thing is that the graph should be steady and not rising if the problem was vaccines. Because prior to 2001 over 95% of kids were getting vaccinated and after 2001 over 95% of kids were still getting vaccinated. Now though it has dropped to like 92%.
What I would glean from the graph is that the problem is likely environmental. It could be air quality especially in cities caused by gas, oil, coal, and cement. It could be caused by an increase in pesticide use in non-organic foods. It could also be caused by chemicals in water supplies.
But it is kind of shocking that people on the right blaming vaccines for autism don't want to support clean energy. Oh wait. Republicans are getting 97% of corporate donations from gas, oil, and coal energy companies.
yes and? you still buy more stuff with that sp500 holding in the USA than before.
Only an issue for european owners basically who are breaking even (usd lost more vs the eur than most other currencies).
But euro markets went insanely well so, not a big problem there either
And here is the stupidity of this graph: In 2001 vaccines stopped having any mercury compounds. The mercury (in Thimerosal) was effective in preventing vaccines from becoming innefective due to bacteria and fungi in their bottles. So either the rate of autism is going up since 2001 because of bacteria and fungi in the bottles that used to have Thimerosal or because autism i
You don't get the joke of the graph do you? wild got it
ofc vaccines aren't causing autism. Nothing is, they just massively overdiagnose it vs the past because of financial and non financial incentives.
They also moved a lot of "mental disability" diagnosis into autism (non functional autism), like people with very low IQ in general. Because it's more "inclusive" or something.
But the mandates made insane amount of money for pfizer, and those were all democrat party choices
Farming it out to prescription/commercial does pretty well too bud. The last numbers I saw were ~$20/avg shot under the mandates--whereas the other way it ends up being ~100+/shot. No insurance approx double that.
Can you wrap your mind around why some politicians are "anti-vax" mandate now? 😀
Farming it out to prescription/commercial does pretty well too bud. The last numbers I saw were ~$20/avg shot under the mandates--whereas the other way it ends up being ~100+/shot. No insurance approx double that.
Can you wrap your mind around why some politicians are "anti-vax" mandate now? 😀
SCOTUS said that the OSHA covid vax mandate was unconstitutional on jan 13 , 2022. Pfizer is -60% since then. That's in a market that basically doubled in the meantime
Over the long run, that's it's natural state. I don't know why anybody thinks it's some kind of achievement for Trump.
Over the long run, that's it's natural state. I don't know why anybody thinks it's some kind of achievement for Trump.
it might be natural on avg for the stockmarket to grow like nominal gdp in the long run (or perhaps a bit better because of various reasons), but it grew a lot more than that for now under trump
yes and? you still buy more stuff with that sp500 holding in the USA than before.
Only an issue for european owners basically who are breaking even (usd lost more vs the eur than most other currencies).
But euro markets went insanely well so, not a big problem there either
Thats the problem.
You have to sell it …..
Wages being eating by inflation is way worst then boosting sp500 from inflation for the vast majority of people.
I’m surprised u don’t think so .
it might be natural on avg for the stockmarket to grow like nominal gdp in the long run (or perhaps a bit better because of various reasons), but it grew a lot more than that for now under trump
Yes thx inflation plus bubble shrug
so does j&j have a lawsuit here if the government can't prove these claims they're making? and especially since they didn't blame paracetamol/acetaminophen, but tylenol
Thats the problem.
You have to sell it …..
Wages being eating by inflation is way worst then boosting sp500 from inflation for the vast majority of people.
I’m surprised u don’t think so .
wages are growing more than inflation in the USA since 2023.
I am surprised you comment about that without knowing that.
wages are growing more than inflation in the USA since 2023.
I am surprised you comment about that without knowing that.
congrats again for finding one small data points that should nullified years and decades of the reverse with your common statistic expertise.
but if i was right and u actually believe the premise inflation is great for the majority of people because some sp500 index goes up in value its fine.
i think its insane but its ok which is what you are arguing.
congrats again for finding one small data points that should nullified years and decades of the reverse with your common statistic expertise.
but if i was right and u actually believe the premise inflation is great for the majority of people because some sp500 index goes up in value its fine.
i think its insane but its ok which is what you are arguing.
"decades of the reverse"
do you realize you have no clue about wage dynamics in the USA?
btw cumulative inflation since the year 2000 was approx 88%
the SP500 is approx +600% since the year 2000 (+ dividends)
weird tweet from 2017
and this is the actual tweet if you think it was fake
"decades of the reverse" do you realize you have no clue about wage dynamics in the USA? btw cumulative inflation since the year 2000 was approx 88%the SP500 is approx +600% since the year 2000 (+ dividends)
Yes,
Inflation, many QE, 0% interest rates over a decade , bubble.
Why shouldnt the stock market be highly valued …..
You right .
Yup you’re an expert in every field and much smarter then any of us .
He understands so much about devaluation he had to look it up in his notes...
